Literature DB >> 30504364

Strategies for Efficient Genome Editing Using CRISPR-Cas9.

Behnom Farboud1, Aaron F Severson2,3,4, Barbara J Meyer5.   

Abstract

The targetable DNA endonuclease CRISPR-Cas9 has transformed analysis of biological processes by enabling robust genome editing in model and nonmodel organisms. Although rules directing Cas9 to its target DNA via a guide RNA are straightforward, wide variation occurs in editing efficiency and repair outcomes for both imprecise error-prone repair and precise templated repair. We found that imprecise and precise DNA repair from double-strand breaks (DSBs) is asymmetric, favoring repair in one direction. Using this knowledge, we designed RNA guides and repair templates that increased the frequency of imprecise insertions and deletions and greatly enhanced precise insertion of point mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans We also devised strategies to insert long (10 kb) exogenous sequences and incorporate multiple nucleotide substitutions at a considerable distance from DSBs. We expanded the repertoire of co-conversion markers appropriate for diverse nematode species. These selectable markers enable rapid identification of Cas9-edited animals also likely to carry edits in desired targets. Lastly, we explored the timing, location, frequency, sex dependence, and categories of DSB repair events by developing loci with allele-specific Cas9 targets that can be contributed during mating from either male or hermaphrodite germ cells. We found a striking difference in editing efficiency between maternally and paternally contributed genomes. Furthermore, imprecise repair and precise repair from exogenous repair templates occur with high frequency before and after fertilization. Our strategies enhance Cas9-targeting efficiency, lend insight into the timing and mechanisms of DSB repair, and establish guidelines for achieving predictable precise and imprecise repair outcomes with high frequency.
Copyright © 2019 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR-Cas9; Caenorhabditis elegans; DNA repair; Genome editing; homology-directed repair

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30504364      PMCID: PMC6366907          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  68 in total

Review 1.  Cytokinesis: closing in on the central spindle.

Authors:  Aaron F Severson; Bruce Bowerman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  DNA Repair in Drosophila: Mutagens, Models, and Missing Genes.

Authors:  Jeff Sekelsky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos.

Authors:  Hong Ma; Nuria Marti-Gutierrez; Sang-Wook Park; Jun Wu; Yeonmi Lee; Keiichiro Suzuki; Amy Koski; Dongmei Ji; Tomonari Hayama; Riffat Ahmed; Hayley Darby; Crystal Van Dyken; Ying Li; Eunju Kang; A-Reum Park; Daesik Kim; Sang-Tae Kim; Jianhui Gong; Ying Gu; Xun Xu; David Battaglia; Sacha A Krieg; David M Lee; Diana H Wu; Don P Wolf; Stephen B Heitner; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte; Paula Amato; Jin-Soo Kim; Sanjiv Kaul; Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Targeted genome editing across species using ZFNs and TALENs.

Authors:  Andrew J Wood; Te-Wen Lo; Bryan Zeitler; Catherine S Pickle; Edward J Ralston; Andrew H Lee; Rainier Amora; Jeffrey C Miller; Elo Leung; Xiangdong Meng; Lei Zhang; Edward J Rebar; Philip D Gregory; Fyodor D Urnov; Barbara J Meyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Bidirectional Degradation of DNA Cleavage Products Catalyzed by CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Anthony A Stephenson; Austin T Raper; Zucai Suo
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells.

Authors:  Ayal Hendel; Rasmus O Bak; Joseph T Clark; Andrew B Kennedy; Daniel E Ryan; Subhadeep Roy; Israel Steinfeld; Benjamin D Lunstad; Robert J Kaiser; Alec B Wilkens; Rosa Bacchetta; Anya Tsalenko; Douglas Dellinger; Laurakay Bruhn; Matthew H Porteus
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Efficient marker-free recovery of custom genetic modifications with CRISPR/Cas9 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Joshua A Arribere; Ryan T Bell; Becky X H Fu; Karen L Artiles; Phil S Hartman; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  High Efficiency, Homology-Directed Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans Using CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

Authors:  Alexandre Paix; Andrew Folkmann; Dominique Rasoloson; Geraldine Seydoux
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Structural and functional diversity in the neuronal microtubules of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  M Chalfie; J N Thomson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease.

Authors:  Carolin Anders; Ole Niewoehner; Alessia Duerst; Martin Jinek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  22 in total

1.  Efficient Generation of Endogenous Fluorescent Reporters by Nested CRISPR in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Jeremy Vicencio; Carmen Martínez-Fernández; Xènia Serrat; Julián Cerón
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Dose-dependent action of the RNA binding protein FOX-1 to relay X-chromosome number and determine C. elegans sex.

Authors:  Behnom Farboud; Catherine S Novak; Monique Nicoll; Alyssa Quiogue; Barbara J Meyer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 3.  The Caenorhabditis elegans Transgenic Toolbox.

Authors:  Jeremy Nance; Christian Frøkjær-Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A developmental pathway for epithelial-to-motoneuron transformation in C. elegans.

Authors:  Alina Rashid; Maya Tevlin; Yun Lu; Shai Shaham
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 9.995

Review 5.  CRISPR-Cas9: A multifaceted therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Itishree Kaushik; Sharavan Ramachandran; Sanjay K Srivastava
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 7.727

6.  X Chromosome Domain Architecture Regulates Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan but Not Dosage Compensation.

Authors:  Erika C Anderson; Phillip A Frankino; Ryo Higuchi-Sanabria; Qiming Yang; Qian Bian; Katie Podshivalova; Aram Shin; Cynthia Kenyon; Andrew Dillin; Barbara J Meyer
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  Large CRISPR-Cas-induced deletions in the oxamniquine resistance locus of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni.

Authors:  Geetha Sankaranarayanan; Avril Coghlan; Patrick Driguez; Magda E Lotkowska; Mandy Sanders; Nancy Holroyd; Alan Tracey; Matthew Berriman; Gabriel Rinaldi
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 8.  Genome Editing Fidelity in the Context of DNA Sequence and Chromatin Structure.

Authors:  Lyuba Chechik; Ophelie Martin; Evi Soutoglou
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-05-08

9.  Variability in β-catenin pulse dynamics in a stochastic cell fate decision in C. elegans.

Authors:  Jason R Kroll; Jasonas Tsiaxiras; Jeroen S van Zon
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Melting dsDNA Donor Molecules Greatly Improves Precision Genome Editing in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Krishna S Ghanta; Craig C Mello
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.