Literature DB >> 30510099

Safety netting for primary care: evidence from a literature review.

Daniel Jones1, Laurie Dunn1, Ian Watt2, Una Macleod1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ensuring patient safety is vital in primary care. One mechanism to increase patient safety is through a practice known as safety netting. Safety netting is widely recommended in national guidelines; however, a variety of definitions exist with no consensus on when safety netting should be used and what advice or actions it should contain. AIM: This study aimed to identify different definitions of safety netting to provide conceptual clarity and propose a common approach to safety netting in primary care. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Literature review and evidence synthesis of international articles relating to safety netting in primary care.
METHOD: An electronic database and grey-literature search was conducted using terms around the theme of safety netting with broad inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 47 studies were included in the review. Safety netting was defined as a consultation technique to communicate uncertainty, provide patient information on red-flag symptoms, and plan for future appointments to ensure timely re-assessment of a patient's condition. Safety-netting advice may include information on the natural history of the illness, advice on worrying symptoms to look out for, and specific information on how and when to seek help. In addition to advice within the consultation, safety netting includes follow-up of investigations and hospital referrals. Safety netting was considered to be particularly important when consulting with children, the acutely unwell, patients with multimorbidity, and those with mental health problems.
CONCLUSION: Safety netting is more than solely the communication of uncertainty within a consultation. It should include plans for follow-up as well as important administrative aspects, such as the communication of test results and management of hospital letters. © British Journal of General Practice 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  consultation; primary care; safety netting; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30510099      PMCID: PMC6301356          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X700193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  29 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  The consultation hill: a new model to aid teaching consultation skills.

Authors:  Ian McKelvey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Commentary: how can we make diagnosis safer?.

Authors:  Gordon D Schiff; Lucian L Leape
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Diagnostic safety-netting.

Authors:  Susanna Almond; David Mant; Matthew Thompson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Dealing with low-incidence serious diseases in general practice.

Authors:  Frank Buntinx; David Mant; Ann Van den Bruel; Norbert Donner-Banzhof; Geert-Jan Dinant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Which urgent care services do febrile children use and why?

Authors:  Sabine Maguire; Rita Ranmal; Sirkka Komulainen; Sarah Pearse; Ian Maconochie; Monica Lakhanpaul; Ffion Davies; Joe Kai; Terence Stephenson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 7.  The natural history of acute cough in children aged 0 to 4 years in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alastair D Hay; Andrew D Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Patient assessment: effective consultation and history taking.

Authors:  Gerri Kaufman
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2008 Oct 1-7

9.  An international language for patient safety: Global progress in patient safety requires classification of key concepts.

Authors:  Sir Liam Donaldson
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.038

10.  Mix of methods is needed to identify adverse events in general practice: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Raymond Wetzels; René Wolters; Chris van Weel; Michel Wensing
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  18 in total

1.  Quality improvements of safety-netting guidelines for cancer in UK primary care: insights from a qualitative interview study of GPs.

Authors:  Alice Tompson; Brian D Nicholson; Sue Ziebland; Julie Evans; Clare Bankhead
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in patients with signs or symptoms of suspected colorectal cancer (CRC): a joint guideline from the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG).

Authors:  Kevin J Monahan; Michael M Davies; Muti Abulafi; Ayan Banerjea; Brian D Nicholson; Ramesh Arasaradnam; Neil Barker; Sally Benton; Richard Booth; David Burling; Rachel Victoria Carten; Nigel D'Souza; James Edward East; Jos Kleijnen; Michael Machesney; Maria Pettman; Jenny Pipe; Lance Saker; Linda Sharp; James Stephenson; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 31.793

Review 3.  The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient-centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait-listed patients and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Cindy Y Y Yip; Jonathan Irish; Frances C Wright; Barry Rubin; Heather Ross; Robin Green; Susan Abbey; Mary Pat McAndrews; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.318

Review 4.  Optimising GPs' communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of 'safety-netting' in primary care.

Authors:  Claire Friedemann Smith; Hannah Lunn; Geoff Wong; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 7.418

5.  How do GPs and patients share the responsibility for cancer safety netting follow-up actions? A qualitative interview study of GPs and patients in Oxfordshire, UK.

Authors:  Julie Evans; John I Macartney; Clare Bankhead; Charlotte Albury; Daniel Jones; Sue Ziebland; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Safety netting; best practice in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Sue Greenhalgh; Laura M Finucane; Christopher Mercer; James Selfe
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.520

7.  Safety netting in routine primary care consultations: an observational study using video-recorded UK consultations.

Authors:  Peter J Edwards; Matthew J Ridd; Emily Sanderson; Rebecca K Barnes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Promoting integrated care in prostate cancer through online prostate cancer-specific holistic needs assessment: a feasibility study in primary care.

Authors:  Amy L Clarke; Julia Roscoe; Rebecca Appleton; Deepak Parashar; Radha Muthuswamy; Omar Khan; Jeremy Dale; Veronica Nanton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Development of a tool for coding safety-netting behaviours in primary care: a mixed-methods study using existing UK consultation recordings.

Authors:  Peter J Edwards; Matthew J Ridd; Emily Sanderson; Rebecca K Barnes
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Understanding General Practitioners' Antibiotic Prescribing Decisions in Out-of-Hours Primary Care: A Video-Elicitation Interview Study.

Authors:  Annelies Colliers; Samuel Coenen; Katrien Bombeke; Roy Remmen; Hilde Philips; Sibyl Anthierens
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.