| Literature DB >> 30510397 |
Grace M Richter1, Beau Sylvester1, Zhongdi Chu2, Bruce Burkemper1, Ingy Madi1, Ryuna Chang1, Alena Reznik1, Rohit Varma1, Ruikang K Wang2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To quantify peripapillary microvasculature within the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and normal eyes, determine association of perfusion parameters with structural and functional measures, and report diagnostic accuracy of perfusion parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: POAG and normal patients underwent 6×6 mm2 optic nerve head scans (Angioplex optical coherence tomography angiography [OCTA]; Cirrus HD-OCT 5000) and Humphrey Field Analyzer II-i 24-2 visual field (VF) testing. Prototype software performed semiautomatic segmentation to create RNFL en face images and quantified vessel area density (VAD), vessel skeleton density (VSD), and vessel complexity index (VCI) in the optic nerve head globally and focally. Generalized estimating equations models assessed association of OCTA parameters with VF mean deviation (MD) and RNFL thickness.Entities:
Keywords: diagnostic accuracy; function; large vessel subtraction; micro-circulation; optic nerve head; segmentation; structure
Year: 2018 PMID: 30510397 PMCID: PMC6231432 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S179816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Figure 1En face images (6×6 mm2) of the radial peripapillary capillaries of the optic nerve head, acquired by automatic (left) and semi-automatic (right) segmentation.
Figure 2Quadrants for focal analysis.
Abbreviations: I, inferior quadrant; N, nasal quadrant; S, superior quadrant; T, temporal quadrant.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of normal and glaucomatous groups
| Variables | Normal eyes | Glaucomatous eyes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| n=17 eyes (from 12 patients) | n=38 eyes (from 30 patients)
| |||
| Mild | Moderate-severe | |||
|
| ||||
| Age (years) | 55 (12) | 62 (12) | 64 (14) | 0.087 |
| Female sex | 10 (59%) | 12 (63%) | 13 (68%) | 0.604 |
| Hypertension | 2 (12%) | 6 (32%) | 8 (42%) | 0.093 |
| Diabetes | 1 (6%) | 4 (21%) | 4 (21%) | 0.495 |
| Number of glaucoma medications | 0 | 1.63 (1.21) | 2.00 (1.63) | 0.961 |
| Eyes on timolol | 0 | 1 (5%) | 8 (42%) | |
| Eyes on brimonidine | 0 | 8 (42%) | 8 (42%) | 0.642 |
| Eyes on prostaglandin analogs | 0 | 14 (74%) | 13 (68%) | 0.544 |
| Eyes on carbonic anhydrase inhibitors | 0 | 7 (37%) | 6 (32%) | 0.203 |
| History of glaucoma surgery | 0 | 3 (16%) | 6 (32%) | 0.646 |
| Central corneal thickness (µm) | 562 (38) | 550 (32) | 550 (46) | 0.458 |
| Intraocular Pressure (mmHg) | 13.8 (3.8) | 12.4 (3.6) | 14.0 (4.7) | 0.700 |
| Visual field mean deviation (dB) | −1.04 (1.11) | −3.68 (1.93) | −11.4 (5.42) | |
| Visual field pattern standard deviation (dB) | 1.55 (0.35) | 6.14 (2.39) | 9.03 (3.27) | |
| Cup-disc ratio | 0.42 (0.17) | 0.74 (0.22) | 0.84 (0.14) | |
Notes:
All data listed as mean (standard deviation) or frequency (percent).
P-values listed for normal vs glaucoma, except for treatment-related parameters, which are between disease severities. Person-specific continuous variables based on Wilcoxon rank sum test on normal and glaucoma eyes; eye-specific variables based on clustered Wilcoxon rank sum test, adjusting for inter-eye correlation. Fisher’s exact test used for categorical variables, including glaucoma treatments between disease severities; unable to control for inter-eye correlation, so only one eye from patients contributing both eyes was taken into account. Significant P-value<0.05 shown in bold.
