Literature DB >> 30505165

Phylogeny and taxonomic synopsis of PoasubgenusPseudopoa (including Eremopoa and Lindbergella) (Poaceae, Poeae, Poinae).

Lynn J Gillespie1,2, Robert John Soreng3, Evren Cabi4, Neda Amiri1,2.   

Abstract

Eremopoa is a small genus of annual grasses distributed from Egypt to western China. Phylogenetic analyses of plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA show that Eremopoa species, together with the monotypic genus Lindbergella and a single species of Poa (P.speluncarum), are nested within the genus Poa, in a clade that we accept as Poasubg.Pseudopoa. Here we accept seven species, four subspecies and four varieties in Poasubg.Pseudopoa. Five new combinations are made: Poaattalica, P.diaphora var. alpina, P.diaphora var. songarica, P.nephelochloides and P.persicasubsp.multiradiata; P.millii is proposed as a replacement name for E.capillaris; and Poa sections Lindbergella and Speluncarae are proposed. We provide a diagnosis for Poasubg.Pseudopoa, synonymy for and a key to the taxa. Eight lectotypes are designated: Eragrostisbarbeyi Post, Eremopoanephelochloides Roshev., Glyceriataurica Steud., Nephelochloatripolitana Boiss. & Blanche, Poacilicensis Hance, Poaparadoxa Kar. & Kir., Poapersicavar.alpina Boiss and Poapersicasubsp.cypria Sam. Eremopoamedica is re-identified as a species of Puccinellia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eremopoa ; Lindbergella ; Poa ; Poaceae ; Annuals; DNA; classification; grasses; phylogeny; taxonomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30505165      PMCID: PMC6256263          DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.111.28081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PhytoKeys        ISSN: 1314-2003            Impact factor:   1.635


Introduction

Roshev. is a small, primarily west and central Asian genus of annual grasses. Roshevitz (1934) named the genus (Greek: eremos = desert, poa = fodder / > bluegrass) and included six species of annuals for the former U.S.S.R. Up to that time, one or more of the taxa had been described or treated in L. (Trinius 1835), Wolf (Post and Autran 1897), L. (Koch 1848), R. Br. (Fischer and Meyer 1841, Steudel 1854), Boiss. (Grisebach 1852, Boissier and Blanche 1859) and L. (Trinius 1830, 1836, Steudel 1854, Boissier 1884, Hackel 1887, Stapf 1897, Ascherson and Graebner 1900). Trin. is the type species of , K. Koch, (K. Koch) Stapf and (K. Koch) Hack. After was described, most authors accepted the genus (Grossheim 1939, Köie 1945, Bor 1960, 1968a, 1970, Pavlov and Gamajunova 1964, Tzvelev 1966, 1976, 1989, Scholz 1980, 1981, Tutin 1980, Czerepanov 1981, 1995, Cope 1982, Mill 1985, Clayton and Renvoize 1986, Watson and Dallwitz 1992, Soreng 2003, Valdés and Scholz 2006, Darbyshire 2007, Cabi and Doğan 2012, Nikiforova et al. 2012). Few taxonomists continued to refer the species to (Samuelsson 1950, Kovalevskaja 1968). No revision of the genus as a whole exists. Roshevitz (1934) differentiated the genus from as: always annuals with long panicle branches arranged in half-whorls; glumes unequal, inferior 1-veined, superior 3-veined; lemmas with obscure keel and lateral veins, apex acuminate or briefly aristate; and callus without lanate hairs. Tzvelev (1976) added the following characteristics: lower glumes 2/7–2/3 the first lemma in length; lemmas somewhat keeled with 5 veins, apex gradually tapering, sometimes with a short cusp, somewhat scabrous due to very short spinules and often pilose in the lower part along the keel and marginal veins; callus obtuse, glabrous or almost glabrous; leaf sheaths closed only at the base and leaf blades flat or loosely folded. The genus is relatively easy to recognise as a set of annuals, whereas has few annuals and those are distinct from species included in . However, none of the characters by themselves actually differentiates from . In , glumes can also be short, the lower one is commonly 1-veined, the upper one normally 3-veined. Lemmas in are usually distinctly keeled, with soft hairs at least on the keel and with an obtuse, acute or acuminate apex. They are rarely weakly keeled (e.g. in sect. ), sometimes glabrous (ca. 15% of spp.) and rarely produce a minute cusp (a cusp occurs more often than acknowledged in the literature, but is usually irregularly expressed). In , a dorsal tuft of hairs on the callus is present in 2/3 of the species. In the other species, the callus is sometimes glabrous or has a minute or more developed crown of hairs around the base of the lemma. In addition, leaf sheaths are only infrequently closed at the base, most being closed more than 1/10 the length, and leaf blade form runs the gamut from flat and thin to tough and involute. Panicle branches in are infrequently whorled with 6 or up to 9 branches per lower node, the normal range is 1 to 5. Although panicle branches are commonly numerous (ranging up to 27) in , with most taxa usually having over 5, (Trin.) Roshev. has 1–5(–7) and (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Roshev. varies widely with (1–)3–8(–12). PageBreak species are annual with some extreme features usually not found in , but, other than abundantly branching panicles, those characteristics are broached in all cases. No one has doubted that was closely related to . The taxa placed in range from Egypt (Sinai and north coast) across the northern Middle East (Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Turkey [Anatolia], Iran), to Afghanistan, Pakistan, northwest India (Himachal Pradesh, Kashmir), western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), north through Transcaucasia into the Caucasus mountains of Russia and across central Asia in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyz Republic and Kazakhstan. Two taxa have been observed elsewhere as waifs: in western Europe (France, Norway) and (Trin.) Roshev. in Canada (see references in Taxonomy section). The geographic region with the most diversity of taxa is clearly Asia Minor; nearly all of the accepted species occur in Turkey. There have been many differences of opinion on the species and infraspecific ranks to accept in (Table 1). Roshevitz (1934) treated six species in his new genus in the former U.S.S.R (, (Regel) Roshev., (Boiss.) Roshev., (Trautv.) Roshev., and ). Tzvelev (1976) reduced these six species to two species, and , with two and three subspecies, respectively, all of which were accepted as species by Czerepanov (1981, 1995). Scholz (1980, 1981) described two new species, H. Scholz from Turkey and H. Scholz from Azerbaijan. The type of (holotype at W, isotype at B) was determined to be a species of Parl. (Soreng pers. obs. 2015). Mill (1985) treated six species in Turkey, including two new species, R.R. Mill and R.R. Mill. Rahmanian et al. (2014) accepted four species in Iran, including and with three varieties.
Table 1.

Classification history of and other taxa here accepted in . Species and infraspecific taxa accepted by Roshevitz (1934) and authors of major floras and the region covered by their treatments are given. The last column provides the corresponding names in accepted here.

