Endocannabinoids promote energy conservation in obesity, whereas cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1 R) blockade reverses body weight gain and insulin resistance and increases energy expenditure. Here we investigated the molecular mechanisms of the catabolic effects of CB1 R blockade in the liver. Exposure of primary mouse hepatocytes and HepG2 cells to the CB1 R agonist arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide inhibited the expression of Sirtuin-1 (Sirt1) and Rictor, a component of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) and suppressed insulin-induced Akt phosphorylation at serine 473. These effects were reversed by peripheral CB1 R antagonist JD5037 in control hepatocytes but not in hepatocytes deficient in Sirt1 and/or Rictor, indicating that these two proteins are required for the CB1 R-mediated inhibition of insulin signaling. Feeding C57BL/6J mice a high-fat diet (HFD) inhibited hepatic Sirt1/mTORC2/Akt signaling, and the inhibition was reversed by rimonabant or JD5037 in wild-type but not liver-specific Sirt1-/- (Sirt1-LKO) mice, to levels observed in hepatocyte-specific CB1 R-/- mice. A similar attenuation of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in wild-type mice with obesity but not in Sirt1-LKO mice could be attributed to insufficient reversal of HFD-induced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation in peripheral tissues in the latter. In contrast, JD5037 treatment was equally effective in HFD-fed wild-type and Sirt1-LKO mice in reducing hepatic steatosis, increasing fatty acid β-oxidation, and activating 5'adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) through liver kinase B1 (LKB1), resulting in a similar increase in total energy expenditure in the two strains. Conclusion: Peripheral CB1 R blockade in mice with obesity improves glycemic control through the hepatic Sirt1/mTORC2/Akt pathway, whereas it increases fatty acid oxidation through LKB1/AMPK signaling. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Endocannabinoids promote energy conservation in obesity, whereas cannabinoid-1 receptor (CB1 R) blockade reverses body weight gain and insulin resistance and increases energy expenditure. Here we investigated the molecular mechanisms of the catabolic effects of CB1 R blockade in the liver. Exposure of primary mouse hepatocytes and HepG2 cells to the CB1 R agonist arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide inhibited the expression of Sirtuin-1 (Sirt1) and Rictor, a component of mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) and suppressed insulin-induced Akt phosphorylation at serine 473. These effects were reversed by peripheral CB1 R antagonist JD5037 in control hepatocytes but not in hepatocytes deficient in Sirt1 and/or Rictor, indicating that these two proteins are required for the CB1 R-mediated inhibition of insulin signaling. Feeding C57BL/6J mice a high-fat diet (HFD) inhibited hepatic Sirt1/mTORC2/Akt signaling, and the inhibition was reversed by rimonabant or JD5037 in wild-type but not liver-specific Sirt1-/- (Sirt1-LKO) mice, to levels observed in hepatocyte-specific CB1 R-/- mice. A similar attenuation of hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in wild-type mice with obesity but not in Sirt1-LKO mice could be attributed to insufficient reversal of HFD-induced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation in peripheral tissues in the latter. In contrast, JD5037 treatment was equally effective in HFD-fed wild-type and Sirt1-LKO mice in reducing hepatic steatosis, increasing fatty acid β-oxidation, and activating 5'adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) through liver kinase B1 (LKB1), resulting in a similar increase in total energy expenditure in the two strains. Conclusion: Peripheral CB1 R blockade in mice with obesity improves glycemic control through the hepatic Sirt1/mTORC2/Akt pathway, whereas it increases fatty acid oxidation through LKB1/AMPK signaling. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors: Douglas Osei-Hyiaman; Michael DePetrillo; Pál Pacher; Jie Liu; Svetlana Radaeva; Sándor Bátkai; Judith Harvey-White; Ken Mackie; László Offertáler; Lei Wang; George Kunos Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: V Di Marzo; S K Goparaju; L Wang; J Liu; S Bátkai; Z Járai; F Fezza; G I Miura; R D Palmiter; T Sugiura; G Kunos Journal: Nature Date: 2001-04-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Blerina Kola; Erika Hubina; Sonia A Tucci; Tim C Kirkham; Edwin A Garcia; Sharon E Mitchell; Lynda M Williams; Simon A Hawley; D Grahame Hardie; Ashley B Grossman; Márta Korbonits Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Simeng Wang; Qingzhang Zhu; Guosheng Liang; Tania Franks; Magalie Boucher; Kendra K Bence; Mingjian Lu; Carlos M Castorena; Shangang Zhao; Joel K Elmquist; Philipp E Scherer; Jay D Horton Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 19.456
Authors: Karla Johanna Ruth Hoyer-Allo; Martin Richard Späth; Ruth Hanssen; Marc Johnsen; Susanne Brodesser; Kathrin Kaufmann; Katharina Kiefer; Felix Carlo Koehler; Heike Göbel; Torsten Kubacki; Franziska Grundmann; Bernhard Schermer; Jens Brüning; Thomas Benzing; Volker Burst; Roman-Ulrich Müller Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Shahar Azar; Shiran Udi; Adi Drori; Rivka Hadar; Alina Nemirovski; Kiran V Vemuri; Maya Miller; Dana Sherill-Rofe; Yhara Arad; Devorah Gur-Wahnon; Xiaoling Li; Alexandros Makriyannis; Danny Ben-Zvi; Yuval Tabach; Iddo Z Ben-Dov; Joseph Tam Journal: Mol Metab Date: 2020-09-26 Impact factor: 7.422