Mean OCTA parameter and OCT RNFL thickness values for normal subjects, mild, and moderate-severe POAG patients
| Parameters | Normal | Mild POAG | Moderate-severe POAG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Normal vs mild POAG | Mild vs moderate-severe POAG | Normal vs moderate-severe POAG | |
|
| ||||||
| Vessel area density (VAD) | 0.371 (0.024) | 0.336 (0.036) | 0.308 (0.037) | |||
| Vessel skeleton density (VSD) | 0.172 (0.011) | 0.156 (0.017) | 0.142 (0.018) | |||
| Vessel complexity index (VCI) | 2.55 (0.19) | 2.26 (0.23) | 1.97 (0.28) | |||
| RNFL thickness (µm) | 101.3 (15.1) | 72.7 (9.3) | 65.6 (6.9) | |||
|
| ||||||
| VAD – hemisphere data | ||||||
| Inferior | 0.439 (0.020) | 0.406 (0.030) | 0.366 (0.052) | |||
| Superior | 0.442 (0.019) | 0.417 (0.042) | 0.398 (0.044) | 0.19 | 0.053 | |
| VSD – hemisphere data | ||||||
| Inferior | 0.207 (0.008) | 0.192 (0.013) | 0.171 (0.025) | |||
| Superior | 0.207 (0.008) | 0.195 (0.018) | 0.186 (0.022) | 0.099 | 0.10 | |
| VCI – hemisphere data | ||||||
| Inferior | 3,860 (230) | 3,271 (309) | 2,852 (562) | |||
| Superior | 3,971 (216) | 3,419 (434) | 3,220 (452) | 0.12 | ||
|
| ||||||
| VAD – quadrant data | ||||||
| T | 0.439 (0.031) | 0.424 (0.046) | 0.390 (0.054) | 0.76 | 0.12 | |
| S | 0.440 (0.027) | 0.406 (0.060) | 0.396 (0.055) | 0.18 | ||
| N | 0.425 (0.041) | 0.391 (0.068) | 0.366 (0.061) | 0.26 | 0.060 | |
| I | 0.448 (0.026) | 0.404 (0.030) | 0.365 (0.063) | 0.067 | ||
| VSD – quadrant data | ||||||
| T | 0.207 (0.014) | 0.200 (0.020) | 0.184 (0.025) | 0.68 | 0.11 | |
| S | 0.207 (0.010) | 0.190 (0.031) | 0.183 (0.028) | 0.19 | ||
| N | 0.196 (0.019) | 0.183 (0.032) | 0.170 (0.031) | 0.41 | 0.090 | |
| I | 0.212 (0.010) | 0.191 (0.014) | 0.170 (0.030) | 0.065 | ||
| VCI – quadrant data | ||||||
| T | 1,543 (167) | 1,457 (166) | 1,228 (223) | 0.16 | ||
| S | 1,481 (100) | 1,312 (268) | 1,232 (256) | 0.18 | ||
| N | 1,353 (203) | 1,257 (291) | 1,169 (273) | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.089 |
| I | 1,506 (95) | 1,262 (221) | 1,082 (241) | 0.063 | ||
| RNFL thickness (µm) – quadrant data | ||||||
| T | 71.4 (10.3) | 58.4 (15.3) | 55.8 (10.5) | 0.16 | 0.68 | |
| S | 120.6 (22.2) | 85.1 (19.7) | 83.5 (18.5) | 0.82 | ||
| N | 78.3 (10.6) | 64.3 (10.0) | 62.1 (8.6) | 0.067 | 0.33 | |
| I | 134.6 (23.3) | 79.3 (15.8) | 70.79 (21.0) | 0.15 | ||
Notes:
P-values are based on clustered Wilcoxon rank sum test, controlling for inter-eye correlation, between: normal vs mild POAG; mild vs moderate-severe POAG; normal vs moderate-severe POAG.
Global VCI values divided by 109. Significant P-value<0.05 shown in bold.
Abbreviations: I, inferior quadrant; N, nasal quadrant; OCTA, optical coherence tomography angiography; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; S, superior quadrant; T, temporal quadrant.
Figure 3Moderate-severe glaucoma case (A) 6×6 mm2 en face image. (B) Skeletonized vessel image with large vessels removed. (C) Vessel density map with binary vessels, showing areas of higher vessel density in warmer colors. (D) Vessel complexity map with binary vessels, showing areas of greater vessel branching in warmer colors. (E) Cirrus OCT RNFL deviation map (top) and RNFL thickness by quadrant (bottom). (F) Probability total (left) and pattern (right) deviation maps.
Abbreviations: I, inferior quadrant; N, nasal quadrant; OCT, optical coherence tomography; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; S, superior quadrant; T, temporal quadrant.
