| Literature DB >> 30505015 |
Justyna Sołowiej-Chmiel1, Matylda Sierakowska2.
Abstract
Chronic illness is a strong stressor, and its occurrence in human life forces the individual to make adaptive changes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the reactions, behaviors, and emotional states of a person in the face of systemic connective tissue disease and ways of coping with this difficult situation. The method of choice was an individual case study. The subject was a 41-year-old patient, diagnosed with diffuse systemic sclerosis (dSSc) 8 years previously. The patient was characterized by lowered self-esteem, the presence of depressive symptoms, low level of hope for success, a reduced sense of competence, a tendency to use stress coping strategies focused on emotions and dominance of anxiety and tension. Emotional stress coping strategies, low level of hope for success, and non-acceptance attitude predispose the person suffering from systemic sclerosis (SSc) to exhibit depressive symptoms.Entities:
Keywords: acceptance of the disease; emotional functioning; self-esteem; systemic sclerosis
Year: 2018 PMID: 30505015 PMCID: PMC6263309 DOI: 10.5114/reum.2018.79504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reumatologia ISSN: 0034-6233
The attitude towards connective tissue disease
| Dimension name | Raw result | Items number | Average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation factor of own disease | |||
| Threat | 38 | 8 | 4.75 |
| Benefit | 9 | 7 | 1.29 |
| Obstacle/loss | 19 | 7 | 2.71 |
| Challenge | 21 | 6 | 3.5 |
| Harm | 23 | 7 | 3.29 |
| Value | 22 | 6 | 3.67 |
| Meaning | 10 | 5 | 2.0 |
Fig. 1Attitude towards the disease – intraprofile comparison.
Subject self-esteem, functioning in emotional aspect, coping with stress
| Dimenson name | Raw result with confidential intervals | Stens with confidential intervals | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| General self-esteem | 22 (23–25) | 2 (1–3) | Low |
| Competence | 26 (22–30) | 3 (1–5) | Low |
| Beeing loved | 32 (28–36) | 4 (3–6) | Lowered |
| Popularity | 25 (22–28) | 2 (1–3) | Low |
| Leadership skills | 22 (18–26) | 3 (2–4) | Low |
| Self control | 30 (26–34) | 5 (3–6) | Average |
| Moral self acceptance | 45 (41–49) | 10 (7–10) | Very high |
| Physical attractiveness | 15 (11–19) | 1 (1–2) | Very low |
| Vitality | 15 (11–19) | 1 (1–2) | Very low |
| Identity integrity | 30 (26–34) | 5 (3–6) | Average |
| Defensive self-esteem increasing | 49 (43–55) | 5 (3–6) | Average |
| Hedonistic tone (HT) | 31 (29–33) | 5 (4–6) | Average |
| Tension stimulation (TS) | 18 (15–21) | 6 (5–7) | Average |
| Energetic stimulation (ES) | 30 (27–33) | 5 (4–6) | Average |
| Finding solutions | 17 | 2 | Low |
| The Power of Will | 17 | 3 | Low |
| Hope for success | 34 | 2 | Low |
| General result | 58 points | ||
| Concentrated on task style | 53 (49–57) | 5 (4–5) | Average |
| Emotions concentrated style | 48 (43–53) | 6 (5–7) | Average |
| Engaging in substitute activities | 10 (6–14) | 2 (1–4) | Low |
| Looking for social contact | 15 (12–18) | 5 (3–6) | Average |
| Avoidance concentrated style | 31 (25–37) | 3 (1–4) | Low |