Roshevits (1934)Roshevits (in Köie 1945) Bor (1970) Tzvelev (1976, 1983) Cope (1982) Mill (1985) Czerepanov (1995) Zhu et al. (2006) Gabrieljan and Oganesian (2010) Rhamanian et al. (2014)Euro+Med (on-line)Here
USSR SW Iran Iran, Afghanistan, w. Pakistan, n.w. Iraq, s. Turkmenistan, s.e. Azerbaijan USSR Pakistan Turkey USSR China (Xinjiang, Xizang) Armenia Iran Europe, Transcaucasia, Turkey, Levant, North Africa whole range
E. persica E. persica E. persica E. persica E. persica E. persica E. persica E. persica E. persica E. persica Poa persica
var. persica subsp. persica subsp. persica var. persica subsp. persica
var. major
E. multiradiata (= var. songarica) subsp. multiradiata subsp. multiradiata E. multiradiata E. multiradiata E. multiradiata (= persicavar.persica) E. multiradiata subsp. multiradiata
E. altaica E. altaica E. altaica E. altaica P. diaphora E. altaica P. diaphora
subsp. altaica subsp. altaica subsp. diaphora subsp. altaica subsp. diaphora
var. diaphora
E. songarica var. songarica subsp. songarica subsp. songarica E. songarica E. songarica E. songarica var. songarica subsp. songarica var. songarica
E. bellula E. bellula (pp. = altaica, pp = songarica)(= altaica s.l.)(indirectly referenced, not accepted)(pp. = altaica, pp = songarica) E. bellula (= var. alpina?)
P.persicavar.alpina (under oxyglumis)(indirectly referenced, not accepted) var. alpina
E. oxyglumis E. oxyglumis (= var. songarica) subsp. oxyglumis subsp. oxyglumis(=E.songarica) E. oxyglumis subsp. oxyglumis E. oxyglumis E. persica var. oxyglumis subsp. oxyglumis subsp. oxyglumis
E. attalica E. attalica P. attalica
E. capillaris E. capillaris P. millii
E. mardinensis E. mardinensis (= P.persicasubsp.multiradiata)
E. nephelochloides E.nephelochloides (Iran) E. nephelochloides P. nephelochloides
E. medica (= Puccinellia sp.)
P. sintenisii
P. speluncarum
Classification history of and other taxa here accepted in . Species and infraspecific taxa accepted by Roshevitz (1934) and authors of major floras and the region covered by their treatments are given. The last column provides the corresponding names in accepted here. Bor’s genus (Bor 1968b, 1969) comprises a single annual species that is morphologically similar to . It differs from only in having firmer lemmas that are 3-veined and obscurely apiculate and panicles with 1–5 branches that are smooth. (H. Lindb.) Bor was originally published as by Lindberg (1942) and also as by Samuelsson (1950), the type of which is a syntype of Boissier (1884). The species is endemic to Cyprus. The first molecular data on , generated by our lab in 2004/2005, indicated that was nested within . That data was first published by Gillespie et al. (2007) using chloroplast DNA sequences from the trnT-trnL-trnF region. Based on this same data, inclusion of in was already applied in the Flora of China account (Zhu et al. 2006, as (K. Koch) Stapf) and was continued in Gillespie et al. (2008, 2010), Soreng (2004+) and Soreng et al. (2010, 2015a, 2017a). Although nested within , was positioned on a long branch separate from other clades, justifying its recognition as a distinct subgenus, (Gillespie et al. 2007). We published our initial DNA results for only one species of () based on trnT-trnL-trnF and, subsequently, nuclear ribosomal (nrDNA) ITS and ETS sequence data (Gillespie et al. 2007, 2008, 2010, Soreng et al. 2010). We subsequently sequenced two additional plastid regions (matK and rpoB-trnC) and added PageBreakPageBreakdata for (Cabi et al. 2017, as ). A DNA analysis of ITS sequence data by Hoffmann et al. (2013) showed was also nested within near . Since then, we have accumulated nrDNA and plastid sequence data for most of the taxa and and sampled many more species of from Turkey and around the world. Analysis of our accumulated phylogenetic data on is presented here. All taxa were nested well within , and J.R. Edm. and were found to be nested within or sister to the set of species. Here we place these taxa in and present a taxonomic synopsis of all the species and infraspecies, as well as a key to the taxa we currently accept. Further study is needed before a comprehensive revision of the subgenus can be produced.

Methods

Collections of at E and G (except those not available for loan), several from P and two type specimens from BM and B were loaned to RJS at US. Other material was examined by RJS at B, K, LE, P, US and herbaria in Turkey (ANK, ISTE, NKU). Fieldwork in which 38 specimens of were collected by us was conducted in Kyrgyz Republic (RJS 2006) and Turkey (RJS and associates 1994, 2013, 2014, 2015; LJG & RJS and associates 2011; EC was a co-collector on the 2011 to 2015 expeditions). Additional material was obtained from R. Hand () and M. Assadi and M. Amini-Rad (Iranian ). The molecular phylogenetic analysis included 77 samples: 15 , 56 , 1 and 5 outgroup samples (Appendix 1). A diverse set of species was chosen to represent the majority of sections, including all sections in southwest Asia. Outgroup taxa were chosen to include representatives of the two taxa ( L. and L.) and one clade considered most closely related to (Gillespie et al. 2010, Soreng et al. 2015b). Sequences of and the majority of samples, plus many matK and rpoB sequences, are new to this study (Appendix 1). For simplicity, due to the confusing taxonomy and nomenclature, we refer to taxa using names at the species level in the Results, trees and Appendix 1 (see Table 1 for their corresponding names in ). The collection TARI 135082 was previously identified as (Rahmanian et al. 2014), but was re-determined by RJS as . DNA was extracted from silica gel dried or herbarium leaf material as described in Gillespie et al. (2008). Three plastid markers (matK, rpoB-trnC and trnT-trnL-trnF [TLF]) and two nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) markers (internal transcribed spacer [ITS] and external transcribed spacer [ETS]) were sequenced. Amplification and sequencing protocols, including primers used, were described in our previous studies, as follows: ITS and TLF (Gillespie et al. 2008); ETS (Gillespie et al. 2009, 2010); matK and rpoB-trnC (Soreng et al. 2015b). Sequences were assembled, edited, aligned and concatenated using Geneious ver. 6.1.5 (http://www.geneious.com). The MAFFT ver. 7.017 plugin (Katoh and Standley 2013) was used for alignment, followed by manual PageBreakadjustment. All samples are complete for all markers, except for several samples with missing ends. The molecular study was conducted at the Canadian Museum of Nature; sequencing was mostly performed by NA, analyses by LJG. Maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were performed in PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) using the heuristic search command with default settings, including tree bisection-reconnection (TBR) swapping, saving all multiple shortest trees (Multrees) with a maximum number set to 100,000. Branch support was assessed using MP bootstrap analyses performed in PAUP* with heuristic search strategy, 10,000 bootstrap replicates, each with ten random addition sequence replicates, saving ten trees per replicate. Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo analyses were conducted in MrBayes (Ronquist et al. 2011). Optimal models of molecular evolution for individual markers were first determined using the Akaike information criterion (AIC; Akaike 1974) conducted through likelihood searches in jModeltest with default settings (Darriba et al. 2012). Models were set at GTR + Γ for ITS, ETS and rpoB-trnC partitions and GTR + I + Γ for matK and TLF partitions based on the AIC scores and the models allowed in MrBayes. Two independent runs of four chained searches were performed for either two or three million generations (analyses were stopped when split frequency of 0.005 was reached or closely approached), sampling every 500 generations, with default parameters. A 25% burn-in was implemented prior to summarising a 50% majority rule consensus tree and calculating Bayesian posterior probabilities (pp). MP heuristic searches and bootstrap analyses were performed initially on the separate marker alignments. Strict consensus trees were examined for conflicting topologies with incongruence identified by branch conflicts with ≥75% bootstrap support (BS). No supported incongruence was found between ITS and ETS trees, nor amongst the three plastid trees. Further MP and Bayesian analyses were performed on the separate concatenated nrDNA (77 samples, 1251 aligned characters) and plastid (77 samples, 4465 characters) alignments. Since supported incongruence was detected between the nrDNA and plastid strict consensus trees, species and clades determined to be incongruent were removed prior to performing analyses on the concatenated combined nrDNA and plastid alignment (68 samples, 5599 aligned characters). Trees were viewed in FigTree v1.4.0 (Rambaut 2006+). Clade designations follow Soreng et al. (2010) with modifications as in Cabi et al. (2017) and Soreng et al. (2017b), wherein well-supported major clades are assigned letters.

Results

Plastid and nrDNA Bayesian trees are given in Fig. 1 with summary statistics in Suppl. material 1. There are 100 new sequences reported in GenBank and these are given in Appendix 1. MP trees (bootstrap values shown below branches in Fig. 1) were very similar to the Bayesian trees with a few minor unsupported differences. Major clades (shown by letter and colour in Fig. 1) are identical in both nrDNA and plastid trees, PageBreakwith two exceptions: R. Br. and members ( Scribn., J. Presl and Trin.), each belonging to different major clades in the two trees. The position of three major clades differs significantly between the nrDNA and plastid trees: J clade (sect. : A. Kern.), S clade (sects. and ) and V clade (sect. : L.). major clades have been described elsewhere (Gillespie et al. 2007, 2008, 2009, Soreng et al. 2010, 2017b, Cabi et al. 2017); here we focus on the position of .
Figure 1.

nrDNA and plastid Baysian analyses showing placement of and . Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus trees of nrDNAITS and ETS (left) and plastid data (trnT-trnL-trnF, matK and rpoB-trnC) (right). Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches, MP bootstrap values below branches. Outgroups are not shown. Major clades are indicated by colour and capital letter. Taxa shown in black belong to different major clades in plastid and nrDNA trees.

