X L Fan1, J D P Bezerra2, C M Tian1, P W Crous3,4,5. 1. The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China. 2. Departamento de Micologia Prof. Chaves Batista, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Centro de Biociências, Cidade Universitária, CEP: 50670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil. 3. Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Wageningen University and Research Centre (WUR), Laboratory of Phytopathology, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.
Abstract
In this study we accept 25 families in Diaporthales based on phylogenetic analyses using partial ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tef1-α gene sequences. Four different families associated with canker and dieback of tree hosts are morphologically treated and phylogenetically compared. These include three new families (Diaporthostomataceae, Pseudomelanconidaceae, Synnemasporellaceae), and one new genus, Dendrostoma (Erythrogloeaceae). Dendrostoma is newly described from Malus spectabilis, Osmanthus fragrans and Quercus acutissima having fusoid to cylindrical, bicellular ascospores, with three new species namely D. mali, D. osmanthi and D. quercinum. Diaporthostomataceae is characterised by conical and discrete perithecia with bicellular, fusoid ascospores on branches of Machilus leptophylla. Pseudomelanconidaceae is defined by conidiogenous cells with apical collarets and discreet annellations, and the inconspicuous hyaline conidial sheath when mature on Carya cathayensis, compared to morphologically similar families Melanconidaceae and Juglanconidaceae. Synnemasporellaceae is proposed to accommodate fungi with synnematous conidiomata, with descriptions of S. toxicodendri on Toxicodendron sylvestre and S. aculeans on Rhus copallina.
In this study we accept 25 families in Diaporthales based on phylogenetic analyses using partial ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tef1-α gene sequences. Four different families associated with canker and dieback of tree hosts are morphologically treated and phylogenetically compared. These include three new families (Diaporthostomataceae, Pseudomelanconidaceae, Synnemasporellaceae), and one new genus, Dendrostoma (Erythrogloeaceae). Dendrostoma is newly described from Malus spectabilis, Osmanthus fragrans and Quercus acutissima having fusoid to cylindrical, bicellular ascospores, with three new species namely D. mali, D. osmanthi and D. quercinum. Diaporthostomataceae is characterised by conical and discrete perithecia with bicellular, fusoid ascospores on branches of Machilus leptophylla. Pseudomelanconidaceae is defined by conidiogenous cells with apical collarets and discreet annellations, and the inconspicuous hyaline conidial sheath when mature on Carya cathayensis, compared to morphologically similar families Melanconidaceae and Juglanconidaceae. Synnemasporellaceae is proposed to accommodate fungi with synnematous conidiomata, with descriptions of S. toxicodendri on Toxicodendron sylvestre and S. aculeans on Rhus copallina.
Diaporthales represents an important order in Sordariomycetes containing taxa that are mainly isolated as endophytes, saprobes or plant pathogens on various hosts. The order is characterised by perithecia with elongate beaks, often forming within stromatic tissues, deliquescent paraphyses and asci that generally deliquesce, become detached from the perithecial wall when mature, and have a characteristic refractive apical annulus (Rossman et al. 2007). Members of diaporthalean fungi are responsible for several diseases causing severe damage in plants with economic importance. The most notorious is chestnut blight caused by Cryphonectria parasitica (Cryphonectriaceae) that devastated American chestnut (Castanea dentata) populations in North America (Anagnostakis 1987, Gryzenhout et al. 2006). Other common diseases include ash anthracnose due to Gnomoniella fraxinii and birch canker caused by Cryptosporella platyphylla (Gnomoniaceae) (Redlin & Stack 1988, Fan et al. 2016a), stem-end rot of citrus fruits infected by Diaporthe citri and walnut canker by Diaporthe rostrata (Diaporthaceae) (Huang et al. 2013, 2015, Fan et al. 2015b, Guarnaccia & Crous 2017), willow and walnut canker disease caused by Cytospora chrysosperma (Cytosporaceae) (Fan et al. 2014, 2015a), birch dieback disease resulting from Melanconis stilbostoma (Melanconidaceae) (Fan et al. 2016b), walnut dieback disease by Juglanconis juglandina and J. oblonga (in Juglanconidaceae) (Voglmayr et al. 2017), foliar diseases of Eucalyptus by Harknessia spp. (Harknessiaceae) (Crous et al. 2012), and foliar, fruit and stem diseases by Coniella spp. (Schizoparmaceae) (Alvarez et al. 2016, Marin-Felix et al. 2017).The classification of Diaporthales has changed drastically over the past decades because of the plasticity and variability in morphology. The order Diaporthales and Valsales were first introduced by Nannfeldt (1932), based on subfamilies Eu-Diaportheen and Valseen in Diaportheaceae proposed by Von Höhnel (1917). Later, Diaporthaceae and ‘Valsaceae’ (now Cytosporaceae, and referred to as such below) were recognised in the Diaporthales by Von Arx & Müller (1954). Kobayashi (1970) proposed Diaporthaceae (including Valsa = Cytospora) in a wide concept including all taxa accepted in Diaporthales by Barr (1978). Wehmeyer & Hanlin (1975) accepted three families within this order, including non-allantoid spored Gnomoniaceae and Diaporthaceae separated on the presence or absence of a stroma, and Cytosporaceae with allantoid ascospores. Barr (1978) arranged four families (Gnomoniaceae, Melanconidaceae, Pseudovalsaceae and Cytosporaceae) in Diaporthales based on beak position of ascomata and thin or firm ascospore walls without special emphasis on allantoid or non-allantoid ascospores. Families within the Diaporthales have been segregated by several mycologists to utilise various criteria: stromatic tissues, arrangement of ascomata in the stroma or substrate, and ascospore shape, e.g., four families (Cytosporaceae, Endoxylaceae, Gnomoniaceae and Melanconidaceae) by Monod (1983), three families (Cytosporaceae, Melanconidaceae and Phyllachoraceae) by Cannon (1988), while Hawksworth et al. (1995) merged the Cytosporaceae, Gnomoniaceae and Melanconidaceae proposed by Barr (1990) to Cytosporaceae and Melanconidaceae. These changes and confusions suggested that phenotypic characters alone were unable to provide sufficient evidence to resolve phylogenetic and evolutionary patterns among these fungi.Molecular studies on fungi began in the early 1990s, and since then ribosomal DNA sequence data were accepted as the standard gene loci for fungi (Berbee & Taylor 1992, Schoch et al. 2012). Zhang & Blackwell (2001) recognised three lineages in Diaporthales, while Castlebury et al. (2002) postulated six major lineages, namely the Cryphonectria-Endothia complex, Cytosporaceae s.str., Diaporthaceae s.str., Gnomoniaceae s.str., Melanconidaceae s.str. and the Schizoparme complex. When Rossman et al. (2007) reviewed the Diaporthales, nine families were recognised, i.e., Cryphonectriaceae, Cytosporaceae, Diaporthaceae, Gnomoniaceae, Melanconidaceae, Pseudovalsaceae, Schizoparmeaceae, Sydowiellaceae and Togniniaceae. Kirk et al. (2008) added Melogrammataceae and listed 10 families in this order, whereas Jaklitsch & Voglmayr (2012) placed Melogrammataceae within Xylariales rather than Diaporthales. Subsequently, the Pseudoplagiostomataceae, Harknessiaceae, Macrohilaceae and Tirisporellaceae were also added to the Diaporthales (Cheewangkoon et al. 2010, Crous et al. 2012, 2015, Suetrong et al. 2015). Voglmayr & Jaklitsch (2014) resurrected Stilbosporaceae, while the Togniniaceae and Tirisporellaceae were reallocated to the Togniniales and Tirisporellales (Gramaje et al. 2015, Jones et al. 2015). Later, Lamproconiaceae and Juglanconidaceae were proposed as new families in this order (Norphanphoun et al. 2016, Voglmayr et al. 2017). The recent outline of Diaporthales published by Senanayake et al. (2017) used morphological and phylogenetic evidence to introduce seven new families and accepted a total of 21 families in the order. In spite of these changes, the phylogenetic placement of many genera in the Diaporthales remains unknown, and many families still wait to be elucidated.During the trips to collect forest pathogens that cause canker or dieback diseases in China, several diaporthalean taxa associated with various disease symptoms were collected in Jiangxi and Zhejiang Provinces, China. Because the higher-level phylogeny of many genera within the Diaporthales remains largely unresolved, this project was initiated to address this issue. In this paper, we propose three new families and one new genus as well as several new species.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolation
Fresh specimens of diaporthalean fungi were collected from infected branches of seven hosts during collection trips in China (Table 1). A total of 20 isolates were established by removing a mucoid spore mass from ascomata or conidiomata, spreading the suspension on the surface of 1.8 % potato dextrose agar (PDA), and incubating at 25 °C for up to 24 h. Single germinating conidia/ascospores were removed and plated onto fresh PDA plates. Specimens and isolates were deposited in the Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of the Ministry of Education in the Beijing Forestry University (BJFU) and the working Collection of X.L. Fan (CF) housed at the BJFU. Axenic cultures are maintained in the China Forestry Culture Collection Centre (CFCC).
Table 1
Details of the strains included for molecular study.
Species
Culture
Location
Host
GenBank accession numbers
ITS
LSU
rpb2
tef1-α
Apiosporopsis carpinea
CBS 771.79
Switzerland
Carpinus betulus
NA
AF277130
NA
NA
Apiosporopsis sp.
