| Literature DB >> 30509199 |
Zhifeng Chen1, Kara S Cox1, Aimin Tang1, Jeanette Roman2, Malorie Fink2, Robin M Kaufhold1, Liming Guan2, Andy Xie1, Melissa A Boddicker1, Debra Mcguinness1, Xiao Xiao1, Hualin Li1, Julie M Skinner1, Thorsten Verch2, Mary Retzlaff2, Kalpit A Vora3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading infectious cause of hospitalization. A few vaccines exist to prevent pneumococcal disease in adults, including a pneumococcal polysaccharide unconjugated vaccine and a protein conjugated polysaccharide vaccine. Previous studies on the human immune response to the unconjugated vaccine showed that the vaccine boosted the existing memory B cells. In the present study, we investigated the human B cell immune response following pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccination.Entities:
Keywords: Human; Monoclonal antibodies; Plasmablast B cell; Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30509199 PMCID: PMC6278343 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-3517-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Germline usage analysis for single plasmablast-derived antigen-specific mAbs
| Antibody ID | Serotype(s) | VH | DH | JH | VL | JL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family | CDR3 Length | HCDR3 AA sequence | Family | Family | Family | CDR3 length | LCDR3 AA sequence | Family | ||
| 1A4 | 1 | 3–23*04 | 10 | DVRGSGSNSY | 3–10*01 | 4*02 | K2–30*01 | 9 | MQGTYWPPIT | KJ2*01 |
| 1C6 | 1 | 3–53*01 | 8 | EVDYAFDP | 3–16*01 | 5*02 | L8–61*01 | 10 | VLFMGSGTWV | LJ3*02 |
| 1D4 | 1 | 3–74*03 | 8 | SASGWYVN | 6–19*01 | 4*02 | K4–1*01 | 9 | QHYASVPWT | KJ1*01 |
| 1A6 6 total | 4 | 3–30-3*01 | 10 | DPDTSNKIDY | 2–2*02 | 4*02 | K2–30*01 | 10 | MQGTYWPPIT | KJ5*01 |
| 1A10 | 4 | 3–7*01 | 10 | RMFGSSFRDY | 6–6*01 | 4*02 | L2–14*01 | 10 | NSYTSSKTWV | LJ3*02 |
| 1B1 | 4 | 1–46*01 | 16 | GGLLPGVAGATSPFQH | 2–2*01 | 1*01 | K3–20*01 | 9 | QRYGSSPVT | KJ4*01 |
| 1C3 | 4 | 3–23*01 | 12 | GPVLPAPKEFDY | 2–15*01 | 4*02 | L4–69*01 | 10 | QTWDTVTNWV | LJ3*02 |
| 1C4 2 total | 6A, 6B | 3–7*03 | 8 | EEWYRFDY | 3–3*02 | 4*02 | L2–8*01 | 10 | SSHAGSKNVI | LJ2*01 |
| 1D7 | 6A, 6B | 3–7*01 | 8 | EIWFREDY | 3–10*01 | 4*02 | L2–8*01 | 10 | GSRVGSNSVV | LJ2*01 |
| 1A2 | 7F | 3–33*01 | 14 | EPRAIADNYYGMDV | 3–3*01 | 6*02 | L10–54*01 | 11 | SAWDSSLNAWV | LJ3*02 |
| 1B2 2 total | 18C | 3–7*01 | 9 | LGGWRHLDY | 3–16*02 | 4*02 | K1–39*01 | 9 | QQSYSSPYT | KJ2*01 |
Fig. 1mAbs from PCV13-induced plasmablast B cells reactive to individual polysaccharide antigens. A two-day polysaccharide-specific sandwich ELISA was used to identify polysaccharide-binding mAbs . mAb 1A2 is reactive to polysaccharide type 7F. mAb 1A4, 1C6, 1D4 are reactive to polysaccharide type 1. mAb 1A6, 1A10, 1B4, 1C3 are reactive to polysaccharide type 4. mAb 1B2 is reactive to polysaccharide type 18C, and mAb 1C4, 1D7 are reactive to polysaccharide types 6A and 6B
Analysis of replacement (R) and silent (S) mutations in heavy and light chain variable regions of single plasmablast-derived mAbs