nrDNA and plastid Baysian analyses showing placement of and . Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus trees of nrDNAITS and ETS (left) and plastid data (trnT-trnL-trnF, matK and rpoB-trnC) (right). Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches, MP bootstrap values below branches. Outgroups are not shown. Major clades are indicated by colour and capital letter. Taxa shown in black belong to different major clades in plastid and nrDNA trees. species, together with and , form a clade (E clade) in both nrDNA and plastid trees, but are strongly supported only in the plastid analysis (pp = 1, BS = 99%). All , , and accessions form a strongly supported clade (core clade) in both trees (pp = 1, BS = 100%). In the plastid analysis , and form a strongly supported clade (pp = 1, BS = 100%), with sister to (pp = 1, BS = 96%). In the nrDNA tree, and are sister taxa (pp = 0.99, BS = 77%) and is weakly supported as sister to this clade plus the core clade (pp = 0.97, BS = 59%). Within the core clade, all and samples form a strongly supported clade in the nrDNA analysis (pp = 1, BS = 100%), whereas in the plastid analysis, these samples are divided between two strongly supported clades corresponding to plus one sample (IRAN 20357, identification needs confirmation) (pp = 1, BS = 89%) and all remaining samples of (pp = 1, BS = 100%). and samples do not form a clade in either analysis, although all except one (, Soreng 9215) are strongly supported as a clade (pp = 1, BS = 95%) in the plastid tree. The combined nrDNA and plastid Bayesian tree with proportional branch lengths is shown in Fig. 2. Prior to analysis, species and clades with positions incongruent (branch conflicts with ≥ 75% BS) between the nrDNA and plastid trees were removed, including , , species and the J, S, and V clades. The E clade is strongly supported, as are its two subclades, - and the core clade (all pp = 1, BS = 100%). Both subclades are on long branches and separated by considerable genetic distance. The core clade is subdivided into two strongly supported clades: - (pp = 0.99, BS = 96%) and - (pp = 1, BS = 94%). and three of four accessions of each form moderately or strongly supported clades (pp = 1, BS = 86%; pp = 1, BS = 100%, respectively).
Figure 2.

combined nrDNA and plastid Baysian analysis showing placement of . Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree of combined nrDNA (ITS and ETS) and plastid data (trnT-trnL-trnF, matK and rpoB-trnC). Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches, MP bootstrap values below branches. Major clades are indicated by colour and capital letter; outgroups are shown in black.

combined nrDNA and plastid Baysian analysis showing placement of . Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree of combined nrDNA (ITS and ETS) and plastid data (trnT-trnL-trnF, matK and rpoB-trnC). Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches, MP bootstrap values below branches. Major clades are indicated by colour and capital letter; outgroups are shown in black. In the combined nrDNA and plastid tree (Fig. 2), the E clade is strongly supported as sister (pp = 1, BS = 100%) to a clade comprising supersects. (H clade) and (P clade) and the N clade ( plus unassigned species). In the nrDNA analysis, the E clade is strongly supported as sister to clades P+H (not differentiated), N, and X (represented here by ) (Fig. 1). In the plastid analysis, the E clade is sister to a larger clade comprising clades H, N, and P, plus J, S and V (Fig. 1).

Discussion

Our molecular analyses of plastid and nuclear ribosomal DNA strongly support the position of and within the genus and were united in a clade along with with strong support in the plastid and combined trees (weak support in the nuclear tree). We call this set the E clade PageBreak(Soreng et al. 2010, Cabi et al. 2017) and accept it as . In its recent usage, this subgenus was initially considered to include only (Zhu et al. 2006, Gillespie et al. 2007); here it is expanded to include and . Within the E clade, three taxa of southwest Turkey and Cyprus, , and , are phylogenetically isolated from all the other species of sampled (the core clade). All three taxa formed a strongly supported clade in the plastid tree, while in the nuclear tree only the first two species form a clade and is sister to this clade plus the core clade. The position of is moderately supported as incongruent between the nuclear and plastid trees suggesting that the genus may be of hybrid origin; however, further studies are needed to confirm incongruence over lack of support. All taxa sampled, excluding , form a strongly supported clade in all trees, called here the core clade. This clade includes two strongly supported subclades in the combined nuclear-plastid tree, corresponding to s.l. and s.l. In the first subclade, is nested amongst samples, as is the sample originally determined as (TARI 35082). The sample (Soreng 9240) comes from the type locality of in SW Turkey and is a good match for that species, but we believe that should be treated as a synonym of . The s.l. subclade in the combined tree includes a strongly supported and divergent clade of three samples and a clade of plus one sample of (identification needs confirmation). The position of (tetraploid) with (diploid and hexaploid) is strongly supported in the combined and nuclear trees, but is weakly supported with (diploid) in the plastid tree. This, together with ploidy level, is suggestive of a possible hybrid origin for , but this hypothesis needs to be further explored. As noted in the introduction and Table 1, there has been no consensus on the taxonomy of species. Bor (1970, p. 49) wrote “As far as the genus Roshev. is concerned I am prepared to accept two species only: (Trin.) Roshev. and (Regel) Roshev.” He considered , and “only worthy of varietal rank” as the single taxon, . Tzvelev (1976), Cope (1982) and Mill (1985) dismissed the form as indistinct, yet it was maintained as a species by Bor (1970) and Rahmanian et al. (2014). As such, the array of taxa has been treated as a series of species, subspecies or varieties. The taxonomy proposed by Tzvelev (1976) seems the most useful for treating s.l. and s.l.; each is treated as a separate species with subspecies. His classification, supported by molecular data, is adopted here with some minor modifications. Here, we present a synopsis of based on our current understanding. Further herbarium and molecular study is needed before a more comprehensive revision of the subgenus can be produced. We treat all species, and in . We merge all taxa and into and treat the taxa as five species. Trin. is the correct name for within Two subspecies, subsp. and (Boiss.) Soreng & G.H. Zhu, are recognised in based in part on their mostly clear separation in the plastid analyses and morphological distinctions. Subspecies includes three difficult to distinguish varieties: var. (formerly PageBreak), var. and var. (formerly ). includes two subspecies and is clearly separated from both subspecies in the analyses. Most taxa already have names in or the epithets used in are available in (with one exception).

Taxonomy

(K. Koch) Stapf in J. D. Hooker, Fl. Brit. India 7(22): 337. 1897 [1896]. [unranked] Bor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 62: 467, 1968 (nom. illeg. hom., non Kindb., 1897).

Emended diagnosis.

Like species of other subgenera, but annual ( a weak stooling perennial) and differing from other annual species of by combination of sheath margins fused only near the base (basal sheaths fused to 16%, top sheath 4–12% [to 50% in ]), panicle branches scabrous along angles ( smooth), arranged in whorl-like groups of 5 to 27 per node (sometimes fewer in and ), sometimes the lower whorls of branches naked or with only a few sterile spikelets, flowers bisexual, glumes short (lower glume 2/7–2/3 (–3/4) the first lemma in length), 1-veined (3-veined in ), apex sharply pointed, sometimes apiculate, rachilla internodes exposed, scaberulous, callus glabrous (or with a short crown of hairs in ), lemmas membranous to subchartaceous ( chartaceous), 3–5 veined, the intermediate veins faint when present, laterally compressed, but the keel not pronounced, glabrous or keel and marginal veins short sericeous (also sericeous between the veins in ), but keel scabrous distal to the hairs.

Distribution.

Southwest Asia from Israel, Lebanon, Cyprus and Turkey eastwards through Transcaucasia, Iran, central Asia to western China and northwest India. Sporadic elsewhere, possibly adventive on Egypt’s North African coast but native east of the Red Sea, adventive in Europe and Canada.

Notes.

A subgenus of seven species with several infraspecies, distributed mainly in semi-arid midlands to uplands (usually 300 m plus) to alpine, with winter spring / summer drought precipitation pattern, often along trails and roads, cultivated fields and pastures, around puddles, shallow springs, swales and vernal pools, snow beds, in pine/oak forests to open grasslands and deserts, also in shallow caves, in shallow sandy or stony soils or screes of igneous or metamorphic rocks of igneous or sedimentary origin, including pumice, lava, serpentine, shale, sandstone, limestone and marble.

Key to taxa and other annual species of in the coincident geographic region

Plants annual (infrequently perennial or perenniating); anthers mostly 0.2–1 mm (to 1.7 mm in the weak stemmed, stooling perennial , to 2.8 mm in the annual species ). (K. Koch) Hack., Nat. Pflanzenfam. 2(2): 73. 1887.

Emended description.