Masuya 11Af2-1
Japan
Alnus firma
NA
AB669034
NA
NA
Apoharknessia insueta
CBS 111377
Brazil
Eucalyptus pellita
JQ706083
AY720814
NA
NA
CBS 114575
Colombia
Eucalyptus sp.
NA
AY720813
NA
NA
Asterosporium asterospermum
MFLU 15-3555
Italy
Fagus sylvatica
NA
MF190062
MF377615
NA
CBS 112404
Italy
Fagus sylvatica
NA
AB553745
NA
NA
KT2138
Japan
Fagus crenata
NA
AB553744
NA
NA
Auratiopycnidiella tristaniopsidis
CBS 132180 = CPC 16371
Australia
Tristaniopsis laurina
JQ685516
JQ685522
NA
NA
Cainiella johansonii
Kruys 731
Sweden
Dryas octopetala
NA
JF701920
NA
NA
Chapeckia nigrospora
AR 3809
USA
Betula sp.
JF681957
EU683068
NA
NA
Chiangraiomyces bauhiniae
MFLUCC 17-1669
Thailand
Bauhinia sp.
MF190118
MF190064
MF377604
NA
MFLUCC 17-1670
Thailand
Bauhinia sp.
MF190119
MF190065
MF377603
NA
Chrysocrypta corymbiae
CBS 132528
Australia
Corymbia sp.
JX069867
JX069851
NA
NA
Coniella diplodiella
CBS 111858 = CPC 3708
France
Vitis vinifera
AY339323
AY339284
KX833423
KX833603
Coniella koreana
CBS 143.97
Korea
NA
KX833584
AF408378
KX833490
KX833684
Coniella musaiensis var. hibisci
AR 3534 = CBS 109757
South Africa
Hibiscus sp.
KX833589
AF408337
NA
KX833689
Coniella straminea
CBS 149.22 = CPC 3932
USA
Fragaria sp.
AY339348
AF362569
KX833506
KX833704
Coniella wangiensis
CBS 132530 = CPC 19397
Australia
Eucalyptus sp.
JX069873
JX069857
KX833509
KX833705
Coryneum depressum
AR 3897
Austria
Quercus cerris
NA
EU683074
NA
NA
Coryneum modonium
AR 3558
Austria
Castanea sativa
NA
EU683073
NA
NA
Coryneum umbonatum
AR 3541
Austria
Quercus cerris
NA
EU683072
NA
NA
MFLUCC 15-1110
Italy
Quercus sp.
MF190121
MF190067
MF377610
NA
MFLUCC 13-0658
Italy
Quercus sp.
MF190120
MF190066
MF377609
NA
Cryphonectria macrospora
AR 3444 = CBS 109764
Russia
Quercus mongolica
EU199182
AF408340
EU220029
NA
Cryphonectria nitschkei
AR 3433 = CBS 109776
Russia
Quercus mongolica
DQ120761
AF408341
NA
NA
Cryphonectria parasitica
ATCC 38755
USA
Castanea dentata
AY141856
EU199123
DQ862017
EU222014
Cryptodiaporthe aesculi
CBS 109765 = AFTOL-ID 1238
Austria
Aesculus hippocastanum
DQ323530
AF408342
EU199138
GU354004
AR3640 = CBS 121905
USA
Aesculus hippocastanum
EU254994
EU255164
EU219269
DQ313558
LCM 447.01
Germany
Aesculus hippocastanum
GU367076
NA
GU367110
GU354002
Cryptosporella betulae
AR 3524 = CBS 109763
Austria
Betula pendula
EU199180
AF408375
EU199139
EU221884
Cryptosporella hypodermia
AR 3552
Austria
Ulmus minor
EU199181
AF408346
EU199140
NA
Cryptosporella suffusa
AR 3496 = CBS 109750
Austria
Alnus incana
EU199207
AF408376
EU199163
EU221945
Cytospora cenisia
AR 3522 = CBS 109752
Austria
Juniperus communis
NA
AF408385
NA
NA
Cytospora chrysosperma
CFCC 89600
China
Sophora japonica
KR045623
KR045623
KU710951
KU710915
Cytospora elaeagni
CFCC 89633
China
Elaeagnus angustifolia
KF765677
KF765693
KU710956
KU710919
Cytospora leucostoma
CFCC 50468
China
Betula platyphylla
KT732949
KT732968
NA
NA
Cytospora nivea
AR 3512
Austria
Salix purpurea
NA
AF408367
NA
NA
Cytospora sacculus
AR 3416= CBS 109756
Russia
Quercus mongolica
NA
AF408386
NA
NA
AR 3426 = CBS 109777
Austria
Quercus robur
NA
AF408387
NA
NA
Dendrostoma mali
CFCC 52102*
China
Malus spectabilis
MG682072
MG682012
MG682032
MG682052
Dendrostoma osmanthi
CFCC 52106*
China
Osmanthus fragrans
MG682073
MG682013
MG682033
MG682053
CFCC 52107*
China
Osmanthus fragrans
MG682074
MG682014
MG682034
MG682054
CFCC 52108*
China
Osmanthus fragrans
MG682075
MG682015
MG682035
MG682055
CFCC 52109*
China
Osmanthus fragrans
MG682076
MG682016
MG682036
MG682056
Dendrostoma quercinum
CFCC 52103*
China
Quercus acutissima
MG682077
MG682017
MG682037
MG682057
CFCC 52104*
China
Quercus acutissima
MG682078
MG682018
MG682038
MG682058
CFCC 52105*
China
Quercus acutissima
MG682079
MG682019
MG682039
MG682059
Diaporthe decedens
AR 3459 = CBS 109772
Austria
Corylus avellana
KC343059
AF408348
NA
NA
Diaporthe detrusa
AR 3424 = CBS 109770
Austria
Berberis vulgaris
KC343061
AF408349
NA
KC343787
Diaporthe eres
AR 3538 = CBS 109767
Austria
Acer campestre
KC343075
AF408350
NA
KC343801
Diaporthella corylina
CBS 121124
China
Corylus sp.
KC343004
NA
NA
NA
Diaporthella sp.
CN 5
Italy
Corylus avellana
KP205483
NA
NA
NA
CN13
Italy
Corylus avellana
KP205484
NA
NA
NA
Diaporthosporella cercidicola
CFCC 51994
China
Cercis chinensis
KY852492
KY852515
NA
NA
CFCC 51995
China
Cercis chinensis
KY852493
KY852516
NA
NA
CFCC 51996
China
Cercis chinensis
KY852494
KY852517
NA
NA
Diaporthostoma machili
CFCC 52100*
China
Machilus leptophylla
MG682080
MG682020
MG682040
MG682060
CFCC 52101*
China
Machilus leptophylla
MG682081
MG682021
MG682041
MG682061
Disculoides eucalypti
CPC 17650
Australia
Eucalyptus sp.
JQ685517
JQ685523
NA
NA
Disculoides eucalyptorum
CBS 132184 = CPC 17648
Australia
Eucalyptus viminalis
NR120090
JQ685524
NA
NA
Ditopella ditopa
AR 3423 = CBS 109748
Austria
Alnus glutinosa
EU199187
EU199126
EU199145
NA
Erythrogloeum hymenaeae
CPC 18819
Brazil
Hymenaea courbaril
JQ685519
JQ685525
NA
NA
Gnomonia gnomon
CBS 199.53
Italy
Corylus avellana
AY818956
AF408361
EU219295
EU221885
Harknessia eucalypti
CBS 342.97
Australia
Eucalyptus regnans
AY720745
AF408363
NA
NA
Harknessia molokaiensis
AR 3578 = CBS 109779
USA
Eucalyptus robusta
NA
AF408390
NA
NA
Hercospora tiliae
AR 3526
Austria
Tilia tomentosa
NA
AF408365
NA
NA
Hyaliappendispora galii
MFLUCC 16-1208
Italy
Galium sp.
MF190149
MF190095
NA
NA
Juglanconis appendiculata
D96
Austria
Juglans nigra
KY427139
KY427139
KY427189
KY427208
Juglanconis juglandina
ME23
Austria
Juglans nigra
KY427150
KY427150
KY427200
KY427219
Juglanconis oblonga
ME14
USA
Juglans cinerea
KY427151
KY427151
KY427201
KY427220
Juglanconis pterocaryae
ME20
Japan
Pterocarya rhoifolia
KY427155
KY427155
KY427205
KY427224
Lamproconium desmazieri
MFLUCC 14-1047
Russia
Tilia cordata
KX430132
KX430133
NA
MF377592
MFLUCC 15-0870
Russia
Tilia tomentosa
KX430134
KX430135
MF377605
MF377591
Lasmenia sp.
CBS 124123
Puerto Rico
Nephelium lappaceum
GU797406
JF838338
NA
NA
CBS 124124
Puerto Rico
Nephelium lappaceum
JF838336
JF838341
NA
NA
Luteocirrhus shearii
CBS 130776
Australia
Banksia baxteri
NR120254
NG042770
NA
NA
Macrohilum eucalypti
CPC 10945
New Zealand
Eucalyptus sp.
