Pragasan Dean Gopalan1, Santosh Pershad2. 1. Discipline of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban 4001, South Africa; Intensive Care Unit, King Edward VIII Hospital, Congella, Durban, South Africa. Electronic address: gopalan@ukzn.ac.za. 2. Discipline of Anaesthesiology & Critical Care, School of Clinical Medicine, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu Natal, 719 Umbilo Road, Durban 4001, South Africa; Intensive Care Unit, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, 800 Vusi Mzimela Road, Cato Manor, Durban, South Africa. Electronic address: santoshper@ialch.co.za.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ICU is a scarce resource within a high-stress, high-stakes, time-sensitive environment where critically ill patients with life-threatening conditions receive expensive life-sustaining care under the guidance of expert qualified personnel. The implications of decisions such as suitability for admission into ICU are potentially dire and difficult. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of clinicians' subjective perceptions of factors that influence the decision to accept or refuse patients referred to ICU. RESULTS: Twenty studies yielded 56 different factors classified into patient, physician and environmental. Common, important factors were: acute illness severity and reversibility; presence and severity of comorbidities; patient age, functional status, state-of-mind and wishes; physician level of experience and perception of patient QOL; and bed availability. Within-group variability among physicians and thought-deed discordance were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The complex and dynamic ICU triage decision is affected by numerous interacting factors. The literature provides some indication of these factors, but fail to show complexities and interactions between them. A decision tree is proposed. Further research should include a reflection on how decisions for admission to ICU are made, such that a better understanding of these processes can be achieved allowing for improved individual and group consistency.
BACKGROUND: The ICU is a scarce resource within a high-stress, high-stakes, time-sensitive environment where critically illpatients with life-threatening conditions receive expensive life-sustaining care under the guidance of expert qualified personnel. The implications of decisions such as suitability for admission into ICU are potentially dire and difficult. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review of clinicians' subjective perceptions of factors that influence the decision to accept or refuse patients referred to ICU. RESULTS: Twenty studies yielded 56 different factors classified into patient, physician and environmental. Common, important factors were: acute illness severity and reversibility; presence and severity of comorbidities; patient age, functional status, state-of-mind and wishes; physician level of experience and perception of patient QOL; and bed availability. Within-group variability among physicians and thought-deed discordance were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The complex and dynamic ICU triage decision is affected by numerous interacting factors. The literature provides some indication of these factors, but fail to show complexities and interactions between them. A decision tree is proposed. Further research should include a reflection on how decisions for admission to ICU are made, such that a better understanding of these processes can be achieved allowing for improved individual and group consistency.
Authors: Marco A F Pimentel; Oliver C Redfern; James Malycha; Paul Meredith; David Prytherch; Jim Briggs; J Duncan Young; David A Clifton; Lionel Tarassenko; Peter J Watkinson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Neha N Goel; Matthew S Durst; Carmen Vargas-Torres; Lynne D Richardson; Kusum S Mathews Journal: J Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.510