Tufted annuals. Leaf sheaths keeled, margins fused for 4–12% their length; blades flat to convolute, surfaces scabrous. Panicles open, with (1–)3–27 branches at lower nodes, lower whorls sometimes sterile; branches ascending to widely spreading, scabrous angled, with pedicels mostly equalling or up to 4× longer than their spikelets. Spikelets 1–10-flowered; glumes unequal, 1st glume 1-veined, 2nd glume 3-veined, usually reaching to less than ⅔ the adjacent lemma; rachilla internodes terete, scabrous; callus smooth, glabrous, with a round disarticulation scar; lemmas laterally compressed, weakly keeled, glabrous or short sericeous in lower half of the keel and also along the marginal veins, between veins smooth or scabrous, glabrous (rarely sericeous), 5-veined, intermediate veins obscure to distinct, margins narrowly to broadly scarious, apex obtuse to acuminate, sometimes briefly muticus. Flowers perfect, ovaries glabrous, anthers 0.2–2.8 mm long; caryopsis 1.5–2.5 mm long, narrowly elliptical, laterally compressed, fused to the palea, solid, hilum ⅛–⅙ the grain in length. (H. Scholz) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespie comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77191831-1 H. Scholz, Willdenowia 10(1): 33, f. 1. 1980.

Type.

Turkey. Antalya, “nordwestl. Antalya bei Termessos, ausgetrockneter Gebirgsbach”, 300 m, 23 Jul 1979, Kehl s.n. (holotype: B! [B-100272775]) Turkey (western Taurus Mts.). We provisionally retain this species in sect. , despite its divergent phylogenetic placement. The species is morphologically similar to other members of the section. As noted by Mill (1985), it is most like Roshev., but the anthers are smaller. Some populations of approach and are problematical to separate (see under ). Further molecular study is needed to determine if the three species are closely related and if a new section is warranted. Trin., Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersbourg, Sér. 6, Sci. Math., Seconde Pt. Sci. Nat. 4,2(1): 69–70. 1836. Trin., Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersbourg Divers Savans 2: 526. 1835. “Sterilissimus salsuginosis deserti editi Tschujae”, [1800–3000 m], July 1832, A. Bunge (lectotype, designated by Tzvelev 1976, pg. 480, and marked in herbarium: LE! [Trinius herbarium microform image 424-A4! p.p. Bunge 1832]; isolectotypes: LE [3 specimens: TRIN-2620.01! with original description (Trinius herbarium microform 312-A1), Trinius herbarium microform images 424-A3!, 424-A5!], K [K000789849 image!; specimen labelled “ Trin. Altai”, “Acad. St. Petrop, mis. 8br 1835” is a good match for LE type material]). See Soreng et al. (1995) for explanation of Trinius herbarium citations. Egypt (Sinai Peninsula) to China (Xinjiang, Xizang). Separating the four forms of s.l. treated here is often difficult. Here we choose to recognise two subspecies as divided in the molecular plastid analysis. Subspecies and are most easily separated by the minute anthers (0.2–0.6 mm) combined with glabrous or nearly glabrous lemmas in the former and slightly longer anthers (0.6–1.1 mm) combined with hairy lemma keels and marginal veins in the latter. The other forms, s.s., and are essentially intergrading and are here treated as varieties in subsp. . The specimen K000789848 (image!) (“Al. Bunge” ex hrbr. Alexandri Lehmann, Reliquiae botanicae, original det “ Tr.”) might be original material of , but RJS doubts it as it is not a good match for LE types; it is a taller plant more like K00789847 (also Reliquiae ), which is Bunge material collected 20 May 1842, in Karakum desert. Fig. 3A
Figure 3.

. A, Chu, Kyrgyz Republic (Soreng et al. 7537) B, C, Adiyaman, Turkey (Soreng et al. 9215) B habit C closeup of base of plant showing keeled leaf sheaths and caniculate blades D, E, Mardin, Turkey (Soreng et al. 9240) D habit E spikelet showing glabrous lemmas. Photos by R.J. Soreng.

