Literature DB >> 30508077

Preoperative endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation decreases the rate of delayed gastric emptying after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

E Hadzijusufovic1, E Tagkalos1, H Neumann2, B Babic1, S Heinrich1, H Lang1, P P Grimminger1.   

Abstract

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy occurs postoperatively in up to 50% of the patients. This pyloric dysfunction can lead to severe secondary complications postoperatively such as early aspiration, pneumonia or may even have an impact on anastomotic healing and therefore leakage. Early detection of DGE is essential to prevent further complications. The common treatment postoperatively is endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation (EPBD) after symptoms already occurred. In our work, we analyzed patients who received a preoperative EPBD during the routine restaging endoscopy and compared those patients to a control group to analyze if preoperative EPBD may prevent postoperative DGE and secondary additional complications. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of 115 patients who received an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy by the same surgeon between June 2015 and October 2017. Out of these 115 patients, 91 (79.1%) patients received EPBD preoperatively during the staging/restaging endoscopy (PDG, pyloric dilatation group). In 24 (20.9%) patients, preoperative EPBD was not performed due to stenotic esophageal tumors or logistic reasons (NDG, non-pyloric dilatation group). Data of the PDG and NDG group were compared regarding the rate of postoperative DGE as well as DGE and EPBD related complications. In total, 21 (18.3%) patients developed pyloric dysfunction requiring a total of 27 EPBD during follow-up. There were 12 (13.2%) patients in the PDG and 9 (37.5%) patients in the NDG (p = 0.014), respectively. DGE-related complications such as anastomotic leaks (p = 0.466), pulmonary complications (p = 0.466) and longer median hospital stay (p = 0.685) were more frequent in the NDG group; however this difference did not reach statistical significance. The success rate for postoperative EPBD with 20-mm balloons was lower (58.5%) compared to the usage of 30-mm balloons (93.3%). All pre- and postoperative EPBD were performed without any complications. Preoperative EPBD is feasible, safe and can be combined with restating endoscopy. It seems that preoperative EPBD reduces the incidence of DGE and can prevent the need for early postoperative endoscopic interventions. Our recommendation is therefore to perform an EPBD preoperatively when possible to reduce postoperative complications to a minimum. For postoperative EPBD, we recommend the use of the 30-mm balloon due to lower redilatation rates.
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ivor–Lewis; gastric emptying; gastric pull-up; minimally invasive esophagectomy; pneumatic dilatation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30508077     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

1.  Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Xiang Mei; Guan-Biao Liang; Lei Dai; Yong-Yong Wang; Ming-Wu Chen; Jun-Xian Mo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.359

2.  State of the art in esophagectomy: robotic assistance in the abdominal phase.

Authors:  Eline M de Groot; Lucas Goense; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-12-31

3.  Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy with Intrathoracic Anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): Promising Results in 100 Consecutive Patients (the European Experience).

Authors:  Pieter Christiaan van der Sluis; Evangelos Tagkalos; Edin Hadzijusufovic; Benjamin Babic; Eren Uzun; Richard van Hillegersberg; Hauke Lang; Peter Philipp Grimminger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  There is no correlation between a delayed gastric conduit emptying and the occurrence of an anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin Babic; Lars Mortimer Schiffmann; Hans Friedrich Fuchs; Dolores Thea Mueller; Thomas Schmidt; Christoph Mallmann; Laura Mielke; Antonia Frebel; Petra Schiller; Marc Bludau; Seung-Hun Chon; Wolfgang Schroeder; Christiane Josephine Bruns
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.

Authors:  E Tagkalos; P C van der Sluis; E Uzun; F Berlth; J Staubitz; I Gockel; R van Hillegersberg; H Lang; Peter P Grimminger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Initial introduction of robot-assisted, minimally invasive esophagectomy using the microanatomy-based concept in the upper mediastinum.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Shirakawa; Kazuhiro Noma; Tomoyoshi Kunitomo; Masashi Hashimoto; Naoaki Maeda; Shunsuke Tanabe; Kazufumi Sakurama; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.