DQ195781
DQ195793
NA
NA
CPC 19421
Australia
Eucalyptus piperita
KR873244
KR873275
NA
NA
Melanconiella ellisii
BPI 878343
USA
Carpinus caroliniana
JQ926271
JQ926271
JQ926339
JQ926406
Melanconiella hyperopta
AR 3832 = CBS 131492
Austria
Carpinus betulus
JQ926278
JQ926278
NA
NA
Melanconiella spodiaea
MSH
Austria
Carpinus betulus
JQ926298
JQ926298
JQ926364
JQ926431
Melanconis alni
AR 3748
Austria
Alnus viridis
EU199195
EU199130
EU199153
NA
Melanconis betulae
CFCC 50471
China
Betula albosinensis
KT732952
KT732971
KT732984
KT733001
Melanconis itoana
CFCC 50474
China
Betula albosinensis
KT732955
KT732974
KT732987
KT733004
Melanconis marginalis
AR 3442 = CBS 109744
Canada
Alnus rubra
EU199197
AF408373
EU219301
EU221991
Melanconis stilbostoma
CFCC 50475
China
Betula platyphylla
KT732956
KT732975
KT732988
KT733005
Nakataea oryzae
CBS 243.76
NA
NA
KM484861
DQ341498
NA
NA
Ophiodiaporthe cyatheae
YMJ1364
China
Cyathea lepifera
JX570889
JX570891
JX570893
NA
Pachytrype princeps
Rogers S
USA
NA
NA
FJ532382
NA
NA
Pachytrype rimosa
FF1066
Costa Rica
NA
NA
FJ532381
NA
NA
Paradiaporthe artemisiae
MFLUCC 14-0850
Italy
Artemisia sp.
MF190155
MF190100
NA
NA
MFLUCC 17-1663
Italy
Artemisia sp.
MF190156
MF190101
NA
NA
Phaeoappendispora thailandensis
MFLUCC 13-0161
Thailand
Quercus sp.
MF190157
MF190102
MF377613
NA
Phaeodiaporthe appendiculata
CBS 123821 = D77
Austria
Acer campestre
KF570156
KF570156
NA
NA
CBS 123809 = D76
Austria
Acer campestre
KF570155
KF570155
NA
NA
Phragmoporthe conformis
AR 3632 = CBS 109783
Canada
Alnus rubra
DQ323527
AF408377
NA
NA
Plagiostoma euphorbiae
CBS 340.78
Netherlands
Euphorbia palustris
EU199198
AF408382
DQ368643
NA
Plagiostoma salicellum
AR 3455 = CBS 109775
Austria
Salix sp.
DQ323529
AF408345
EU199141
EU221916
Prosopidicola mexicana
CBS 113530
USA
Prosopis glandulosa
AY720710
NA
NA
NA
CBS 113529
USA
Prosopis glandulosa
AY720709
KX228354
NA
NA
Pseudomelanconis caryae
CFCC 52110*
China
Carya cathayensis
MG682082
MG682022
MG682042
MG682062
CFCC 52111*
China
Carya cathayensis
MG682083
MG682023
MG682043
MG682063
CFCC 52112*
China
Carya cathayensis
MG682084
MG682024
MG682044
MG682064
CFCC 52113*
China
Carya cathayensis
MG682085
MG682025
MG682045
MG682065
Pseudoplagiostoma eucalypti
CBS 124807
Venezuela
Eucalyptus urophylla
GU973512
GU973606
NA
NA
CBS 116382
Thailand
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
GU973514
GU973608
NA
NA
Pseudoplagiostoma oldii
CBS 115722
Australia
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
GU973535
GU973610
NA
NA
Pseudoplagiostoma variabile
CBS 113067
Uruguay
Eucalyptus globulus
GU973536
GU973611
NA
NA
Pyricularia grisea
Ina168
NA
NA
AB026819
AB026819
NA
NA
Rossmania ukurunduensis
AR 3484
Russia
Acer ukurunduense
NA
EU683075
NA
NA
Sillia ferruginea
AR 3440 = CBS 126567
Austria
Corylus avellana
JF681959
EU683076
NA
NA
Stegonsporium protopyriforme
CBS 117041
Austria
Acer pseudoplatanus
NR126119
EU039992
NA
NA
Stegonsporium pyriforme
CBS 124487
UK
Acer heldreichii
KF570160
KF570160
KF570190
NA
Stilbospora macrosperma
CBS 121883
Austria
Carpinus betulus
JX517290
JX517299
KF570196
NA
CBS 121695
Netherlands
Carpinus betulus
JX517288
JX517297
NA
NA
Sydowiella depressula
CBS 813.79
Switzerland
Rubus sp.
NA
EU683077
NA
NA
Sydowiella fenestrans
AR 3777 = CBS 125530
Russia
Chamerion angustifolium
JF681956
EU683078
NA
NA
Synnemasporella aculeans
CFCC 52094*
China
Rhus chinensis
MG682086
MG682026
MG682046
MG682066
CFCC 52095*
China
Rhus chinensis
MG682087
MG682027
MG682047
MG682067
CFCC 52096*
China
Rhus chinensis
MG682088
MG682028
MG682048
MG682068
AR 3878 = CBS 126566
USA
Rhus glabra
NA
EU255134
NA
NA
Synnemasporella toxicodendri
CFCC 52097*
China
Toxicodendron sylvestre
MG682089
MG682029
MG682049
MG682069
CFCC 52098*
China
Toxicodendron sylvestre
MG682090
MG682030
MG682050
MG682070
CFCC 52099*
China
Toxicodendron sylvestre
MG682091
MG682031
MG682051
MG682071
Note: CBS: Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre), Utrecht, The Netherlands; CFCC: China Forestry Culture Collection Center, Beijing, China; CPC: Culture collection of Pedro Crous, The Netherlands; MFLU: Mae Fah Luang University herbarium, Thailand; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Thailand; NA: not applicable. All the new isolates used in this study are marked by an asterisk (*) and the strains from generic type species are in bold.
Morphology
Species identification was based on morphological features of the ascomata or conidiomata produced on infected plant tissues and micromorphology, supplemented by cultural characteristics. Cross-sections were prepared by hand using a double-edge blade under a dissecting microscope. At least 10 conidiomata/ascomata, 10 asci and 30 conidia/ascospores were measured to calculate the mean size and standard deviation (SD). Microscopic photographs were captured with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope equipped with a Nikon digital sight DS-Ri2 high definition colour camera, using differential interference contrast (DIC) illumination and the Nikon software NIS-Elements D Package v. 3.00. Adobe Bridge CS v. 6 and Adobe Photoshop CS v. 5 were used for the manual editing. Nomenclatural novelties and descriptions were deposited in MycoBank (Crous et al. 2004). Colony diameters were measured, and the colony colours described after 3 wk according to the colour charts of Rayner (1970).
DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted using a modified CTAB method, with fungal mycelium harvested from PDA plates with cellophane (Doyle & Doyle 1990). The ITS region was amplified with the primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al. 1990), the LSU region with the primers LR0R and LR5 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990), the rpb2 region with primers fRPB2-5F and fRPB2-7cR (Liu et al. 1999), and the tef1-α gene with the primers EF1-728F and EF1-986R (Carbone & Kohn 1999). The PCR mixture for all regions consisted of 1 μL genomic DNA, 3 mM MgCl2, 20 μM of each dNTP, 0.2 μM of each primer and 0.25 U BIOTAQ DNA polymerase (Bioline). Conditions for PCR of ITS and LSU genes constituted an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 51 °C and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final denaturation step of 8 min at 72 °C, while the tef1-α gene was performed using an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 56 °C and 1 min at 72 °C, and a final denaturation step of 8 min at 72 °C. For the rpb2 amplification, conditions consisted of five cycles of 45 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 56 °C and 2 min at 72 °C, then five cycles with a 53 °C annealing temperature and 30 cycles with a 50 °C annealing temperature. The DNA sequencing was performed using an ABI PRISM® 3730XL DNA Analyzer with BigDye® Terminater Kit v. 3.1 (Invitrogen) at the Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology Company Limited (Beijing, China).
Molecular data analyses
DNA sequences generated by each primer combination were used to obtain consensus sequences using SeqMan v. 7.1.0 in the DNASTAR Lasergene Core Suite software (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA). Reference sequences were selected based on ex-type or ex-epitype sequences available from relevant published literature (Rossman et al. 2007, Cheewangkoon et al. 2010, Crous et al. 2012, 2015, Suetrong et al. 2015, Norphanphoun et al. 2016, Hongsanan et al. 2017, Senanayake et al. 2017, Voglmayr et al. 2017) (Table 1). All sequences were aligned using MAFFT v. 6 (Katoh & Toh 2010) and edited manually using MEGA v. 6 (Tamura et al. 2013). Phylogenetic analyses were performed using PAUP v. 4.0b10 for maximum parsimony (MP) analysis (Swofford 2003), MrBayes v. 3.1.2 for Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003), and PhyML v. 7.2.8 for Maximum Likelihood (ML) analysis (Guindon et al. 2010). The first analyses were performed on the combined multi-gene dataset (ITS, LSU, rpb2, tef1-α) to compare isolates of Diaporthales species to ex-type sequence data from recent studies (Table 1).A partition homogeneity test (PHT) with heuristic search and 1 000 replicates was performed using PAUP v. 4.0b10 to test the discrepancy among the ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tef1-α sequence dataset in reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was run using a heuristic search option of 1 000 search replicates with random-additions of sequences with a tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) algorithm. Maxtrees were set to 5 000, branches of zero length were collapsed and all equally parsimonious trees were saved. Other calculated parsimony scores were tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI) and rescaled consistency (RC). Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was performed with a GTR site substitution model, including a gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity and a proportion of invariant sites (Guindon et al. 2010). The branch support was evaluated with a bootstrapping (BS) method of 1 000 replicates (Hillis & Bull 1993).MrModeltest v. 2.3 was used to estimate the best nucleotide substitution model settings for each gene (Posada & Crandall 1998). Bayesian inference (BI) was performed based on the DNA dataset from the results of the MrModeltest, using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm in MrBayes v. 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003). Two MCMC chains were run from random trees for 1 000 M generations and stopped when average standard deviation of split frequencies fell below 0.01. Trees were saved each 1 000 generations. The first 25 % of trees were discarded as the burn-in phase of each analysis, and the posterior probabilities (BPP) were calculated from the remaining trees (Rannala & Yang 1996). Nakataea oryzae (CBS 243.76) and Pyricularia grisea (Ina168) were selected as outgroups in all analyses (Fan et al. 2016b). Phylograms were shown using FigTree v. 1.3.1 (Rambaut & Drummond 2010). Novel sequences generated in the current study were deposited in GenBank (Table 1) and the aligned matrices used for phylogenetic analyses in TreeBASE (www.treebase.org; accession number: S22175).
