| Literature DB >> 30509328 |
Ádám Horváth1,2,3, Éva Borbély1,2,3, Kata Bölcskei1,2,3, Nikolett Szentes1,2,3, Tamás Kiss1,2,3, Mátyás Belák1, Tibor Rauch4, Tibor Glant4, Róza Zákány5, Tamás Juhász5, Edina Karanyicz5, Ferenc Boldizsár6, Zsuzsanna Helyes7,8,9, Bálint Botz2,10.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The regulatory role of capsaicin-sensitive peptidergic sensory nerves has been shown in acute inflammation, but little is known about their involvement in T/B-cell driven autoimmune arthritis. This study integratively characterized the function of these nerve endings in the proteoglycan-induced chronic arthritis (PGIA), a translational model of rheumatoid arthritis.Entities:
Keywords: Experimental arthritis; Mouse model; Neurogenic inflammation; Nociception; Rheumatoid arthritis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30509328 PMCID: PMC6276168 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-018-1364-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Fig. 1Diminished mechanical hyperalgesia, edema, and arthritis severity score, but retained grasping ability after sensory desensitization. The changes of the hind paw mechanonociceptive threshold (a), grasping ability (b), hind limb edema (c), and the semiquantitative arthritis severity score (d). Values are the means ± SEM, n = 7–8/group. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 vs. respective non-arthritic controls, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. non-desensitized arthritic mice. Grasping ability was assessed by log rank test, all other functional results by repeated measures two-way ANOVA
Fig. 2Lower MPO activity in the acute, but greater in the chronic phase of arthritis, without vascular leakage alterations after sensory desensitization. Representative 2D bioluminescence images of MPO activity (a), and the quantification of the luminescence in the hind limbs (b). Representative 2D fluorescence images of vascular leakage (c), and the quantitative evaluation of fluorescence (d). Values are the means ± SEM, n = 7–8/group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. respective non-arthritic controls, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. non-desensitized arthritic mice. Repeated measures two-way ANOVA was used
Fig. 3Arthritic bone turnover increase is unaltered after sensory desensitization. Representative 2D epifluorescence images of the spine (a), and the quantification of OsteoSense fluorescence (b). Representative 3D FMT reconstructions of the ankle joints (c) and the quantification of the amount of fluorophore in picomols (d). Values are the means ± SEM, n = 5–6/group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. respective non-arthritic control. One-way ANOVA was used
Fig. 4Increased trabecular thickness in the arthritic ankle joint, but unaltered bone spur formation and porosity after sensory desensitization. Changes in bone volume and surface density (BV/TV, BS/TV) (a), trabecular thickness, and total pore volume (b). Representative 3D CT reconstructions of ankle joints (c) and axial CT slices (d) demonstrating cortical bone loss and osteophyte formation (cortical irregularities highlighted by arrowheads). Values are the means ± SEM, n = 7–8/group. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 vs. respective non-arthritic control, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. respective initial control. Two-way ANOVA was used
Fig. 5Increased intertarsal cartilage thickness after sensory desensitization. Average thickness of cartilage (μm) (a). Representative photomicrographs of the intertarsal joints (b). Values are the means ± SEM, n = 7–8/group, ###p < 0.001 vs. respective non-desensitized group. One-way ANOVA was used
Fig. 6Increased bony ankylosis and unaltered spinal bone remodeling after sensory desensitization. Quantification of bone volume and surface densities (BV/TV, BS/TV) (a), total pore volume and the number of trabeculae (b). Quantification of the mean intervertebral space, and representative axial CT slices (c). Representative 3D reconstructions of the lumbar spine (d). Values are the means ± SEM, n = 7–8/group. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. respective non-arthritic control. One-way ANOVA was used