Literature DB >> 30505595

Can we downstage locally advanced pancreatic cancer to resectable? A phase I/II study of induction oxaliplatin and 5-FU chemoradiation.

Salvatore Amodeo1, Antonio Masi1,2, Marcovalerio Melis1,2, Theresa Ryan3, Howard S Hochster3, Deirdre J Cohen3, Anurag Chandra3, H Leon Pachter1, Elliot Newman1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Half of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PC) present with regionally advanced disease. This includes borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable tumors as defined by current NCCN guidelines for resectability. Chemoradiation (CH-RT) is used in this setting in attempt to control local disease, and possibly downstage to resectable disease. We report a phase I/II trial of a combination of 5FU/Oxaliplatin with concurrent radiation in patients presenting with borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: Patients with biopsy-proven borderline resectable or locally advanced unresectable PC were eligible. Chemotherapy included continuous infusion 5FU (200 mg/m2) daily and oxaliplatin weekly for 5 weeks in dose escalation cohorts, ranging from 30 to 60 mg/m2. Concurrent radiation therapy consisted of 4,500 cGy in 25 fractions (180 cGy/fx/d) followed by a comedown to the tumor and margins for an additional 540 cGy ×3 (total dose 5,040 cGy in 28 fractions). Following completion of CH-RT, patients deemed resectable underwent surgery; those who remained unresectable for cure but did not progress (SD, stable disease) received mFOLFOX6 ×6 cycles. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. End-points of the phase II portion were resectability and overall survival.
RESULTS: Overall, 24 subjects (15 men and 9 women, mean age 64.5 years) were enrolled between June 2004 and December 2009 and received CH-RT. Seventeen patients were enrolled in the Phase I component of the study, fifteen of whom completed neoadjuvant therapy. Reasons for not completing treatment included grade 3 toxicities (1 patient) and withdrawal of consent (1 patient). The highest dose of oxaliplatin (60 mg/m2) was well tolerated and it was used as the recommended phase II dose. An additional 7 patients were treated in the phase II portion, 5 of whom completed CH-RT; the remaining 2 patients did not complete treatment because of grade 3 toxicities. Overall, 4/24 did not complete CH-RT. Grade 4 toxicities related to initial CH-RT were observed during phase I (n=2, pulmonary embolism and lymphopenia) and phase II (n=3, fatigue, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia). Following restaging after completion of CH-RT, 4 patients had progressed (PD); 9 patients had SD and received additional chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 (one of them had a dramatic response after two cycles and underwent curative resection); the remaining 7 patients (29.2%) were noted to have a response and were explored: 2 had PD, 4 had SD, still unresectable, and 1 patient was resected for cure with negative margins. Overall 2 patients (8.3%) in the study received curative resection following neoadjuvant therapy. Median overall survival for the entire study population was 11.4 months. Overall survival for the two resected patients was 41.7 and 21.6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined modality treatment for borderline resectable and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer with oxaliplatin, 5FU and radiation was reasonably well tolerated. The majority of patients remained unresectable. Survival data with this regimen were comparable to others for locally advanced pancreas cancer, suggesting the need for more novel approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-FU; Pancreas cancer; neoadjuvant treatment; radiochemotherapy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505595      PMCID: PMC6219979          DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2017.10.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  44 in total

1.  Molecular modeling of the intrastrand guanine-guanine DNA adducts produced by cisplatin and oxaliplatin.

Authors:  E D Scheeff; J M Briggs; S B Howell
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 2.  FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mustafa Suker; Berend R Beumer; Eran Sadot; Lysiane Marthey; Jason E Faris; Eric A Mellon; Bassel F El-Rayes; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Jill Lacy; Peter J Hosein; Sing Yu Moorcraft; Thierry Conroy; Florian Hohla; Peter Allen; Julien Taieb; Theodore S Hong; Ravi Shridhar; Ian Chau; Casper H van Eijck; Bas Groot Koerkamp
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Giovanni Marchegiani; Theodore S Hong; David P Ryan; Vikram Deshpande; Erin I McDonnell; Francesco Sabbatino; Daniela Dias Santos; Jill N Allen; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Jeffrey W Clark; Jason E Faris; Lipika Goyal; Eunice L Kwak; Janet E Murphy; David T Ting; Jennifer Y Wo; Andrew X Zhu; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Neoadjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced unresectable (LAPC) and borderline resectable (BRPC) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  Marlo Blazer; Christina Wu; Richard M Goldberg; Gary Phillips; Carl Schmidt; Peter Muscarella; Evan Wuthrick; Terrence M Williams; Joshua Reardon; E Christopher Ellison; Mark Bloomston; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; H van de Velde; P Karasek; H Oettle; W L Vervenne; A Szawlowski; P Schoffski; S Post; C Verslype; H Neumann; H Safran; Y Humblet; J Perez Ruixo; Y Ma; D Von Hoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of an AGEO multicenter prospective observational cohort.

Authors:  L Marthey; A Sa-Cunha; J F Blanc; M Gauthier; A Cueff; E Francois; I Trouilloud; D Malka; J B Bachet; R Coriat; E Terrebonne; C De La Fouchardière; S Manfredi; D Solub; C Lécaille; A Thirot Bidault; F Carbonnel; J Taieb
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.

Authors:  Caio M Rocha Lima; Mark R Green; Robert Rotche; Wilson H Miller; G Mark Jeffrey; Laura A Cisar; Adele Morganti; Nicoletta Orlando; Gabriela Gruia; Langdon L Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Daniel G Haller
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  Oxaliplatin-safety profile: neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Axel Grothey
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.929

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.