RESULTS
Molecular phylogenetic analyses
The alignment based on the sequence dataset (ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tef1-α) included 122 ingroup taxa, comprising 3 261 characters in the aligned matrix. Of these, 1 562 characters were constant, 184 variable characters were parsimony-uninformative and 1 515 characters were parsimony informative. The MP analysis resulted in 119 equally most parsimonious trees (TL = 8 082, CI = 0.385, RI = 0.761, RC = 0.293) and the first tree is shown in Fig. 1. For BI analyses, the general time reversible model, additionally assuming a proportion of invariant sites with gamma-distributed substitution rates of the remaining sites (GTR + I + G) was determined to be the best for the ITS, LSU and tef1-α loci by MrModeltest, while the most appropriate model for the rpb2 locus was the Tamura-Nei model, additionally assuming a proportion of invariant sites with gamma-distributed substitution rates of the remaining sites (TrN + I + G). The MP and ML bootstrap support values above 70 % are shown at the first and second position, respectively. Branches with significant Bayesian posterior probability (≥ 0.95) in Bayesian analyses were thickened in the phylogenetic tree. The phylogram based on four genes indicated 24 known lineages, representing 22 known families and two unknown taxa lacking typification studies, namely Diaporthella and Phaeoappendispora. Four new lineages belonging to the Diaporthales, distinct from all known taxa, are herein described as three new families and a new genus in Erythrogloeaceae (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Phylogram of Diaporthales resulting from MP analysis based on combined ITS, LSU, rpb2 and tef1-α. MP and ML bootstrap support values above 70 % are shown at the first and second position. Thickened branches represent posterior probabilities above 0.95 from BI. Type species are in bold. Strains obtained in the current study are in blue. — Scale bar = 200 changes.
Taxonomy
X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB823983Etymology. Name derived from the type genus, Diaporthostoma.Type genus. Diaporthostoma.Sexual morph: Pseudostromata immersed in host bark and slightly erumpent from host tissues. Ectostromatic
disc ovoid to ellipsoid, yellowish to dark grey. Central
column beneath the disc more or less conical. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conical, surrounding the ectostromatic disc. Ostioles single, dark grey to black. Paraphyses deliquescent. Asci 8-spored, with an apical ring. Ascospores hyaline, fusoid, bicellular. Asexual morph: not observed.Notes — The current phylogenetic analyses placed the new family Diaporthostomataceae in a highly supported clade (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1) closely related to Diaporthosporellaceae. Diaporthostomataceae is morphologically distinct from Diaporthosporellaceae (Yang et al. 2018) by discrete perithecia and fusoid, straight to curved ascospores with a median septum.X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB823984Etymology. Name derived from the morphological similarity with the genus Diaporthe.Type species. Diaporthostoma machili X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian.Sexual morph: Pseudostromata immersed in host bark, slightly erumpent from the bark surface. Ectostromatic
disc yellowish to dark grey, nearly flat, ovoid to ellipsoid. Central
column beneath the disc more or less conical. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conical, surrounding the ectostromatic disc, regularly scattered. Ostioles single, dark grey to black. Paraphyses deliquescent. Asci oblong to cylindrical-clavate, 8-spored, 2–3-seriate, with a more or less distinct apical ring. Ascospores hyaline, smooth, fusoid, multiguttulate, straight to curved, bicellular, with an inconspicuous median septum. Asexual morph: not observed.X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB823985; Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Morphology of Diaporthostoma machili from Machilus leptophylla. a, b. Habit of pseudostromata on branches; c. transverse section through pseudostroma; d. longitudinal section through pseudostroma; e, f. asci and ascospores; g. ascospores. — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b–d = 100 μm; e–g = 10 μm.
Etymology. Name derived from the host genus, Machilus.Sexual morph: Pseudostromata immersed in host bark, slightly erumpent, 400–700 μm diam. Ectostromatic
disc yellowish to dark grey, nearly flat, ovoid to ellipsoid, 120–140 μm diam. Central
column beneath the disc more or less conical. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conical, surrounding the ectostromatic disc, regularly scattered, 380–420 μm diam. Ostioles single, dark grey to black, 65–85 μm diam. Paraphyses deliquescent. Asci oblong to cylindrical-clavate, 8-spored, 2–3-seriate, with a more or less distinct apical ring, (26–)30–38(–40) × 6–8 μm (x̄ = 33.5 ± 1.5 × 7 ± 0.5 μm, n = 20). Ascospores hyaline, smooth, fusoid, multiguttulate, straight to slight curved, bicellular, with a median septum, not constricted at the septum, 11–14 × 2–2.5 (x̄ = 12 ± 1.1 × 2.3 ± 0.2 μm, n = 30) μm. Asexual morph: not observed.On PDA, cultures are initially white, becoming dark vinaceous after 3 wk. The colonies are flat with an irregular edge, producing white, sparse aerial mycelium; texture initially uniform, producing a dark brick-coloured circular ring on the margin after 3 d; sterile.Host & Distribution — On Machilus leptophylla in China.Materials examined (all on twigs and branches of Machilus leptophylla). China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Tianmu Mountain, N30°19′18.21″ E119°26′18.21″, 354 m asl, 20 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (holo-type CF 2017475; living ex-type culture CFCC 52100); Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Tianmu Mountain, N30°19′17.33″ E119°26′15.60″, 350 m asl, 20 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017479; living culture CFCC 52101).Notes — Diaporthostoma machili is the type species of Diaporthostoma, and is thus far only known to occur on Machilus leptophylla. Morphologically, it is characterised by the scattered, conical perithecia and fusoid, straight to curved ascospores with a median septum, which differs with other species in Diaporthales.Senan. et al., Stud. Mycol. 86: 258. 2017. emend.Type genus. Erythrogloeum Petr.Sexual morph: Pseudostromata small to large, erumpent, consisting of an inconspicuous ectostromatic disc generally with orange colour, semi-immersed to superficial, causing a more or less pustulate bark surface. Central column beneath the disc more or less conical. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia umber to fuscous black, covered with orange to umber pseudostromatic tissue, surrounding the ectostromatic disc, with small to long ostioles that emerge within the ectostromatic disc. Paraphyses deliquescent. Asci 8-spored, with an apical ring, grouped at the base with other asci, becoming detached from the perithecial wall. Ascospores hyaline, fusoid to cylindrical, bicellular. Asexual morph: foliicolous, associated with leaf spots. Conidiomata epiphyllous, subepidermal, sometimes eustromatic, acervular or subglobose, brown to black or yellow-orange, amphigenous, opening by irregular rupture, wall of 2–6 layers of orange-brown textura angularis, exuding slimy orange masses of conidia. Conidiophores hyaline to amber. Conidiogenous cells lining the inner cavity of conidioma, hyaline to olivaceous, smooth, subcylindrical to ampulliform, tapering to a long, thin neck, at times apical part elongated into a long neck, proliferating several times percurrently near apex, with flaring collarettes, or apex truncate, with minute periclinal thickening. Conidia hyaline to olivaceous, smooth, guttulate or not, thin-walled, ellipsoid, fusoid, ovoid to somewhat obclavate, straight to curved, apex subobtuse, obtusely rounded, base truncate, with prominent marginal frill, or dimorphic, intermixed in same conidiomata. Macroconidia broadly ellipsoid to obovoid, hyaline, smooth, granular to guttulate, thick-walled, apex obtuse, base flattened. Microconidia hyaline, smooth, guttulate, fusoid-ellipsoid, acutely rounded at apex, truncate at base (emended from Senanayake et al. 2017).Notes — The family Erythrogloeaceae was recently introduced by Senanayake et al. (2017) to accommodate Chrysocrypta, Disculoides and Erythrogloeum species having epiphyllous acervuli, and subcylindrical to ampulliform conidiogenous cells. These authors did not report any sexual morph associated with these genera. During our investigation, phylogenetic inferences using DNA sequences from some materials with a sexual morph placed these samples in a highly supported clade (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1) in the Erythrogloeaceae. The family Erythrogloeaceae is emended here to include the morphological features of the new sexual morphs observed during our study. These fungi have typical diaporthalean perithecia with clavateasci, and fusoid to cylindrical, bicellular ascospores.X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB823986Etymology. Name derived from pseudostromata emerging from woody host tissue.Type species. Dendrostoma mali X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian.Sexual morph: Pseudostromata small to large, distinct, circular, erumpent, consisting of an inconspicuous, usually orange ectostromatic disc, semi-immersed to superficial, causing a pustulate bark surface.