Figure 4Mild glaucoma case (A) 6×6 mm2 en face image. (B) Skeletonized vessel image with large vessels removed. (C) Vessel density map with binary vessels, showing areas of higher vessel density in warmer colors. (D) Vessel complexity map with binary vessels, showing areas of greater vessel branching in warmer colors. (E) Cirrus OCT RNFL deviation map (top) and RNFL thickness by quadrant (bottom). (F) Probability total (left) and pattern (right) deviation maps.
Abbreviations: OCT, optical coherence tomography; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer.
Linear regressiona of VF MD on OCTA parameters globally and by hemisphere in POAG
| Mean (SD) | Corresponding vessel area density | Corresponding vessel skeleton density | Corresponding VCI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Beta | R ( | Beta | R ( | Beta | R ( | |||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Global VF MD | −7.44 (5.63) | 81.7 | 0.770 (0.449) | 167.4 | 0.558 (0.312) | 11.9 | < | 0.632 (0.399) | ||
| Superior VF MD | −8.31 (7.96) | 198.3 | 0.629 (0.396) | 419.4 | 0.624 (0.390) | 19.5 | < | 0.717 (0.513) | ||
| Inferior VF MD | −6.83 (5.65) | 148.3 | 0.456 (0.208) | 347.9 | 0.486 (0.237) | 18.6 | < | 0.615 (0.378) | ||
Notes:
Controlled for inter-eye correlation.
“Pseudo” R2 reported as the coefficient of determination resulting from linear regression by the generalized estimating equation technique, to be interpreted as the amount of VF MD that can be explained by the model.
Beta values for VCI scaled per 109 change in VCI; focal beta values for VCI scaled per 103 change in VCI. Significant P-value<0.05 shown in bold.
Abbreviations: OCTA, optical coherence tomography angiography; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; VCI, vessel complexity index; VF MD, visual field mean deviation.
Linear regressiona of RNFL thickness on OCTA parameters globally and by quadrant in glaucoma
| Mean (SD) | Corresponding vessel area density | Corresponding vessel skeleton density | Corresponding VCI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||
| Beta | R ( | Beta | R ( | Beta | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Global RNFLt | 69.2 (8.8) | 242.1 | < | 0.706 (0.499) | 516.7 | < | 0.724 (0.524) | 32.5 | < | 0.736 (0.542) |
|
| ||||||||||
| Temporal RNFLt | 57.1 (13.0) | 50.0 | 0.091 | 0.462 (0.213) | 142.1 | 0.482 (0.232) | 11.4 | 0.13 | 0.465 (0.216) | |
| Superior RNFLt | 84.3 (18.9) | 206.1 | < | 0.541 (0.292) | 425.9 | < | 0.563 (0.317) | 53.5 | < | 0.628 (0.394) |
| Nasal RNFLt | 63.2 (9.3) | 68.3 | 0.510 (0.260) | 138.2 | 0.501 (0.251) | 15.8 | 0.507 (0.257) | |||
| Inferior RNFLt | 75.1 (18.8) | 216.6 | 0.523 (0.274) | 463.0 | 0.533 (0.285) | 58.8 | 0.614 (0.377) | |||
Notes:
Controlled for inter-eye correlation.
“Pseudo” R2 reported as the coefficient of determination resulting from linear regression by the generalized estimating equation technique, to be interpreted as the amount of RNFLt that can be explained by the model.
Global beta values for VCI scaled per 109 change in VCI; focal beta values for VCI scaled per 103 change in VCI. Significant P-value<0.05 shown in bold.
Abbreviations: OCTA, optical coherence tomography angiography; POAG, primary open-angle glaucoma; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; RNFLt, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness; VCI, vessel complexity index.
Diagnostic accuracy of OCTA parameters
| Area under curve statistic | ||
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| VAD | 0.868 | <0.0001 |
| VSD | 0.855 | <0.0001 |
| VCI | 0.868 | <0.0001 |
| RNFL thickness | 0.973 | <0.0001 |
Notes:
Controlled for age and inter-eye correlation. P-values for area under curve contrasts between VAD-VSD, VAD-VCI, VSD-VCI, VAD-RNFL, VSD-RNFL, and VCI-RNFL were all >0.05.
Abbreviations: OCTA, optical coherence tomography angiography; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer; VAD, vessel area density; VSD, vessel skeleton density; VCI, vessel complexity index.