(Trin.) Asch. & Graebn., Syn. Mitteleur. Fl. 2: 437. 1900. China (Xinjiang, Xizang), Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Russia (Altai Mts.), Tajikistan, Turkey. A single specimen recorded from Turkey (Kars Prov., Litvinov 4790 US ex K) evidently belongs to this variety and was also cited by Mill (1985) under . . A, Chu, Kyrgyz Republic (Soreng et al. 7537) B, C, Adiyaman, Turkey (Soreng et al. 9215) B habit C closeup of base of plant showing keeled leaf sheaths and caniculate blades D, E, Mardin, Turkey (Soreng et al. 9240) D habit E spikelet showing glabrous lemmas. Photos by R.J. Soreng. (Boiss.) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespie comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77191833-1 Boiss., Fl. Orient. 5: 610. 1884. Turkey. Lyciae, ad fonts reginis alpinae montis Elmalu, 25 Jun 1860, E. Bourgeau 271 (lectotype, here designated: G [G00330280 image!]; isolectotypes: G [G00380172 image!, p.p. central and right top two samples], G [G0038173 image!], K [K-000789856 image!]). Armenia, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, Georgia, Iran, Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Turkey and Turkmenistan(?). This taxon, accepted as by several authors (see Names of Uncertain Application below), was first recognised infraspecifically by Boissier (1884) as . The variety is common in the highest elevations at which the genus occurs, in the alpine of Turkey, Iran and Afghanistan to the Pamir mountains, reaching 4000 m. Further study is needed to clarify the distinction of var. from var. and these from , as the material placed here appears heterogenous. Of the six syntypes of var. cited by Boissier (Bourgeau 271, hab. in alpinis, montes supra Elmali Lyciae [G00380172, G0038173, G00330280, K000789856]; Kotschy 12, Tarus Cilicicus, 5–6000’; Prairies humides de la region alpine du Taurus, au Boulgarmden [as 12d: G00330281, K000789851 image!]; Balansa s.n., Jul-Aug 1855 [K000789857, P02358251 p.p. bottom right]; Blanche s.n., Libani cacuminal; Kotschy 477, mons Kuh Delu Persiae australis, 10 Jun 1842 [BM000959359 image!, E!, G00308632 image!, P02358251! p.p. “fo. pygmaea” bottom left]), we select Bourgeau 271 as the lectotype as it is typical of the form. As noted by Samuelsson (1950), the Sintenis syntype (mons Troodos, Cypri) represents a separate form that is treated here as . var. “minor” Boiss. (cited by Mill, in Fl. Turkey 9: 492. 1985) is a nomen nudum since it is a herbarium name on Bourgeau 271, syntype of var. Boiss.; this name is also inscribed on Kotschy 12d (p.p. G00308174), but the latter is original material, not a syntype, mentioned by Boissier (1884). (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespie comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77191834-1 Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey., Enum. Pl. Nov. 1: 1–2. 1841. Kar. & Kir., Bull. Soc. Imp. Naturalistes Moscou 864. 1841, nom. illeg. hom. Ad fl. Karatal versus montes Karatau, 13 June 1840, H. Schrenk s.n. (holotype: LE; isotype: LE). Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, China (Xizang), Georgia, Iran, Israel, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. was recently recorded (as ; determination verified here) from one locality in northernmost Israel (Danin and Fragman-Sapir 2016+). It was collected as a waif in Canada (Manitoba) in the 1950s (Stevenson 1965, as ; Darbyshire 2007, as : re-identified here), but is apparently not persistent (Darbyshire 2007, B.A. Ford, pers. comm, 2018). Tzvelev (1976, pg. 480) cited “In herbidis Songaria ad rivulum Tschulak [Jun 1841], Karelin & Kiriloff 2123” (LE!) as type of (duplicates at BM000959360 image!, K000789846 image!, BR0000006600860 image!, P02663388!, P02663405!), but the type is the one [1840] collection cited by Karelin and Kiriloff (1841) distributed as Herb. Fischer no. 504. (Boiss.) Soreng & G.H. Zhu, Fl. China 22: 266. 2006. Boiss., Fl. Orient. 5: 610. 1884. Turkey. In collibus prope Baibout, 17 Jul 1963, E. Bourgeau (lectotype, designated by Tzvelev 1976, pg. 479: LE! [LE00009676]; isolectotypes: LE [LE00009678 image!], P [P02358146! pp a, P03142400!]). Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, China (Xizang), Kyrgyz Republic, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan. Most accounts have recognised this taxon at one rank or another, except Mill (1985) who treated it as a synonym of . Several collections were cited in the original protologue: , Hab. in Ponto; Balansa, Ponto Lazico ad Djimil [Balansa 1549 G00308631, E, LE!, P02014318 (= subsp. ), P02014317 (= ), US!]; Huet, Erzurum [G00330279, G00308633]; E. Bourgeau, Armenia, in collibus et agris in cultis Armeniae Turcicae ad Gumuchkhane. Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespie nom. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477374-2 R.R. Mill, Fl. Turkey & E. Aegean Isl. 9: 624, 490. 1985 (non Turkey. Adana, distr. Feke, Sencan Dere nr Gurumze, 1300 m, 30 May 1952, P.H. Davis, Dodds & Cetic 19681 (holotype: E! [E00196495]; isotypes: BM! [BM000959355], K! [K000789852]). Turkey (central and eastern Taurus Mts. and adjacent ranges). Morphologically is intermediate between and . However, we are not sure which of these it is actually related to or if it is a hybrid between them. The type approaches in having anthers 1.2–1.3 mm long and in having abundant branching and sometimes having some sterile branches amongst the lower branch whorls. Much of the material of from further west than the type location from the Taurus Mts. has smaller anthers and is problematical to separate from . (Roshev.) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespie comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477375-2 Roshev., in Köie, M., Beitr. Fl. Sudwest Iran I. Danish Sci. Invest. Iran In K. Jessen & R. Sparck. (Eds) Danish Sci. Invest. Iran, pt. 4: 50. 1945. Iran. 60 km north of Dizful, 3 May 1937, M. Köie 475 (lectotype, here designated: C [C10016935 image!]; isolectotype: LE). Iran (Zagros Mts.). Due to its sterile whorls of branches, this species seems very close to and , but may be a derivative of since it has longer anthers than the previous taxa. Roshevits cited two gatherings of Köie: “Kechwar, 700 m (3 May 1937; no. 475). Chah-Bazan, 500 m” (Kechvar is about 60 km north of Dizful). The specimen at C has the same date and collection number as Roshevits cited and was annotated by Roshevits as this taxon; we select it as the lectotype. The anthers are ca. 1.1–1.2 mm as measured from the C photo and other characters seem to match . The anther length is given as 1.5 mm in Roshevits’ diagnosis. The specimen clearly has the hyaline lemma apices of s.l. (in contrast to ). However, these features are also present in the type of (=). has shorter anthers, ca. 0.8 to 1 mm, on the type (anthers not described by Scholz 1980 or Mill 1985). and may represent the same species, diagnosed as different from by sterile branches and from Boiss. by glabrous lemmas ( has pubescent lemmas). However, and are geographically isolated by over 1500 km and have different anther lengths. Trin., Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci. St.-Pétersbourg, Sér. 6, Sci. Math. 1(4): 373. 1830. (Trin.) K. Koch, Linnaea 21(1[4]): 410. 1848. Iran: in collibus ad Akar-Tschai prob. Karabagh, 1400–1900 m, 27 May 1829, Szowits 246 (lectotype, designated by Tzvelev 1976, pg. 479: LE! [photo E000327964!, TRIN-microform 434-B4!]; isolectotypes: LE [TRIN-2666.02!, TRIN-microform 434A8!, 434-B1!, 434-B2!, 434-B3!]). Other original material includes: Iran, Prov. Aderbeidschan. distr. Khoi, ad Seidchadzi, 18 May 1828, Szovits 258 (LE!, LE0009678 [image!], LE0009679, LE0009680 [image!], LE0009681 [image!], W0028250 [image!]; In apricis prov. Aderbeidschan e Karabahg, Fischer [herb. Fischer] (K000789867 [image!]). has two major variations: subsp. with pubescent lemmas and relatively narrower panicle length to plant height ratio; and subsp. with glabrous lemmas and relatively greater panicle length to plant height ratio, and often more flowers per spikelet. Fig. 3B, C Grossh., Trudy. Bot. Inst. Azerbaidzh. Fil. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. 8: 268. 1939, nom. inval. Hance, Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot., sér. 4, 18: 234. 1862. Type protologue. In Tauro cilicio, Steud., Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1: 286. 1854 (non Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Egypt (north coast, possibly adventive), Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Syria, Turkey; waif in France (introduced in wool, Marseille, H. Roux, P06768417!, P03370109!; RJS determination, 2015) and Norway (Greuter et al. 1984+). Although Kotschy’s herbarium is mainly at W, a search of the W herbarium website did not turn up Kotschy 529 except as the genus from Tauro cilicio or a from Persia. Kotschy 528 at W is a of the complex from “In monte Tauro” in 1836. Presumably the earlier 1836 set was broken up and 529 ended up at BM and P. The anthers in the lectotype are 1.8 mm long and the lemmas are pubescent along the keel and marginal veins. (Trautv.) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespie comb. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477377-2 Fig. 3D, E Trautv., Trudy Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 4: 406. 1876. Boiss. & Blanche, Diagn. Pl. Orient., ser. 2, 4: 133–134. 1859. Post, Bull. Herb. Boissier 5: 760–761. 1897. Type protologue. Habitat in collibus prope Midyat (Mardin), R.R. Mill, Fl. Turkey & E. Aegean Isl. 9: 624, 488. 1985.Type. Turkey. Mardin, Mardin to Nusaybin, 8 km from Mardin, 850 m alt., shallow limestone gully, 22 May 1957, Armenia rossica, prope monasterium Kiptschach, 1875, G. Raddi. Type: Armenia rossica: prope monasterium Kiptschach in monte Alagos, Jun 1875, G. Radde 124 (holotype: LE! [photo E00326521!]; isotypes: LE, LE, W [W19160014191 image!]). Armenia, Georgia, Iran, Lebanon, Pakistan, Syria and Turkey. The presence of hairs on the lemmas in material treated as “multiradiat” is confused in the literature. Mill (1985) indicates that and s.s. have lemma keels hairy in the lower ⅓–½. We concur with Tzvelev (1976), who keyed as lemmas short pilose along the base of keel and marginal veins and subsp. as lemmas glabrous or with a few solitary hairs. Mill (1985) distinguished his new species from based on its glabrous lemmas, 8–12-flowered spikelets and florets strongly divergent from the rachilla. However, subsp. also has glabrous lemmas (as noted above) and divergent florets (when spikelets are in flower) and its (4)5–9(10)-flowered spikelets overlap in number; therefore, we treat as a synonym of . The type material of is from the same place as and is clearly the same form (spikelets many-flowered); , with ca. 12–14-flowered spikelets, also appears to belong to this form. If were accepted as a species, the basionym names or would have priority. Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespie sect. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477378-2 J.R. Edm.

Diagnosis.

Differing from in being perennial and stooling, with top culm sheath margins fused 40–50% their length and from almost all in proximal spikelets being 1-flowered. J.R. Edm., Fl. Turkey & E. Aegean Isl. 9: 623. 473. 1985. Turkey. C4, Konya, distr. Ermenek, Kamis Dere between Ermenek and Oyuklu Dag., floor of caverns, 1400–1500 m, 14 Aug 1949, P. H. Davis 16180 (holotype: K! [K000641325]; isotype: E! [E00367874]). Turkey (central Taurus Mts.). was described by Edmondson (1985) as an annual species of Asch. & Graebn (≡ Stapf. Type: ). Our investigation found it to be a feeble, stooling perennial with sparsely scabrous panicle branches, uppermost sheaths closed up to half their length, spikelets sparsely scaberulous, mostly 1-flowered, the distal-most ones frequently 2(–3) flowered, anthers 1.1–1.7 mm, caryopsis 1.7–1.8 mm long, hilum 0.3 mm long and grain adherent to the palea. DNA data have clearly placed it in the clade that includes species (E clade), either as sister to (nuclear data) or as sister to + (plastid data). The species is odd in subgenus for its perennial habit (albeit weak) and more closed sheaths, and in generally by its mostly uniflorous spikelets. It is a very rare species that lives in the backs of shallow, moist, cool caves in the Taurus Mts., along with other cave endemics. (Bor) Soreng, Cabi & L.J. Gillespie sect. nov. urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:60477379-2 Bor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 62: 467, 1968 (nom. illeg. hom., non Kindb., 1897). Bor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 63: 368. 1969. H. Lindb. ≡ (H. Lindb.) Bor. Differing from in: panicle branches smooth; lower glume 3-veined, up to 3/4 as long as the lower lemma; lemmas 3-veined, relatively firm, sericeous on keel marginal veins and sides; callus with short crown of hairs, the hairs 0.2 mm long; and palea keels sericeous in part. H. Lindb., Årsbok-Vuosik. Soc. Sci. Fenn. 20 B (7): 5. 1942 (emend. Lindberg 1946). (H. Lindb.) Bor, Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 62: 467. 1968. Sam., Ark. Bot., n.s. 1(9): 417. 1950 [1951].Type. Cyprus. auf dem Troodos, 20 Jun 1880,

Type protologue.