Ectostromatic disc flat or concave, orange, surrounded by bark flaps. Central column beneath the disc more or less conical. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conspicuous, umber to fuscous black, embedded in orange to umber pseudostromatic tissue, regularly scattered, surrounding the ectostromatic disc, with small to long ostioles that emerge within the ectostromatic disc. Ostioles flat in the disc or sometimes slightly projecting, cylindrical, sometimes obscuring the disc, covered by an orange, umber to fuscous black crust. Paraphyses deliquescent. Ascifusoid, 8-spored, 2–3-seriate, with an apical ring, becoming detached from the perithecial wall. Ascospores hyaline, fusoid to cylindrical, symmetrical to asymmetrical, straight to curved, bicellular, with a median septum, constricted at the septum, smooth, multiguttulate. Asexual morph: observed on PDA. Conidiomata pycnidial, hemispherical, somewhat erumpent, coated with aerial mycelium. Conidiophores hyaline to amber. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, polyphialidic, hyaline, verruculose, ampulliform to doliiform. Conidia hyaline, aseptate, ovoid to ellipsoid, or fusoid.Notes — The current phylogenetic analyses placed the new genus Dendrostoma in a highly supported clade (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1) closely related to other genera in Erythrogloeaceae (Senanayake et al. 2017). Dendrostoma is described based on the typical diaporthalean perithecia with clavateasci and fusoid to cylindrical, bicellular ascospores. This study describes one genus and four species from China, and the host association appears to provide an important character for reliable identification. However, further collections are needed to confirm the host ranges and geographical distributions.X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB823987; Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Morphology of Dendrostoma mali from Malus spectabilis. a–c. Habit of pseudostromata on branches; d. transverse section of perithecia; e. longitudinal section through perithecia; f–i. asci and ascospores; j, k. ascospores; l, m. conidiomata on PDA; n. conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; o. conidia. — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b–e, l, m = 500 μm; f–k, n, o = 10 μm.
Etymology. Name derived from the host genus, Malus.Pseudostromata erumpent, consisting of an inconspicuous orange ectostromatic disc, semi-immersed to superficial, causing a pustulate bark surface, 1300–2100 μm diam.
Ectostromatic disc flat or concave, orange, or brown to black, sometimes concealed by ostioles, surrounded by bark flaps, 350–800 μm diam. Central column yellowish to brownish. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conspicuous, umber to fuscous black, regularly scattered, surrounding the ectostromatic disc, 300–500 μm diam. Ostioles 2–6 per disc, flat in the disc or sometimes slightly projecting, cylindrical, covered by an orange, umber to fuscous black crust, 70–100 μm diam. Paraphyses deliquescent. Ascifusoid, 8-spored, biseriate, with an apical ring, 40–60(–65) × 7–10(–11) μm (x̄ = 47 ± 5.3 × 8.5 ± 1.1 μm, n = 10). Ascospores hyaline, fusoid to cylindrical, smooth, multiguttulate, often containing two guttules per cell, symmetrical to asymmetrical, straight to slightly curved, bicellular, with a median septum distinctly constricted, 12–14 × 3–4 μm (x̄ = 13 ± 1 × 3.4 ± 0.3 μm, n = 30). Conidiomata pycnidial, hemispherical, somewhat erumpent, coated with white aerial mycelium, 1200–2500 μm, conidial masses extruding from the ostioles. Conidiophores hyaline, occasionally amber at the base, aseptate. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, polyphialidic, with 1–2 integrated loci, hyaline, verruculose, ampulliform to doliiform. Conidia hyaline, aseptate, ovoid to ellipsoid, apex obtuse, 3–4.5 × 2–2.5 μm (x̄ = 3.6 ± 0.5 × 2.2 ± 0.2 μm, n = 30).On PDA, cultures are white. Colonies are flat with regular edge; texture initially uniform, producing concentric circles after 3 wk with sparse conidiomata irregularly distributed on the agar surface.Host & Distribution — On Malus spectabilis in China.Material examined. China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Tianmu Mountain, N30°19′02.62″ E119°26′34.33″, 320 m asl, on twigs and branches of Malus spectabilis, 21 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (holotype CF 2017445; living ex-type culture CFCC 52102).Notes — Dendrostoma mali is the type species of Dendrostoma, and presently is only known on Malus spectabilis. It can be distinguished from other known Dendrostoma spp. by the fusoid to cylindrical ascospores, and the ovoid to ellipsoid conidia with obtuse apices. Dendrostoma mali is assumed to be host specific which needs to be confirmed by additional studies.X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB823989; Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Morphology of Dendrostoma quercina from Quercus acutissima. a, b. Habit of pseudostromata on branches; c. transverse section of pseudostroma; d. longitudinal section through pseudostroma; e–g. asci and ascospores; h, i. ascospores; j, k. conidiomata on PDA; l. conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; m. conidia. — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b–d, j, k = 500 μm; e–i, l, m = 10 μm.
Etymology. Name derived from the host genus, Quercus.Pseudostromata erumpent, consisting of an inconspicuous orange ectostromatic disc, semi-immersed to erumpent, causing a pustulate bark surface, 800–1500 μm diam.
Ectostromatic disc flat or concave, orange, or brown to black, sometimes concealed by ostioles, surrounded by bark flaps, 500–1100 μm diam. Central column yellowish to brownish. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conspicuous, umber to fuscous black, regularly scattered, surrounding the ectostromatic disc, 250–500 μm. Ostioles 3–8 per disc, flat in disc or sometimes slightly projecting, cylindrical, covered by an orange, umber to fuscous black crust, 100–150 μm diam. Paraphyses deliquescent. Ascifusoid, 8-spored, 2–3-seriate, with an apical ring, 53–70 × 9.5–10 μm (x̄ = 60.5 ± 4 × 9.8 ± 0.3 μm, n = 10). Ascospores hyaline, fusoid to cylindrical, smooth, multi-guttulate, often containing two guttules per cell, symmetrical to asymmetrical, straight to slightly curved, bicellular, with a median septum distinctly constricted, 16–22(–24) × 3–4 μm (x̄ = 20 ± 1.7 × 3.5 ± 0.4 μm, n = 30). Conidiomata pycnidial, hemispherical, somewhat erumpent, covered with cinnamon aerial mycelium, 900–2200 μm diam; conidial masses extruding from ostioles. Conidiophores hyaline, occasionally amber at the base, aseptate. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, polyphialidic, with 1–2 integrated loci, hyaline, verruculose, ampulliform to doliiform. Conidia hyaline, aseptate, fusoid, acute at each end, 10.5–14 × 2.5(–3) μm (x̄ = 12 ± 1 × 2.5 ± 0.2 μm, n = 30).On PDA, cultures are white, becoming hazel in the centre after 2 wk. The colonies are flat with regular edge; texture initially uniform, becoming dense in the centre after 2 wk, producing circular conidiomata at the margin of the compact centre.Host & Distribution — On Quercus acutissima in China.Materials examined (all on twigs and branches of Quercus acutissima). China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Hangzhou Botanical Garden, N30°15′13.25″ E120°06′56.33″, 49 m asl, 17 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (holotype CF 2017461; living ex-type culture CFCC 52103); Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Hangzhou Botanical Garden, N30°15′12.52″, E120°06′57.02″, 50 m asl, 17 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017462; living culture CFCC 52104); Hangzhou City, Hangzhou Botanical Garden, N30°15′13.77″ E120°06′59.93″, 46 m asl, 17 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017470; living culture CFCC 52105).Notes — Dendrostoma quercinum can be distinguished from D. mali and D. osmanthi by its larger ascospores (16–24 × 3–4 μm), and DNA sequence data.X.L. Fan & C.M. Tian, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB823990; Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Morphology of Dendrostoma osmanthi from Osmanthus fragrans. a, b. Habit of pseudostromata on branches; c. transverse section of pseudostroma; d. longitudinal section through pseudostroma; e–g. asci and ascospores; h. ascospores; i. conidiomata on PDA; j. conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; k. conidia. — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b–d, i = 500 μm; e–h, j, k = 10 μm.
Etymology. Name derived from the host genus, Osmanthus.Pseudostromata erumpent, consisting of an inconspicuous orange ectostromatic disc, semi-immersed to superficial, causing a pustulate bark surface, 1200–1400 μm diam.
