Literature DB >> 30509562

Does robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy improve outcomes in patients with high risk morphometric features compared to the open approach.

Patrick R Varley1, Mazen S Zenati2, Andrew Klobuka3, Juliana Tobler3, Ahmad Hamad1, Melissa E Hogg1, Herbert J Zeh1, Amir A Borhani4, Amer H Zureikat5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to investigate whether robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) mitigates adverse outcomes in patients with high-risk morphometric features compared to the open approach (OPD).
METHODS: Morphometric parameters for RPD and OPDs were measured by two blinded radiologists. The morphometric parameter best correlating with adverse outcomes was identified and used in multivariable models to evaluate the impact of surgical approach (open vs. robotic) on outcomes of patients with high-risk morphometric features.
RESULTS: Of 282 PDs available for morphometric analysis, 134 (47.5%) underwent RPD. Average Psoas Density demonstrated the most frequent association with adverse outcomes, with correlations to prolonged LOS (ρ= -0.154, p=0.01), severe complications (ρ= -0.159, p=0.007), readmission (ρ= -0.16, p=0.007), and discharge to home (ρ= 0.2, p<0.001). On multivariable analysis of patients with high-risk morphometric features (defined as APD ≤ 50th percentile), RPD was associated with a reduction in the likelihood of prolonged LOS (OR 0.27, p = 0.015) and a trend towards discharge home versus a rehab facility or nursing home (OR 2.26, p = 0.061).
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the association between morphometrics and outcomes following PD, and suggests that the robotic approach may be associated with improved outcomes in PD patients with high-risk morphometric features.
Copyright © 2018 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30509562     DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  7 in total

1.  Preoperative Computed Tomography Morphological Features Indicative of Incisional Hernia Formation After Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Phoebe B McAuliffe; Abhishek A Desai; Ankoor A Talwar; Robyn B Broach; Jesse Y Hsu; Joseph M Serletti; Tiange Liu; Yubing Tong; Jayaram K Udupa; Drew A Torigian; John P Fischer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 13.787

2.  Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Alberto Aiolfi; Francesca Lombardo; Gianluca Bonitta; Piergiorgio Danelli; Davide Bona
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-12-14

3.  500 Minimally Invasive Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomies: One Decade of Optimizing Performance.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Joal D Beane; Mazen S Zenati; Amr I Al Abbas; Brian A Boone; A James Moser; David L Bartlett; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 13.787

4.  Determining Hospital Volume Threshold for Safety of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Contemporary Cutpoint Analysis.

Authors:  Patricia C Conroy; Lucia Calthorpe; Joseph A Lin; Sarah Mohamedaly; Alex Kim; Kenzo Hirose; Eric Nakakura; Carlos Corvera; Julie Ann Sosa; Ankit Sarin; Kimberly S Kirkwood; Adnan Alseidi; Mohamed A Adam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 5.  Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Anastomoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis D Kostakis; Harkiran Sran; Raphael Uwechue; Pankaj Chandak; Jonathon Olsburgh; Nizam Mamode; Ioannis Loukopoulos; Nicos Kessaris
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2019-12-23

6.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy provides better histopathological outcomes as compared to its open counterpart: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Da Dong; Daniel Moritz Felsenreich; Shekhar Gogna; Aram Rojas; Ethan Zhang; Michael Dong; Asad Azim; Mahir Gachabayov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The current status and future directions of robotic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Kohei Nakata; Masafumi Nakamura
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-03-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.