Cyprus. In pineto () in m. Troodos lecta est. 1939. Type. Cyprus. Troodos in pineto juxta via huad procul ab “Olympus Camp Hotel”, 22 Jun 1939, H. Lindberg s.n. (holotype: S [S-11-34137 image!]; isotypes: S [S-G-4941 image!], K [K000789839 image!], LD [LD1807330 image!], W [image!]). Cyprus (Mt. Troodos, endemic to serpentine rocks). Regel, Trudy Imp. S.-Peterburgsk. Bot. Sada 7: 594. 1881. Eremopoa bellula (Regel) Roshev., Fl. URSS 2: 431, pl. 32, f. 12. 1934. Ad fontes calidos Araschan Bulak in Turkestania occidentali, Krause s.n. Type: Taschkenter Alatau, Araschan Bulak, 11 Jun 1871, () Krause s.n. (holotype: LE [only one collection cited]). was applied by several authors to small densely tufted alpine annual plants of south-central and southwest Asia, which we recognise as (based on Boissier [1884]). Tzvelev (1976, pg. 480) noted that the holotype collection of appeared to be a mix of () and forms (“p.p. max” = , somewhat intermediate between this subsp. and subsp. , and “p.p. minor” = ); he considered to be a synonym of subsp. . Further study is needed to clarifiy the placement of and determine if it is synonymous with . Gamajun., Bot. Mater. Gerb. Inst. Bot. Akad. Nauk Kazahsk. SSR 2: 2. 1964. Usbekistanica, Tian Schan Occid., Bostandyk, fonts Aksar-sai, 28 Jul 1949, N. V. Pavlov s.n. (holotype: AA). Tzvelev (1976, pg. 480) included as a synonym under , but noted that it is somewhat intermediate between this taxon and . As the protologue indicates the plants are 10–28 cm tall, with 3 to 4 florests per spikelet, spikelets 4–7 mm long and anthers 2.5 mm long, this is more likely to be , perhaps subsp. , since no pubescence is indicated. K. Koch, Linnaea 21(3): 410. 1848. Poa heptantha (K. Koch) Steud., Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1: 255. 1854. Im Hochgebirge, auf sumpfigen Wiesen, auf Urgestein, 5500 ft, C. Koch s.n. (holotype: B, probably destroyed).

Note.

There is no location in the species protologue beyond the article title “Beitrage zu einer Flora des Orients”. Tzvelev (1976) indicated this name and the next, , probably apply to and that the types of these were in Berlin (B). Clayton et al. 2002+ (GrassBase) reflect the same information. RJS was unable to locate type material of either of these two names at B, P or via internet searches. K. Koch, Linnaea 21: 409. 1848. Poa polygama (K. Koch) Steud., Syn. Pl. Glumac. 1: 255. 1854. “Aus dem Wilhelm’schen Herbr als .” Type: (holotype: B, probably destroyed). Tzvelev (1976) indicates “Caucasus?”, but there is no location in the species protologue beyond the article title “Beitrage zu einer Flora des Orients”. H. Scholz, Willdenowia 11(1): 96. 1981. Persia, Prov. Azerbaijan occid.: In pratis paludosis SE Shahpur versus lacum Rezaiyeh (Urmia), 1300 m; 12 Jun 1971, Rechinger 41820 (holotype: W [W1972-0000975 image!; isotypes: B! [B 10_0272774], GZU [GZU000201751 image!], WU [WU0033125 image!]). The type collection of is clearly a perennial species of (possibly (Grossh.) Grossh.) with lemmas rounded on the back, a distinct short crown of callus hairs and papillae common on vegetative structures (pedicels and leaves). Material cited as in Rahmanian et al. (2014, fig. 5) appears to us to be ; their description and illustration indicate an annual habit, pubescent lemmas and panicles with 10 or more branches per whorl. The single specimen (TARI 35082) cited was included in our molecular analysis and formed a clade with other accessions in all trees.

Invalid names, not vouchered

Notes. Kew GrassBase (Clayton et al. 2002+) indicates it is equal to . The specimen K00078950 (ex P) (image!), Voyage V. Jacquemont aux Indes orient. no. 1902, has this name on the label. The specimen is certainly , not .
1Palea keels soft hairy, never scabrous; callus glabrous (Poasect.Micrantherae) 2
Palea keels scabrous at least in part (if hairy in part, then distally scabrous); callus glabrous or hairy 3
2Anthers 0.2–0.5 mm long; panicle branches ascending, spikelets congested along the branches; plants light green Poainfirma Kunth
Anthers 0.5–1 mm long; panicle branches spreading to ascending, spikelets moderately congested along the branches; plants darker green Poaannua L.
3Spikelets ovate; lemma keels densely villous medially, many hairs over 0.5 mm long; callus with a plicate web; anthers 0.4–0.8 mm long; panicles short (to 5 cm long), branches terete, smooth or sparsely scabrid, with 1–2 branches per node; upper culm sheath margins fused 25–35(–50)% their length; plants of vernal swales, Albania, Croatia, Greece, Bulgaria and European part of Turkey (Poasect.Jubatae) Poa jubata
Spikelets generally lanceolate; lemma keels glabrous or sericeous, hairs less than 0.3(–0.5) mm long; callus glabrous or with a short crown of hairs; anthers 0.2–2.8 mm long; panicles short or long, branches angled, smooth or scabrous, mostly with 2 to 27 branches per node, commonly appearing whorled; upper culm sheath margins fused 4–12% their length (40–50% in P.speluncarum); plants of Cyprus, Anatolian Turkey, southwards and eastwards across Asia into China (Poasubg.Pseudopoa, incl. Eremopoa) 4
4Uppermost culm sheath margins fused 40–50% their length; spikelets mostly 1-flowered; lemmas glabrous; callus glabrous; anthers 1.1–1.7 long; plants feeble, stooling perennials of caves and shady cool moist places in the Taurus Mts. of Turkey (rare) (Poasect.Speluncarae) Poa speluncarum
Uppermost culm sheath margins fused 4–12% their length; spikelets (1–)2 to 10-flowered; lemmas glabrous or pubescent; callus glabrous or with a minute crown of hairs; anthers 0.2–2.8 mm long; plants slender tufted annuals 5
5Lemmas 3-veined, apex slightly apiculate, lemmas and paleas subcoriaceous, sericeous along the keel(s) and marginal veins and between the veins; panicle branches smooth, mostly 1–5 at lower nodes; callus glabrous or with a short crown of hairs; plants endemic to Cyprus (usually on serpentine substrates) (Poasect.Lindbergella) Poa sintenisii
Lemmas 5-veined (veins commonly faint), apex infrequently apiculate, lemmas and paleas subchartaceous to subcoriaceous, glabrous between the veins or throughout; panicle branches scabrous, (1–)5–27 at lower nodes; callus glabrous; plants widespread, but not in Cyprus (Poasect.Pseudopoa) 6
6Panicles with 1 to 3 lower whorls of 7 or more sterile/naked or mostly sterile branches; panicles 7–20 cm long, effusely branched; lemmas 2–2.5 mm long, sericeous along the keel and marginal veins; spikelets 1–4(–6)-flowered 7
Panicles not or infrequently with some sterile lower branches; panicles 2–21 cm long, effusely to sparsely branched; lemmas 1.8–4.5 mm long, glabrous or sericeous along the keel and marginal veins; spikelets 1–12-flowered 8
7Anthers 1.1–1.5 mm long; ligules 1.5–2.5 mm long; branches 7–20 per lower whorl; spikelets 1–4(–6)-flowered; plants of Zagros Mts., Iran P. nephelochloides
Anthers 0.8–1 mm long; ligules 1–1.5 mm long; branches 7–15 per lower whorl; spikelets 1–3-flowered; plants of Taurus Mts., Turkey P. attalica
8Anthers (1.2–)1.4–2.8 mm long; lemma apex blunt or obtuse to acutely pointed, with a broad membranous margin (P.persica s.l.) 9
Anthers 0.2–1.3 mm long; lemma apex acute or narrowly acute to acuminately pointed, with a narrow membranous margin (blunt or slightly pointed in P.millii but then with 13–27 branches at lower panicle nodes) 10
9Lemmas all glabrous or rarely with a few hairs near the base of the keel or marginal veins; spikelets (4–)5–10(–12)-flowered; panicles usually ¼–½ the plant height; anthers 1.5–2.8 mm long P. persica subsp. multiradiata
Lemmas (at least of the lowest flower in a spikelet) minutely sericeous along the keel and marginal veins for ¼–⅔ the length; spikelets (2–)3–7(–9)-flowered; panicles usually ⅖–⅔ the plant height; anthers (1.2–)1.4–1.8 mm long P. persica subsp. persica
10Anthers mostly 0.2–0.6 mm long; lemmas 1.8–4.5 mm long, apex sharply pointed, usually glabrous, infrequently sparsely puberulent along the keel with one or a few soft hairs scattered near the base; spikelets (1–)2–3(–5)-flowered; plants 2–40 cm tall 11
Anthers 0.6–1.3 mm long; lemmas 2.3–3 mm long, apex acute and sharply pointed to obtuse and blunt, at least the lowest lemma in a spikelet evenly sericeous (hairs ca. 0.1–0.3(–3.5) mm long, stiff, appressed) along the keel in the proximal ¼–½ and along the marginal veins near the base; spikelets 3–5(–9)-flowered; plants mostly 15–60 cm tall 13
11Lemmas 3.5–4.5 mm long; panicles (2–)3–8(–9) cm long, branches 1–5(–7) at lower nodes, divaricately rebranched and relatively stout, spikelets usually sparse and few; plants mostly 5–25(–30) cm tall P. diaphora subsp. diaphora var. diaphora
Lemmas 1.8–3.5(–3.8 in large specimens with many spikelets) mm long; panicles 2–15(–20) cm long, branches (1–)3–8(–12) at lower nodes, divaricately rebranched or not, capillary to somewhat stout, spikelets sparse to crowded, few to many; plants 2–40 cm tall 12
12Plants low growing, with dense fascicles of rebranching culms; culms 2–6 cm tall, with lateral inflorescences from lower culm leaves; panicles contracted to open, 1.5–4 cm long, included in tuft of basal leaves or slightly exerted; lemmas 3–3.5 mm long; plants alpine P. diaphora subsp. diaphora var. alpina
Plants low growing or taller, without fascicles of rebranching culms; culms solitary to several, mostly 10–40 cm tall, without lateral inflorescences; panicles effuse, usually more than 5 cm long, usually exerted; lemmas 1.8–3.5 mm long; plants of various habitats P. diaphora subsp. diaphora var. songarica
13Spikelet pedicels mostly 2–5 mm long; panicle branches 5–18 at lower nodes, stiffly spreading, lower whorls never naked or with rudimentary spikelets; lemma apices acutely pointed; anthers 0.6–1.0(1.1) mm long P. diaphora subsp. oxyglumis
Spikelet pedicels mostly 5–10 mm long: panicle branches (9–)13–27 at lower nodes, slender, slightly flexuous, lower whorls sometimes with a few branches that are naked or with some rudimentary spikelets in addition to normal spikelets; lemma apices obtuse to acute, blunt or slightly pointed; anthers 0.8–1.3 mm long P. millii
Table A1.