Ectostromatic disc flat or concave, orange, brown to black, sometimes concealed by ostioles, surrounded by bark flaps, 500–1100 μm diam. Central column yellowish to brownish. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia conspicuous, umber to fuscous black, regularly scattered, surrounding the ectostromatic disc, 300–400 μm diam. Ostioles 4–16 per disc, flat in the disc or sometimes slightly projecting, cylindrical, covered by an orange, umber to fuscous black crust, 80–130 μm diam. Paraphyses deliquescent. Ascifusoid, 8-spored, biseriate, with an apical ring, 55–65 × 7.5–9.5(–10) μm (x̄ = 59 ± 2.1 × 8.7 ± 0.7 μm, n = 10). Ascospores hyaline, fusoid to cylindrical, smooth, often containing two guttules per cell to multiguttulate, symmetrical to asymmetrical, straight to slightly curved, bicellular, with a median septum distinctly constricted, 11.5–14.5 × 3.5–4 μm (x̄ = 13 ± 1.2 × 3.7 ± 0.2 μm, n = 30). Conidiomata pycnidial, hemispherical, somewhat erumpent, coated with cinnamon aerial mycelium, 900–2200 μm diam, with translucent conidial droplets emerging from ostioles. Conidiophores hyaline, aseptate. Conidiogenous cells enteroblastic, polyphialidic, with 1–2 integrated loci, hyaline, ampulliform to doliiform. Conidia hyaline, aseptate, fusoid, acute at each end, 7.5–10.5(–12) × 2–2.5 μm (x̄ = 9.5 ± 1.2 × 2.3 ± 0.2 μm, n = 30).On PDA, cultures are white, becoming slight isabelline after 2 wk. The colonies are flat with irregular edge; texture initially uniform, producing concentric circles after 2 wk with sparse conidiomata irregularly distributed on the agar surface.Host & Distribution — On Osmanthus fragrans in China.Materials examined (all on twigs and branches of Osmanthus fragrans). China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Xijing Mountain, N30°17′00.77″ E119°43′28.70″, 139 m asl, 23 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (holo-type CF 2017473; living ex-type culture CFCC 52106); Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Xijing Mountain, N33°17′00.35″ E119°43′26.70″, 154 m asl, 23 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017476; living culture CFCC 52108); Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Xijing Mountain, N30°17′30.67″ E119°43′20.30″, 139 m asl, 23 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017474; living culture CFCC 52107); Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Xijing Mountain, N33°17′32.33″ E119°43′22.15″, 154 m asl, 23 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017477; living culture CFCC 52109).Notes — The bark surface of Osmanthus fragrans is pustulate, with the fungus appearing to be pathogenic to this host. Dendrostoma osmanthi is similar to D. mali but differs by having fusoid to cylindrical ascospores that are distinctly constricted at the median septum. The phylogenetic inferences indicated this species as an individual well-supported clade (MP/ML/BI = 100/99/1) in the genus Dendrostoma.C.M. Tian & X.L. Fan, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB823991Etymology. Name derived from the type genus, Pseudomelanconis.Type genus. Pseudomelanconis C.M. Tian & X.L. Fan.Asexual morph: melanconium-like. Conidiomata in bark, acervular, with an inconspicuous ectostromatic disc causing a more or less pustulate bark surface. Central column beneath the disc more or less conical and becoming pale brown or olive at maturity. The marginal part of ectostroma comprises conidiophores and their basal cell layers. Conidiophores aseptate, unbranched, cylindrical, hyaline to pale brown, smooth-walled. Conidiogenous cells annellidic. Conidia ellipsoid to elongate pyriform, brown at maturity with hyaline sheath. Sexual morph: not observed.Notes — The asexual morph of the new family Pseudomelanconidaceae is similar to members of Melanconiellaceae, Melanconidaceae and Juglanconidaceae (Fan et al. 2016b, Voglmayr et al. 2017), but differs mainly by having conidiogenous cells with discreet annellations and an inconspicuous hyaline conidial sheath when mature. The phylogenetic inferences resolved this family as an individual group with well-supported value (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1) from other families of Diaporthales.C.M. Tian & X.L. Fan, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB823992Etymology. Name derived from pseudo- (false-, in Greek) and the genus name Melanconis.Type species. Pseudomelanconis caryae C.M. Tian & X.L. Fan.Asexual morph: melanconium-like. Conidiomata in bark, acervular, immersed in host bark to erumpent. Ectostromatic disc inconspicuous, causing a more or less pustulate bark surface. Central column beneath the disc more or less conical. The marginal part of the central column comprises conidiophores and their basal cell layers. Conidiophores unbranched, aseptate, cylindrical, hyaline to pale brown, smooth-walled, sometimes reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells annellidic, sometimes with apical collarette. Conidia hyaline when immature, becoming brown at maturity, ellipsoid to oblong, aseptate, multiguttulate, with distinct hyaline sheath, becoming inconspicuous when mature. Conidial wall smooth on the outer surface, with inconspicuous to distinct, sometimes confluent irregular verrucae on the inner surface. Sexual morph: not observed.C.M. Tian & X.L. Fan, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB823993; Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Morphology of Pseudomelanconis caryae from Carya cathayensis. a, b. Habit of conidiomata on branches; c. transverse section of conidioma; d. longitudinal section through conidioma; e–g. conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; h. conidia. — Scale bars: a = 1 mm; b–d = 500 μm; e–h = 10 μm.
Etymology. Named after the host genus from which it was isolated, Carya.Asexual morph: melanconium-like. Conidiomata acervular, 500–800 μm diam, immersed in host bark to erumpent, covered by brown to blackish exuding conidial masses at maturity. Central column beneath the disc more or less conical. Conidiophores unbranched, aseptate, cylindrical, hyaline to pale brown, smooth-walled, 14–30 μm. Conidiogenous cells annellidic, occasionally with distinct annellations and collarettes. Conidia hyaline when immature, becoming greyish sepia to olivaceous, ellipsoid to oblong, multiguttulate, aseptate, (12.5–)13–15(–16) × 4–5 μm (x̄ = 14 ± 1.1 × 4.5 ± 0.3 μm, n = 30), with distinct hyaline sheath, 0.5–1 μm diam, becoming inconspicuous when mature. Conidial wall smooth on the outer surface. Sexual morph: not observed.On PDA, cultures are initially white, becoming grey olivaceous. The colonies are flat, with irregular margins; texture initially uniform, becoming compact in centre after 3 wk. Conidiomata sparse, producing black conidial droplets, irregularly distributed over the agar surface.Host & Distribution — On Carya cathayensis in China.Materials examined (all on twigs and branches of Carya cathayensis). China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Tianmu Mountain, N30°18′48.85″ E119°26′36.99″, 288 m asl, 21 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (holotype CF 2017466; living ex-type culture CFCC 52110); Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Tianmu Mountain, N30°18′49.19″ E119°26′37.24″, 281 m asl, 21 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017467; living culture CFCC 52111); Hangzhou City, Linan, Tianmu Mountain, N30°18′48.77″ E119°26′36.56″, 287 m asl, 21 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017468; living culture CFCC 52112); Hangzhou City, Linan, Tianmu Mountain, N30°18′49.14″ E119°26′30.44″, 285 m asl, 21 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017469; living culture CFCC 52113).Notes — Pseudomelanconis caryae is the type species of Pseudomelanconis, and only occurs on Carya cathayensis in China. Isolates were identified as P. caryae based on their characteristic morphology, host, and DNA phylogeny (MP/ML/BI = 100/100/1). Juglanconis oblonga is similar to P. caryae, but it can be distinguished by larger brown to blackish conidia (18–22.7 × 9.2–12), and distinctly integrated annellations, as well as DNA sequence data (Voglmayr et al. 2017). Melanconis juglandis var. caryae was recorded from Carya cathayensis, which was considered as a distinct species by Wehmeyer (1941). However, it differs from P. caryae primarily by hyaline alpha (10.5–14 × 5–7 μm) and beta conidia (2–2.5 × 0.8–1 μm; Wehmeyer 1941). Wehmeyer (1937) also transferred Melanconiella pallida from Carya spp. to Melanconis, which differs from P. caryae in dark brown, subspherical to ovoid or oblong-cylindrical conidia (18–26.5 × 13.3–16.5 μm). Although Pseudomelanconis has acervular conidiomata covered by a pustulate conidial mass on the bark surface similar to Melanconis and Juglanconis, DNA sequence data confirmed them to represent a distinct phylogenetic lineage. Results of recent molecular phylogenetic investigations revealed a remarkably high diversity of corticolous melanconium-like fungi in Diaporthales (Fan et al. 2016b, Voglmayr et al. 2012, 2017).X.L. Fan & J.D.P. Bezerra, fam. nov. — MycoBank MB823994Etymology. Name derived from the type genus, Synnemasporella.Type genus. Synnemasporella X.L. Fan & J.D.P. Bezerra.Pseudostromata appearing upon the bark surface as pustules containing small groups of a few ostioles emergent through the adherent periderm, covered by a whitish pulverulence. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia spherical or flattened, with long necks, thickly clustered beneath the ectostromatic disks. Asci clavate. Ascospores biseriate, fusoid-ellipsoid, two-celled, hyaline, usually with a short, hyaline, bristle-like appendage at each end. Conidiomata synnematal or pycnidial. Synnemata determinate, parallel, consisting of slender, cylindrical black stalks and a spherical, capitate, shiny black mass of conidia which was cut off from the ends of the numerous entwined hyphae of the stalk; conidiogenous cells zone concave. Pycnidia with a central circular ostiole, hemispherical, immersed, somewhat erumpent. Conidiophores aggregated, straight to curved. Conidiogenous
cells aggregated, hyaline, straight to curved, cylindrical. Conidia cylindrical to clavate, with a discrete hilum, smooth, pale brown.Notes — The new family Synnemasporellaceae is proposed to accommodate fungi without the typical characters of any of the two-celled, hyaline-spored, stromatic genera. Also, the synnematal and pycnidial conidiomata differ widely from melanconium-like fungi, having pale brown conidia with a distinct hilum (Wehmeyer 1933). The phylogenetic inferences resolved this family as a well-supported clade (MP/ML/BI = 98/98/1) between the families Juglanconidaceae and Apiosporopsidaceae. Members of the new family differ from Juglanconidaceae and Apiosporopsidaceae (Senanayake et al. 2017, Voglmayr et al. 2017) mainly in the type of the host plant association, disease symptoms, ascomatal and/or conidiomatal characters, shape of ascospores, conidiogenous cells and conidia, and distinct synnemata.X.L. Fan & J.D.P. Bezerra, gen. nov. — MycoBank MB823995Etymology. Name derived from the synnematous conidiomata.Type species. Synnemasporella toxicodendri X.L. Fan & J.D.P. Bezerra.Sexual morph (based on Wehmeyer 1933): Pseudostromata appearing upon the surface as pustules containing small groups of a few ostioles emergent through the adherent periderm, or as larger dense fascicles of elongate-cylindrical ostioles, erumpent through a whitish pulverulent disk. Ectostromatic disc often obliterated by the erumpent ostioles, many of which are covered by a whitish pulverulence. Perithecia spherical or somewhat flattened, with long slender necks, thickly clustered beneath the ectostromatic disks. Asci clavate. Ascospores biseriate, long fusoid-ellipsoid, two-celled, hyaline, constricted at the septum, usually with a short, hyaline, bristle-like appendage at each end. Asexual morph: Conidiomata synnematal or pycnidial. Synnemata long and determinate, erumpent, growing from the host tissue, pale brown, straight to curved, parallel, conidiogenous cells zone concave and dark, with some host tissue at the base of synnema. Pycnidia with a central circular ostiole, hemispherical, immersed, somewhat erumpent. Conidiophores aggregated, aseptate, straight to curved. Conidiogenous
cells aggregated, hyaline, straight to curved, cylindrical, arranged alongside one another, each producing one conidium. Conidia cylindrical to oblong-cylindrical, with a discrete hilum, smooth, multiguttulate, pale brown.(Schwein.) X.L. Fan & J.D.P. Bezerra, comb. nov. — MycoBank MB823996; Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Morphology of Synnemasporella aculeans from Rhus chinensis. a–c. Habit of synnemata on branches; d, e. longitudinal section through synnema; f, m, n. conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; g, h, o. conidia; i, j. habit of pycnidia on branches; k. transverse section of pycnidium; l. longitudinal section through pycnidium. — Scale bars: a–c = 1 mm; d, j–l = 500 μm; e = 100 μm; f–h, m–o = 10 μm; i = 5 mm.
