Timothy Dignam1, Rachel B Kaufmann, Lauren LeStourgeon, Mary Jean Brown. 1. Lead Poisoning Prevention and Environmental Health Tracking Branch (Dr Dignam) and National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (Dr Kaufmann), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia (Ms LeStourgeon); and Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Dr Brown).
Abstract
CONTEXT: During the past 45 years, exposure to lead has declined dramatically in the United States. This sustained decline is measured by blood and environmental lead levels and achieved through control of lead sources, emission reductions, federal regulations, and applied public health efforts. OBJECTIVE: Explore regulatory factors that contributed to the decrease in exposure to lead among the US population since 1970. DESIGN/ SETTING: We present historical information about the control of lead sources and the reduction of emissions through regulatory and selected applied public health efforts, which have contributed to decreases in lead exposure in the United States. Sources of lead exposure, exposure pathways, blood lead measurements, and special populations at risk are described. RESULTS: From 1976-1980 to 2015-2016, the geometric mean blood lead level (BLL) of the US population aged 1 to 74 years dropped from 12.8 to 0.82 μg/dL, a decline of 93.6%. Yet, an estimated 500 000 children aged 1 to 5 years have BLLs at or above the blood lead reference value of 5 μg/dL established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Low levels of exposure can lead to adverse health effects. There is no safe level of lead exposure, and child BLLs less than 10 μg/dL are known to adversely affect IQ and behavior. When the exposure source is known, approximately 95% of BLLs of 25 μg/dL or higher are work-related among US adults. Despite much progress in reducing exposure to lead in the United States, there are challenges to eliminating exposure. CONCLUSIONS: There are future challenges, particularly from the inequitable distribution of lead hazards among some communities. Maintaining federal, state, and local capacity to identify and respond to populations at high risk can help eliminate lead exposure as a public health problem. The results of this review show that the use of strong evidence-based programs and practices, as well as regulatory authority, can help control or eliminate lead hazards before children and adults are exposed.
CONTEXT: During the past 45 years, exposure to lead has declined dramatically in the United States. This sustained decline is measured by blood and environmental lead levels and achieved through control of lead sources, emission reductions, federal regulations, and applied public health efforts. OBJECTIVE: Explore regulatory factors that contributed to the decrease in exposure to lead among the US population since 1970. DESIGN/ SETTING: We present historical information about the control of lead sources and the reduction of emissions through regulatory and selected applied public health efforts, which have contributed to decreases in lead exposure in the United States. Sources of lead exposure, exposure pathways, blood lead measurements, and special populations at risk are described. RESULTS: From 1976-1980 to 2015-2016, the geometric mean blood lead level (BLL) of the US population aged 1 to 74 years dropped from 12.8 to 0.82 μg/dL, a decline of 93.6%. Yet, an estimated 500 000 children aged 1 to 5 years have BLLs at or above the blood lead reference value of 5 μg/dL established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Low levels of exposure can lead to adverse health effects. There is no safe level of lead exposure, and child BLLs less than 10 μg/dL are known to adversely affect IQ and behavior. When the exposure source is known, approximately 95% of BLLs of 25 μg/dL or higher are work-related among US adults. Despite much progress in reducing exposure to lead in the United States, there are challenges to eliminating exposure. CONCLUSIONS: There are future challenges, particularly from the inequitable distribution of lead hazards among some communities. Maintaining federal, state, and local capacity to identify and respond to populations at high risk can help eliminate lead exposure as a public health problem. The results of this review show that the use of strong evidence-based programs and practices, as well as regulatory authority, can help control or eliminate lead hazards before children and adults are exposed.
Authors: Timothy A Dignam; Anne Evens; Eduard Eduardo; Shokufeh M Ramirez; Kathleen L Caldwell; Nikki Kilpatrick; Gary P Noonan; W Dana Flanders; Pamela A Meyer; Michael A McGeehin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: SangWoo Tak; Robert J Roscoe; Walter Alarcon; Jun Ju; John P Sestito; Aaron L Sussell; Geoffrey M Calvert Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Rachel N Plotinsky; Masja Straetemans; Lee-Yang Wong; Mary Jean Brown; Timothy Dignam; W Dana Flanders; Megan Tehan; Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner; Richard Dipentima; Elizabeth A Talbot Journal: Environ Res Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Cheryl R Cornwell; Kathryn B Egan; Hatice S Zahran; Maria C Mirabelli; Joy Hsu; Ginger L Chew Journal: Pediatr Allergy Immunol Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 6.377
Authors: Ted Schwaba; Wiebke Bleidorn; Christopher J Hopwood; Jochen E Gebauer; P Jason Rentfrow; Jeff Potter; Samuel D Gosling Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Carmen M Dickinson-Copeland; Lilly Cheng Immergluck; Maria Britez; Fengxia Yan; Ruijin Geng; Mike Edelson; Salathiel R Kendrick-Allwood; Katarzyna Kordas Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Marziyeh Nazari; Abbas Amini; Nathan T Eden; Mikel C Duke; Chun Cheng; Matthew R Hill Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 5.923