, , and outgroup samples used in the phylogenetic analyses. Ingroup samples are arranged by plastid clade (pl), nuclear clade (nr) and section. Voucher information (herbarium indicated in parentheses) and country of origin are provided; where there is no collector or collector number, the herbarium specimen number is given. GenBank Accession numbers are provided for , ETS, trnT-trnL-trnF, matK and rpoB-trnC sequences for each sample; those in BOLD are new to this study.

plnrSectionTaxonVoucherCountry ITS ETS TLFmatKrpoB-trnC
AA Alpinae Poaalpina L.Gillespie 6299 (CAN)USA, ColoradoGQ324483GQ324287DQ353985.2KM523888KM524001
AA Alpinae Poabadensis Haenke ex Willd.Hajkova et al. 2004-12 (US)BulgariaGQ324490GQ324295GQ324402KY378861KY378827
AA Alpinae Poaligulata Boiss.(JACA 166095)SpainGQ324522GQ324346GQ324432.2KY378876KY378842
AA Alpinae Poathessala Boiss. & Orph.Gillespie et al. 10400 (CAN)TurkeyKM523802KM523729KM524088KM523901KM524014
AA Arenariae Poabactrianasubsp.glabriflora (Roshev.) TzvelevGauba (IRAN 21237)IranKX118734KX118716KX118751 MH921344 MH921369
AA Arenariae Poabulbosa L.Catalan 13-2000 (UZ)SpainEU792388GQ324297.2AH015557.3KY378863KY378829
AA Arenariae Poabulbosasubsp.vivipara (Koeler) Arcang.Soreng & Soreng 5814 (US)USA, Nevada (introd.)GQ324492GQ324298GQ324404 MH921345 MH921370
AA Arenariae Poa sinaica Steud. subsp. sinaica Soreng & Cabi 9249 (US)TurkeyKX118748KX118731KX118766KY378886KY378852
AA Arenariae Poatimoleontis Heldr. ex Boiss.Soreng et al. 7509-1 (US)GreeceKX118750KX118732KX118768 MH921354 MH921379
EE Lindbergella Lindbergellasintenisii (H. Lindb.) BorHand 6102 (US)Cyprus MH921326 MH921310 MH921393 MH921342 MK060117
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoaattalica H. ScholzGillespie et al. 10612 (CAN)Turkey MH921313 MH921297 MH921380 MH921329 MH921355
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoamultiradiata (Trautv.) Roshev.Soreng & Cabi 9240 (US)Turkey MH921314 MH921298 MH921381 MH921330 MH921356
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoaoxyglumis (Boiss.) Roshev.Gillespie & Levin 10313 (CAN)Turkey MH921316 MH921300 MH921383 MH921332 MH921358
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa oxyglumis Gillespie et al. 10578 (CAN)Turkey MH921317 MH921301 MH921384 MH921333 MH921359
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa oxyglumis Gillespie et al. 10584 (CAN)Turkey MH921318 MH921302 MH921385 MH921334 MH921360
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa oxyglumis Soreng & Cabi 8855 (US)Turkey MH921315 MH921299 MH921382 MH921331 MH921357
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoapersica (Trin.) Roshev.Assadi & Vosoughi (TARI 24939)Iran MH921321 MH921305 MH921388 MH921337 MH921363
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa persica Mozaffarian (TARI 53671)Iran MH921320 MH921304 MH921387 MH921336 MH921362
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa persica Soreng & Cabi 9215 (US)TurkeyKY378812KY378823KY378816KY378879KY378845
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa persica Yazdanfard (IRAN 51968)Iran MH921319 MH921303 MH921386 MH921335 MH921361
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa persica Mozaffarian & Nowrozi (TARI 35082)Iran MH921322 MH921306 MH921389 MH921338 MH921364
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoasongarica (Schrenk ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Roshev.Assadi & Mozaffarian (TARI 36867)Iran MH921324 MH921308 MH921391 MH921340 MH921366
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa songarica Iranshahr (IRAN 20357)Iran MH921323 MH921307 MH921390 MH921339 MH921365
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa songarica Soreng & Güney 4165 (US)TurkeyEU792400GQ324311DQ353988.2KY378868KY378834
EE Pseudopoa Eremopoa songarica Soreng & Cabi 9320 (US)Turkey MH921325 MH921309 MH921392 MH921341 MH921367
EE Speluncarae Poaspeluncarum J.R. Edm.Soreng et al. 8202 (US)Turkey MH921328 MH921312 MH921395 MH921353 MH921378
HP+HunclassifiedPoapseudobulbosa BorSoreng et al. 8246 (US)TurkeyKX118747KX118729KX118765 MH921352 MH921377
HP+H Acutifoliae Poaplanifolia KuntzePeterson et al. 19233 (US)ArgentinaKM523800KM523727KM524087KM523896KM524009
HP+H Brizoides Poapoiformis (Labill.) DruceGillespie et al. 7381 (CAN)AustraliaGQ324534GQ324361GQ324445KM523897KM524010
HP+H Homalopoa s.l. Poareflexa Vasey & Scribn.Soreng 7422 (US)USA ColoradoGQ324543KX118730GQ324450KY378882KY378848
HP+H Homalopoa s.s. Poaasiae-minoris H. Scholz & ByfieldSoreng et al. 8100 (US)Turkey MH921327 MH921311 MH921394 MH921343 MH921368
HP+H Homalopoa s.s. Poachaixii Vill.Soreng 4677 (US)RussiaEU792404GQ324299EU854590KM523890KM524003
HP+H Homalopoa s.s. Poa chaixii Soreng 7524 (US)GermanyGQ324493GQ324300GQ324405 MH921346 MH921371
HP+H Homalopoa s.s. Poamasendarana Freyn & Sint.Assadi (TARI 73254)IranKX118743KX118725KX118761 MH921351 MH921376
HP+H Homalopoa s.s. Poaoccidentalis VaseyPeterson & Valdes Rena 18918 (US)MexicoKU756540KU763436KU763514KY378877KY378843
HP+H Homalopoa s.s. Poaremota ForsellesSoreng et al. 7540 (US)Kyrgyz RepublicGQ324545GQ324372GQ324452KY378883KY378849
HP+H Madropoa Poafendleriana (Steud.) VaseyGillespie 6292 (CAN)USA, ColoradoEU792403GQ324319DQ354027KY378869KY378835
HP+Hunclassified (supersect. Homalopoa)Poacalycina (J. Presl) KunthPeterson et al. 17923 (US)PeruEU792425KU763395EU792467KY378864KY378830
HP+Hunclassified (supersect. Homalopoa)Poamarshallii TovarPeterson et al. 21546 (US)PeruKM523799KM523726KM524086KM523895KM524008
JJ Jubatae Poajubata A. Kern.Soreng et al. 9029-2 (US)TurkeyKY378810KY378820KY378814KY378873KY378839