Basionym. Sphaeria aculeans Schwein., Trans. Amer. Philos. Soc. 4: 204. 1832.Synonym. Cryptodiaporthe aculeans (Schwein.) Wehm., Monogr. Gen. Diaporthe Nitschke & Segreg., Univ. Michigan Stud., Sci. Ser. 9: 212. 1933.Sexual morph (based on Wehmeyer 1933): Pseudostromata appearing upon the surface as pustules containing small groups of a few ostioles emergent through the adherent periderm, or as larger dense fascicles of elongate-cylindrical ostioles, erumpent through a whitish pulverulent disk, 0.3–1 mm diam, covered by a whitish pulverulence. Stromatic zones lacking. Perithecia spherical or flattened, with long slender necks, thickly clustered beneath the ectostromatic disks, 260–480 × 250–400 μm. Asci clavate, 47–65 × 5–8 μm. Ascospores biseriate, long fusoid-ellipsoid, two-celled, hyaline, constricted at the septum, 12–18 × 2.5–3 μm, and usually with a short, hyaline, bristle-like appendage at each end, 2–2.5 μm length. Asexual morph: Conidiomata synnematal or pycnidial. Synnemata long and determinated, growing from the host tissue, pale to brown, straight to curved, parallel, with convex and dark conidiogenous cells zone, and some host tissue at the base of synnema, 1100–1500 μm high, 200–400 μm diam. Conidiophores aggregated, aseptate, straight to curved, 20–30 μm. Conidiogenous
cells aggregated, hyaline, straight to curved, cylindrical, arranged alongside one another at the end of the synnemata, each producing one conidium. Conidia oblong-cylindrical, with a distinct hilum, smooth, multiguttulate, hyaline when young and becoming pale brown at maturity, 8–10(–11) × 3–3.5 μm (x̄ = 9.3 ± 0.9 × 3.2 ± 0.3 μm, n = 30). Pycnidia with a central circular ostiole, hemispherical, immersed, somewhat erumpent, containing an irregular one-chambered locule with black conidial mass, 700–1000 μm. Conidiophores aggregated, aseptate, straight to curved, 20–35 μm. Conidiogenous
cells aggregated, hyaline, straight to curved, cylindrical, arranged alongside one another at the base of the pycnidia, each producing one conidium. Conidia ovoid to oblong-fusoid, one-celled, hyaline, multiguttulate, (6.5–)7–8.5(–9) × 2.5–3(–3.5) μm (x̄ = 7.6 ± 0.6 × 3 ± 0.3 μm, n = 30).On PDA, cultures are initially white, becoming straw on the margin after 3 wk. The colonies are felty with regular edge; texture initially uniform, producing concentric circle on the margin after 3 d; sterile.Host & Distribution — On Rhus copallina, R. diversiloba, R. glabra, R. javanica, R. typhina and R. vernix in Japan and USA (Wehmeyer 1933, Kobayashi 1970, Mejía et al. 2011), and on R. chinensis in China.Materials examined (all on twigs and branches of Rhus chinensis). China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Xijing Mountain, N30°15′32.83″ E119°43′30.73″, 47 m asl, 22 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017464; living culture CFCC 52094); Jiangxi Province, Dexing City, Phoenix Lake, N28°56′15.20″ E117°35′32.12″, 40 m asl, 8 Apr. 2017, B. Cao (CF 2017401; living culture CFCC 52096); Jiangxi Province, Dexing City, Phoenix Lake, N28°56′14.11″ E117°35′32.84″, 41 m asl, 8 Apr. 2017, B. Cao (CF 2017400; living culture CFCC 52095).Notes — Synnemasporella aculeans is proposed as a new combination in the new genus Synnemasporella based on the description of Cryptodiaporthe aculeans, which was introduced producing perithecial ascomata, and an asexual morph producing sporodochial and/or pycnidial conidiomata (Wehmeyer 1933). Wehmeyer (1933) placed C. aculeans provisionally in Cryptodiaporthe and suggested this genus as a ‘heterogeneous group of species which will probably be segregated into several genera when the relationships of its species are better known’, highlighting that C. aculeans could be proposed as a new genus based on its atypical morphological features (see notes of Synnemasporellaceae). Sogonov et al. (2008) treated Cryptodiaporthe (type C. aesculi) as a synonym of Plagiostoma, which was followed by Mejía et al. (2011) and Voglmayr et al. (2017). Recently, Senanayake et al. (2017) separated the genera Plagiostoma and Cryptodiaporthe in their phylogenetically inferences, and pointed out that Gnomoniaceae comprised 24 genera, including Plagiostoma and Cryptodiaporthe. In the current study, the phylogram indicated that our isolates clustered into the same clade (MP/ML/BI = 80/100/1) with the only available culture of C. aculeans (AR3878). Based on the phylogenetic inferences and morphological features, we transferred C. aculeans to the new genus Synnemasporella, as a new combination S. aculeans. Synnemasporella aculeans is similar to S. toxicodendri, but differs from it in having shorter synnemata (1100–1500 μm vs 1200–1800 μm), a convex conidiogenous cells zone on top of synnemata, and larger, oblong-cylindrical conidia (8–11 × 3–3.5 μm).This species also represents two types of conidiomata in Diaporthales, namely pycnidia and synnemata. This uncommon phenomenon was also recorded by Wehmeyer (1933), who observed the production of sporodochia on twigs of Rhus. Wehmeyer (1933) also reported the production of conidiomata when cultures were grown on agar, ‘showing all intergradations between true pycnidia and true sporodochia’.X.L. Fan & J.D.P. Bezerra, sp. nov. — MycoBank MB823997; Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Morphology of Synnemasporella toxicodendri from Toxicodendron sylvestre. a, b. Habit of synnemata on branches; c, d. longitudinal section through synnema; e. conidiophores and conidiogenous cells; f, g. conidia. — Scale bars: a, b = 1 mm; c, d = 100 μm; e–g = 10 μm.
Etymology. Name derived from the host genus, Toxicodendron.Conidiomata synnematal. Synnemata long and determinate, growing from host tissue, pale to brown, straight to curved, parallel, with flat to slightly concave and dark conidiogenous cells zone and some host tissue at the base of synnema, 1200–1800 μm high, 150–300 μm diam. Conidiophores aggregated, aseptate, straight to curved, reduced to conidiogenous cells, 20–30 μm. Conidiogenous
cells aggregated, hyaline, straight to curved, cylindrical, arranged adjacent to one another at the end of the synnema, producing one conidium each. Conidia cylindrical to oblong-cylindrical, with a discrete hilum, smooth, multiguttulate, pale brown, 6–8 × 2.5–4 μm (x̄ = 7.3 ± 0.6 × 3.1 ± 0.3 μm, n = 30). Sexual morph: not observed.On PDA, cultures are initially white, becoming sepia on the bottom after 3 d. The colonies are felty with an irregular edge; texture initially uniform, producing concentric circles after 3 wk; sterile.Host & Distribution — From Toxicodendron sylvestre in China.Materials examined (all on twigs and branches of Toxicodendron sylvestre). China, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Xijing Mountain, N30°15′32.84″ E119°43′31.21″, 54 m asl, 22 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (holotype CF 2017481; living ex-type culture CFCC 52097); Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Xijing Mountain, N30°15′32.21″ E119°43′31.55″, 51 m asl, 22 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017483; living culture CFCC 52099); Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou City, Linan, Xijing Mountain, N30°15′31.12″ E119°43′30.77″, 52 m asl, 22 Apr. 2017, Q. Yang & Z. Du (CF 2017482; living culture CFCC 52098).Notes — Structures of S. toxicodendri were observed growing on diseased wood of Toxicodendron sylvestre in China, and so far, only occurs on T. sylvestre. Morphologically, it can be distinguished from S. aculeans and other genera in Diaporthales because it is characterised by the higher synnemata (1200–1800 μm) growing from the host tissue, with flat to slightly concave and dark conidiogenous cells zone on the top. The sexual morph of this species is not known and further collections are required to resolve its life cycle.
