BACKGROUND: The fasting-state serum bile acid profile in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been reported to differ when nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is compared to nonalcoholic fatty liver. However, there are few data comparing changes in NAFLD vs non-NAFLD, or whether the bile acid profile differs according to the degree of fibrosis. AIM: To examine the serum bile acid profile across the entire spectrum of NAFLD. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of two complementary cohorts: a Twin and Family cohort of 156 participants, and a biopsy-proven-NAFLD cohort of 156 participants with fasting bile acid profiling using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. RESULTS: In the Twin and Family cohort (mean age 46.3 years and body mass index (BMI) 26.6 kg/m2 ), 36 (23%) participants had NAFLD (magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction ≥ 5%). Higher chenodeoxycholyl conjugates (9.0% vs 6.5%, P = 0.019) and lower glycohyocholate (1.2% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001) were observed in NAFLD compared to non-NAFLD-controls. In the biopsy-proven-NAFLD cohort (mean age 49.8 years, BMI 32.0 kg/m2 ), no differences in total bile acid were seen between nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. The total unconjugated bile acid significantly decreased across nonalcoholic steatohepatitis categories (P = 0.044). The distribution of stage of fibrosis was F0: 42.3%, F1: 32.7%, F2: 10.3%, F3: 8.3% and F4: 6.4%. The total serum bile acid increased with increase in fibrosis stage (P < 0.001). The primary conjugated bile acid proportion increased (P < 0.001) whereas unconjugated bile acid (P = 0.006), unconjugated cholyl (P < 0.001) and chenodeoxycholyl conjugates (P < 0.002) significantly decreased with increase in liver fibrosis stage. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting-state serum bile acid profile alterations are seen across the entire spectrum of NAFLD. The total serum bile acids did not differ significantly between NAFLD vs non-NAFLD and nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, but were significantly perturbed progressively as liver fibrosis increases.
BACKGROUND: The fasting-state serum bile acid profile in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been reported to differ when nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is compared to nonalcoholic fatty liver. However, there are few data comparing changes in NAFLD vs non-NAFLD, or whether the bile acid profile differs according to the degree of fibrosis. AIM: To examine the serum bile acid profile across the entire spectrum of NAFLD. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of two complementary cohorts: a Twin and Family cohort of 156 participants, and a biopsy-proven-NAFLD cohort of 156 participants with fasting bile acid profiling using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. RESULTS: In the Twin and Family cohort (mean age 46.3 years and body mass index (BMI) 26.6 kg/m2 ), 36 (23%) participants had NAFLD (magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction ≥ 5%). Higher chenodeoxycholyl conjugates (9.0% vs 6.5%, P = 0.019) and lower glycohyocholate (1.2% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001) were observed in NAFLD compared to non-NAFLD-controls. In the biopsy-proven-NAFLD cohort (mean age 49.8 years, BMI 32.0 kg/m2 ), no differences in total bile acid were seen between nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. The total unconjugated bile acid significantly decreased across nonalcoholic steatohepatitis categories (P = 0.044). The distribution of stage of fibrosis was F0: 42.3%, F1: 32.7%, F2: 10.3%, F3: 8.3% and F4: 6.4%. The total serum bile acid increased with increase in fibrosis stage (P < 0.001). The primary conjugated bile acid proportion increased (P < 0.001) whereas unconjugated bile acid (P = 0.006), unconjugated cholyl (P < 0.001) and chenodeoxycholyl conjugates (P < 0.002) significantly decreased with increase in liver fibrosis stage. CONCLUSIONS: Fasting-state serum bile acid profile alterations are seen across the entire spectrum of NAFLD. The total serum bile acids did not differ significantly between NAFLD vs non-NAFLD and nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, but were significantly perturbed progressively as liver fibrosis increases.
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Thuy-Anh Le; Joshua Chen; Christopher Changchien; Michael R Peterson; Yuko Kono; Heather Patton; Benjamin L Cohen; David Brenner; Claude Sirlin; Rohit Loomba Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-07-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Alvaro Rivera-Andrade; Jessica L Petrick; Christian S Alvarez; Barry I Graubard; Andrea A Florio; Maria F Kroker-Lobos; Dominick Parisi; Neal D Freedman; Mariana Lazo; Eliseo Guallar; John D Groopman; Manuel Ramirez-Zea; Katherine A McGlynn Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 9.524
Authors: Giovanni Targher; Kathleen E Corey; Christopher D Byrne; Michael Roden Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Nisreen Nimer; Ibrahim Choucair; Zeneng Wang; Ina Nemet; Lin Li; Janet Gukasyan; Taylor L Weeks; Naim Alkhouri; Nizar Zein; W H Wilson Tang; Michael A Fischbach; J Mark Brown; Hooman Allayee; Srinivasan Dasarathy; Valentin Gogonea; Stanley L Hazen Journal: Metabolism Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 8.694
Authors: Cyrielle Caussy; Jen-Chieh Chuang; Andrew Billin; Tao Hu; Ya Wang; G Mani Subramanian; C Stephen Djedjos; Robert P Myers; Edward A Dennis; Rohit Loomba Journal: Therap Adv Gastroenterol Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 4.409
Authors: Suet Ying Kwan; Jingjing Jiao; Jonathan Qi; Ying Wang; Peng Wei; Joseph B McCormick; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Laura Beretta Journal: Hepatol Commun Date: 2020-03-19