JJ Jubatae Poa jubata Soreng et al. 9266 (US)TurkeyKY378811KY378821KY378815KY378874KY378840
MM Micrantherae Poainfirma KunthCatalan 3-2000 (UZ)SpainGQ324516GQ324334GQ324427KY378871KY378837
MM Micrantherae Poasupina Schrad.Soreng & Cayouette 5950-2 (US)USA, cult. (from Europe)EU792387GQ324383DQ353984KY378888KY378854
NN Nanopoa Poatrichophylla Heldr. & Sart. ex Boiss.Soreng et al. 7508 (US)GreeceGQ324554GQ324386GQ324461KY378889KY378855
NNunclassifiedPoadolosa Boiss. & Heldr.Soreng et al. 7495-1 (US)GreeceGQ324502GQ324312GQ324414KM523891KM524004.2
NNunclassifiedPoaiconiavar.pelasgis (H. Scholz) SorengGillespie et al. 10492 (CAN)TurkeyKX118744KX118726KX118762MH898827MH898844
NNunclassifiedPoaursina Velen.Stoneberg SH17 (US)BulgariaGQ324527GQ324352GQ324437KY378892KY378858
NS Secundae Poacurtifolia Scribn.Soreng & Soreng 6347c-1 (US)USA, WashingtonEU792394KY378819DQ353994.2KY378867KY378833
NS Secundae Poa secunda J. Presl. subsp. secunda Soreng & Soreng 5812 (US)USA, NevadaEU792393KU763450DQ353991KY378884KY378850
NS Secundae Poastenantha Trin.Soreng & Soreng 6068-1 (US)USA, AlaskaKU756554KU763455DQ354057.2KY378887KY378853
PP+H Macropoa Poadensa TroitskySoreng & Cabi 9306 (US)TurkeyKX118738KX118720KX118755 MH921347 MH921372
PP+H Macropoa Poabucharica Roshev.Soreng et al. 7662 (US)Kyrgyz RepublicKX118735KX118717KX118752KY378862KY378828
PP+H Macropoa Poadiversifolia (Boiss. & Balansa) Hack. ex Boiss.Gillespie et al. 10529 (CAN)TurkeyKX118739KX118721KX118756 MH921348 MH921373
PP+H Macropoa Poaiberica Fisch. & C.A. Mey.Soreng et al. 7977 (US)Russia, Cabardino-BalkariaKX118741KX118723KX118758 MH921349 MH921374
PP+H Macropoa Poa longifolia Trin. subsp. longifolia Soreng et al. 7945 (US)Russia, Cabardino-BalkariaKX118742KX118724KX118760 MH921350 MH921375
PP+H Macropoa Poa sibirica Roshev. subsp. sibirica Olonova 2003-45 (CAN)Russia, KhakasiaGQ324547KY378824GQ324455KY378885KY378851
PP+H Poa Poairkutica Roshev.Kasanovskiy 2002-7 (CAN)Russia, IrkutskEU792402GQ324335DQ354007.2KY378872KY378838
PP+H Poa Poa pratensis L. subsp. pratensis Gillespie et al. 10592 (CAN)TurkeyKX118746KX118726KX118764KY378880KY378846
PX Malacanthae Poa arctica R. Br. subsp. arctica Gillespie & Aiken 5701 (CAN)Canada, NunavutGQ324487GQ324291DQ354009KY378860KY378826
RR Parodiochloa Poacookii (Hook.f.) Hook.f.Hennion Gen1 (P)Subantarctic Islands, Crozet I.EU792383GQ324306EU792454KY378866KY378832
RR Parodiochloa Poaflabellata (Lam.) RaspailWright 9NSG (not vouchered)South Georgia IslandsEU792381GQ324321EU792453KM523892KM524005
SS Abbreviatae Poa flexuosa Sm. subsp. flexuosa Brochmann 2000-3-1 (CAN)NorwayGQ324520GQ324342GQ324418KY378875KY378841
SS Abbreviatae Poapseudoabbreviata Roshev.Soreng & Soreng 6032-1 (US)USA, AlaskaEU792398GQ324370DQ353997KY378881KY378847
SS Stenopoa Poabiebersteinii H.N. Pojark. (cf)Gillespie & Cabi 10327 (CAN)TurkeyKY944706KY944668KY987089KY944622KY987044
SS Stenopoa Poaglauca VahlGillespie 5804 (CAN)Canada, NunavutAY237839GQ324324GQ324421KY378870KY378836
SS Stenopoa Poapalustris L.Gillespie 6461 (CAN)Canada, OntarioEU792396KY378822DQ354000KY378878KY378844
SS Tichopoa Poacompressa L.Gillespie 6457 (CAN)Canada, QuebecEU792395KY378818DQ354003KY378865KY378831
VV Pandemos Poa trivialis L. subsp. trivialis Soreng 4681-1 (US)USA, Maryland (introd.)GQ324555GQ324387GQ324462KY378891KY378857
VV Pandemos Poatrivialissubsp.sylvicola (Guss.) H. Lindb.Gillespie et al. 10368 (CAN)TurkeyKY378813KY378825KY378817KY378890KY378856
YY Sylvestres Poaautumnalis ElliottSoreng 4680 (US)USA, MarylandEU792379GQ324294DQ353979KM523889KM524002
YY Sylvestres Poasaltuensis Fernald & WiegandGillespie 7043 (CAN)Canada, OntarioEU792378GQ324374EU792451KM523899KM524012
YY Sylvestres Poawolfii Scribn.Soreng & Soreng 5800 (US)USA, MissouriEU792377GQ324389.2AH015556.2KY378893KY378859
outgroupArctagrostislatifolia (R. Br.) Griseb.Gillespie et al. 6586 (CAN)Canada, NunavutEU792351GQ324245DQ353969KM523924KM523954
outgroupMiliumeffusum L.Soreng 7771 (US)SwedenKM523785KM523711KM524072KM523870KM523983
outgroupNicoraepoaandina (Trin.) Soreng & L.J. GillespieSoreng & Soreng 7182 (US)ChileEU792354GQ324275DQ353971KM523874KM523987
outgroupPhleummontanum K. KochGillespie et al. 10614-2 (CAN)TurkeyKM523793KM523720KM524081KM523883KM523996
outgroupPhleum pratense L.Soreng 7943 (US)Russia, StavropolKM523796KM523723KM524084KM523886KM523999
  3 in total

1.  jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing.

Authors:  Diego Darriba; Guillermo L Taboada; Ramón Doallo; David Posada
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Rapid and recent world-wide diversification of bluegrasses (Poa, Poaceae) and related genera.

Authors:  Matthias H Hoffmann; Julia Schneider; Philipp Hase; Martin Röser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Flora of Mongolia: annotated checklist of native vascular plants.

Authors:  Shukherdorj Baasanmunkh; Magsar Urgamal; Batlai Oyuntsetseg; Alexander P Sukhorukov; Zagarjav Tsegmed; Dong Chan Son; Andrey Erst; Khurelpurev Oyundelger; Alexey A Kechaykin; Joscelyn Norris; Petr Kosachev; Jin-Shuang Ma; Kae Sun Chang; Hyeok Jae Choi
Journal:  PhytoKeys       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.635

2.  Intragenomic Polymorphism of the ITS 1 Region of 35S rRNA Gene in the Group of Grasses with Two-Chromosome Species: Different Genome Composition in Closely Related Zingeria Species.

Authors:  Alexander V Rodionov; Alexander A Gnutikov; Nikolai N Nosov; Eduard M Machs; Yulia V Mikhaylova; Victoria S Shneyer; Elizaveta O Punina
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.