DISCUSSION
In this study we propose three new families, namely Diaporthostomataceae, Pseudomelanconidaceae, Synnemasporellaceae, and a new genus, Dendrostoma (Erythrogloeaceae), including three new species. The new materials studied here were collected in Zhejiang Province, China. This province was chiefly selected due to Tianmu Mountain, which is considered as a biodiversity hotspot with a high diversity for forest species (Zhou 1995). In the current study, all specimens were collected from symptomatic branches and twigs associated with canker or dieback disease of Anacardiaceae (Rhus chinensis, Toxicodendron sylvestre), Fagaceae (Quercus acutissima), Juglandaceae (Carya cathayensis), Lauraceae (Machilus leptophylla), Oleaceae (Osmanthus fragrans) and Rosaceae (Malus spectabilis), suggesting that many additional undiscovered species of diaporthalean fungi exist in China.The classification of Diaporthales presented here integrates results from prior analyses (Castlebury et al. 2002, Rossman et al. 2007) and discoveries of new taxa from many other research groups (Cheewangkoon et al. 2010, Crous et al. 2012, 2015, Suetrong et al. 2015, Norphanphoun et al. 2016, Senanayake et al. 2017, Voglmayr et al. 2017). Diaporthales are mostly characterised by diaporthalean perithecia with an elongate beak and unitunicate asci with a characteristic refractive apical annulus when mature (Rossman et al. 2007). However, these characters are difficult to fully study in vivo due to the absence of various morphological morphs. As a result, the family concepts have thus been unstable, with many species being transferred from one genus or family to another (Rossman et al. 2007, Hongsanan et al. 2017, Senanayake et al. 2017). Based on newly generated molecular data, the current systematic framework provides good support for this order and related families (Castlebury et al. 2002, Rossman et al. 2007, Crous et al. 2015, Senanayake et al. 2017, Voglmayr et al. 2017). The current study revised the Diaporthales and accepted 25 families in the order (Table 2). However, some nodes remain weakly supported, and genera such as Diaporthella and Phaeoappendispora require further collection and study (Senanayake et al. 2017).
Table 2
Placement of families in Diaporthales by different authors.
Nannfeldt (1932)
Von Arx & Müller (1954)
Wehmeyer & Hanlin (1975)
Barr (1978)
Rossman et al. (2007)
Senanayake et al. (2017)
This paper (2018)
Diaportheaceae
Diaportheaceae
Diaportheaceae
Diaportheaceae
Cryphonectriaceae
Apiosporopsidaceae
Apiosporopsidaceae
Valsaceae
Gnomoniaceae
Gnomoniaceae
Diaportheaceae
Apoharknessiaceae
Apoharknessiaceae
Valsaceae
Melanconidaceae
Gnomoniaceae
Asterosporiaceae
Asterosporiaceae
Valsaceae
Melanconidaceae
Auratiopycnidiellaceae
Auratiopycnidiellaceae
Pseudovalsaceae
Coryneaceae
Coryneaceae
Schizoparmeaceae
Cryphonectriaceae
Cryphonectriaceae
Sydowiellaceae
Cytosporaceae
Cytosporaceae
Togniniaceae
Diaporthaceae
Diaporthaceae
Valsaceae
Erythrogloeaceae
Diaporthosporellaceae
Gnomoniaceae
Diaporthostomataceae
Harknessiaceae
Erythrogloeaceae
Juglanconidaceae
Gnomoniaceae
Lamproconiaceae
Harknessiaceae
Macrohilaceae
Juglanconidaceae
Melanconidaceae
Lamproconiaceae
Melanconiellaceae
Macrohilaceae
Prosopidicolaceae
Melanconidaceae
Pseudoplagiostomataceae
Melanconiellaceae
Schizoparmeaceae
Prosopidicolaceae
Stilbosporaceae
Pseudomelanconidaceae
Sydowiellaceae
Pseudoplagiostomataceae
Schizoparmeaceae
Stilbosporaceae
Sydowiellaceae
Synnemasporellaceae
As the morphological features in Diaporthales are highly diverse, phylogenetic studies have been useful to elucidate the diversity in this group, and the inclusion or exclusion of taxa in this order. In this study we proposed a new genus in Erythrogloeaceae, namely Dendrostoma, which is characterised by typical diaporthalean perithecia with clavateasci, and fusoid to cylindrical, bicellular ascospores. The family Erythrogloeaceae was recently proposed by Senanayake et al. (2017) to accommodate Chrysocrypta, Disculoides and Erythrogloeum based on morphological features and phylogenetic analyses. Members of this family are mainly characterised by acervular conidiomata, hyaline to olivaceous conidia, and the presence of macro- and microconidia. Although Senanayake et al. (2017) did not observe any sexual morph in this family, we did collect a sexual morph in the present study, and thus emended the family description accordingly.The new family Diaporthostomataceae is introduced here based on phylogenetic inferences and morphology of its members, which are mainly characterised by conical and discrete perithecia, and bicellular, fusoid ascospores. The new family is morphologically distinct from its sister family Diaporthosporellaceae, which is also distinguished from other diaporthalean families by irregularly uniseriate, allantoid or subreniform ascospores, phialidic conidiophores, and cylindrical to ellipsoidal, aseptate conidia (Yang et al. 2018). Members of Diaporthosporellaceae are known from twigs and branches of Cercis chinensis (Yang et al. 2018), and representatives of Diaporthostomataceae occur on Machilus leptophylla, both occurring in China.Pseudomelanconidaceae is described here (on Carya cathayensis in China) based on phylogenetic inferences, and on few morphological features which distinguish it from members of Melanconium-related Melanconiellaceae, Melanconidaceae and Juglanconidaceae. Senanayake et al. (2017) introduced Melanconiellaceae to accommodate the previous unresolved Melanconiella clade in Diaporthales. Melanconiella species were previously observed to be highly host-specific to the host family Betulaceae, and confined to the north temperate zone, namely Europe and North America (Voglmayr et al. 2012). Du et al. (2017) extended the host and geographic range to include Cornus controversa and Juglans regia in China. The Melanconidaceae was recently revised by Senanayake et al. (2017), and included a single genus, Melanconis, which is characterised by perithecial ascomata having 8-spored asci, hyaline, ellipsoid, 1-septate ascospores, and acervular conidiomata with hyaline to brown, ellipsoid or subglobose conidia. Members of this family include saprobic and plant pathogenic species in North America and Europe (Senanayake et al. 2017). Juglanconidaceae was introduced by Voglmayr et al. (2017) and it comprises a single genus, Juglanconis, which occurs on dead, corticated twigs and branches of Juglandaceae species. Morphologically, members of this family have perithecial ascomata, octosporous asci with an apical ring, hyaline, bicellular ascospores with or without gelatinous appendages, and acervular conidiomata with brown conidia with gelatinous sheaths (Senanayake et al. 2017, Voglmayr et al. 2017).The molecular phylogenetic analyses also revealed another well-supported family, Synnemasporellaceae, which is closely related to Juglanconidaceae (Fig. 1). We identified one species of this clade as Cryptodiaporthe aculeans based on the ambiguous asexual features of this species, which can produce synnemata and pycnidia. Interestingly, C. aculeans was ‘arbitrarily placed in the genus Cryptodiaporthe’ by Wehmeyer (1933), who also suggested that this species could be described as a new genus ‘since it does not show the typical characters of any of the two-celled, hyaline-spored, stromata genera’. Recent studies, however, did not include Cryptodiaporthe aculeans in their phylogenetic analyses (Sogonov et al. 2008, Mejía et al. 2011, Senanayake et al. 2017). In the present study, this fungus was transferred to Synnemasporella as a new combination, based on the original description of Wehmeyer (1933), and the only sequenced culture (AR3878) available in GenBank. Synnemasporellaceae comprises fungi distinguished by the presence of spherical or flattened perithecia with long necks, clavateasci, fusoid-ellipsoid, two-celled, hyaline ascospores, usually with a short, hyaline, bristle-like appendage at each end, and synnematal and/or pycnidial conidiomata producing cylindrical to clavate, smooth, pale brown conidia.As shown in this study, future studies addressing the family-level organization of the Diaporthales should routinely include data for protein-coding genes, especially rpb2 and tef1-α. It is hoped that the classification proposed here will also provide an updated phylogenetic framework that will facilitate further revision of the Diaporthales.
Authors: Conrad L Schoch; Keith A Seifert; Sabine Huhndorf; Vincent Robert; John L Spouge; C André Levesque; Wen Chen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-03-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Q Chen; M Bakhshi; Y Balci; K D Broders; R Cheewangkoon; S F Chen; X L Fan; D Gramaje; F Halleen; M Horta Jung; N Jiang; T Jung; T Májek; S Marincowitz; I Milenković; L Mostert; C Nakashima; I Nurul Faziha; M Pan; M Raza; B Scanu; C F J Spies; L Suhaizan; H Suzuki; C M Tian; M Tomšovský; J R Úrbez-Torres; W Wang; B D Wingfield; M J Wingfield; Q Yang; X Yang; R Zare; P Zhao; J Z Groenewald; L Cai; P W Crous Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 25.731