| Literature DB >> 30506493 |
Marie Fukutake1, Daigo Ochiai2, Hirotaka Masuda1, Yushi Abe1, Yu Sato1, Toshimitsu Otani1, Shigeki Sakai3, Noriko Aramaki-Hattori3, Masayuki Shimoda4, Tadashi Matsumoto1, Kei Miyakoshi1, Yae Kanai4, Kazuo Kishi3, Mamoru Tanaka1.
Abstract
Adult wound healing can result in fibrotic scarring (FS) characterized by excess expression of myofibroblasts and increased type I/type III collagen expression. In contrast, fetal wound healing results in complete regeneration without FS, and the mechanism remains unclear. Amniotic fluid cells could contribute to scar-free wound healing, but the effects of human amniotic fluid cells are not well characterized. Here, we determined the effect of human amniotic fluid stem cells (hAFS) on FS during wound healing. Human amniotic fluid was obtained by amniocentesis at 15-17 weeks of gestation. CD117-positive cells were isolated and defined as hAFS. hAFS (1 × 106) suspended in PBS or cell-free PBS were injected around wounds created in the dorsal region of BALB/c mice. Wound size was macroscopically measured, and re-epithelialization in the epidermis, granulation tissue area in the dermis and collagen contents in the regenerated wound were histologically analyzed. The ability of hAFS to engraft in the wound was assessed by tracking hAFS labeled with PKH-26. hAFS fulfilled the minimal criteria for mesenchymal stem cells. hAFS injection into the wound accelerated wound closure via enhancement of re-epithelialization with less FS. The process was characterized by lower numbers of myofibroblasts and higher expression of type III collagen. Finally, transplanted hAFS were clearly observed in the dermis until day 7 implying that hAFS worked in a paracrine manner. hAFS can function in a paracrine manner to accelerate cutaneous wound healing, producing less FS, a process resembling fetal wound healing.Entities:
Keywords: Epithelialization; Fibrosis; Human amniotic fluid stem cell; Scar formation; Wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30506493 DOI: 10.1007/s13577-018-0222-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Cell ISSN: 0914-7470 Impact factor: 4.174