| Antibody ID | Number of clones | VH | VL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total NT substitution (%) | R/S ratio in Frame work | R/S ratio in CDR regions | Strong Selection On HCDR | Total NT substitution (%) | R/S ratio in Frame work | R/S ratio in CDR regions | Strong Selection on LCDR | ||
| 1A2 | 1 | 6.08% | 4/2 | 10/2 | Yes | 0.34% | 0/0 | 1/0 | No |
| 1A4 | 1 | 6.08% | 3 /4 | 11/0 | Yes | 2.05% | 1/0 | 4/1 | Yes |
| 1A6 | 6 | 8.59% | 7/2 | 15/1 | Yes | 3.97% | 2/1 | 8/1 | Yes |
| 1A10 | 1 | 6.46% | 5/5 | 7/2 | Yes | 2.72% | 0/1 | 7/0 | Yes |
| 1B1 | 1 | 1.36% | 2/1 | 1/0 | No | 1.04% | 0/0 | 3/0 | No |
| 1B2 | 2 | 4.42% | 2/2 | 8/1 | Yes | 2.82% | 3/0 | 4/0 | Yes |
| 1C3 | 1 | 5.78% | 4/2 | 11/0 | Yes | 2.03% | 1/1 | 4/0 | Yes |
| 1C4 | 2 | 5.48% | 2/1 | 12/1 | Yes | 2.38% | 5/2 | 0/0 | No |
| 1C6 | 1 | 3.75% | 1 /2 | 8/0 | Yes | 2.37% | 0/1 | 5/1 | Yes |
| 1D4 | 1 | 6.16% | 5/4 | 9/0 | Yes | 3.64% | 0/3 | 8/0 | Yes |
| 1D7 | 1 | 7.43% | 5/3 | 14/0 | Yes | 2.74% | 0/1 | 6/1 | Yes |
Note: Antigen-driven selection on HCDR and LCDR regions was judged based on somatic mutation analysis method developed by Shlomchik M et al. [27]
OPK activities of mAbs (EC50, ng/ml)
| MOPA assay killing Pneumococcal serotypes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serotype | mAb | T4 | T6b | T14 | T23f | T18c | T19f | T9v | T6a | T1 | T3 | T5 | T6c | T7F | T19A | T22F | T33F |
| T4 | 1A6 | 29 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| T4 | 1A10 | 55 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| T4 | 1B1 | 23 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| T18C | 1B2 | – | – | – | 47 | – | – | – | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | |
| T1 | 1C6 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 14 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| T7F | 1A2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | – | – | – | – | 11 | – | – | – |
| T6a,b | 1C4 | – | 37 | – | – | – | – | – | 100 | – | – | – | 142 | – | – | – | – |
| T6a, b | 1D7 | – | 355 | – | – | – | – | – | 334 | – | – | – | 2247 | – | – | – | – |
Note: - = no activity in MOPA assay (EC50 > 7500 ng/ml) [12]. ND = not tested. mAb serotype was determined by ELISA binding
Fig. 2S. pneumoniae serotype 4-specific mAb protects mice from S. pneumoniae serotype 4 challenge. a Survival rate of each treatment group at 96 h post-infection. Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was performed. Each group was compared to No Antibody Treatment Group. * p < 0.05, statistically significant difference. b Mean weight of survivors in each group at 0, 24, 48, 72 h post-infection. c Bacteremia of each animal at 48 h post-infection. Individual raw data plotted on Log10 scale with geometric mean and 95% CI. Transformed data analyzed by One-way ANOVA with Dunnett post test to evaluate for significant reduction in blood CFU counts (compared to No Antibody Treatment Group), *** p < 0.001, highly statistically significant difference