Marco A F Pimentel1, Oliver C Redfern2, James Malycha2, Paul Meredith3, David Prytherch4, Jim Briggs4, J Duncan Young2, David A Clifton1, Lionel Tarassenko1, Peter J Watkinson2,5. 1. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, and. 2. Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 3. Research and Innovation Department, Portsmouth Hospitals University National Health Service Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 4. Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom; and. 5. Kadoorie Centre for Critical Care Research and Education, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Rationale: Late recognition of patient deterioration in hospital is associated with worse outcomes, including higher mortality. Despite the widespread introduction of early warning score (EWS) systems and electronic health records, deterioration still goes unrecognized. Objectives: To develop and externally validate a Hospital- wide Alerting via Electronic Noticeboard (HAVEN) system to identify hospitalized patients at risk of reversible deterioration. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 16 years of age or above admitted to four UK hospitals. The primary outcome was cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to the ICU. We used patient data (vital signs, laboratory tests, comorbidities, and frailty) from one hospital to train a machine-learning model (gradient boosting trees). We internally and externally validated the model and compared its performance with existing scoring systems (including the National EWS, laboratory-based acute physiology score, and electronic cardiac arrest risk triage score). Measurements and Main Results: We developed the HAVEN model using 230,415 patient admissions to a single hospital. We validated HAVEN on 266,295 admissions to four hospitals. HAVEN showed substantially higher discrimination (c-statistic, 0.901 [95% confidence interval, 0.898-0.903]) for the primary outcome within 24 hours of each measurement than other published scoring systems (which range from 0.700 [0.696-0.704] to 0.863 [0.860-0.865]). With a precision of 10%, HAVEN was able to identify 42% of cardiac arrests or unplanned ICU admissions with a lead time of up to 48 hours in advance, compared with 22% by the next best system. Conclusions: The HAVEN machine-learning algorithm for early identification of in-hospital deterioration significantly outperforms other published scores such as the National EWS.
Rationale: Late recognition of patient deterioration in hospital is associated with worse outcomes, including higher mortality. Despite the widespread introduction of early warning score (EWS) systems and electronic health records, deterioration still goes unrecognized. Objectives: To develop and externally validate a Hospital- wide Alerting via Electronic Noticeboard (HAVEN) system to identify hospitalized patients at risk of reversible deterioration. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients 16 years of age or above admitted to four UK hospitals. The primary outcome was cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to the ICU. We used patient data (vital signs, laboratory tests, comorbidities, and frailty) from one hospital to train a machine-learning model (gradient boosting trees). We internally and externally validated the model and compared its performance with existing scoring systems (including the National EWS, laboratory-based acute physiology score, and electronic cardiac arrest risk triage score). Measurements and Main Results: We developed the HAVEN model using 230,415 patient admissions to a single hospital. We validated HAVEN on 266,295 admissions to four hospitals. HAVEN showed substantially higher discrimination (c-statistic, 0.901 [95% confidence interval, 0.898-0.903]) for the primary outcome within 24 hours of each measurement than other published scoring systems (which range from 0.700 [0.696-0.704] to 0.863 [0.860-0.865]). With a precision of 10%, HAVEN was able to identify 42% of cardiac arrests or unplanned ICU admissions with a lead time of up to 48 hours in advance, compared with 22% by the next best system. Conclusions: The HAVEN machine-learning algorithm for early identification of in-hospital deterioration significantly outperforms other published scores such as the National EWS.
Entities:
Keywords:
early warning scores; machine learning; physiological monitoring; retrospective observational study
Authors: Gary B Smith; David R Prytherch; Paul Meredith; Paul E Schmidt; Peter I Featherstone Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Patricia Kipnis; Benjamin J Turk; David A Wulf; Juan Carlos LaGuardia; Vincent Liu; Matthew M Churpek; Santiago Romero-Brufau; Gabriel J Escobar Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Rose S Solomon; Gregory S Corwin; Dawn C Barclay; Sarah F Quddusi; Michelle D Dannenberg Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Stephen Gerry; Timothy Bonnici; Jacqueline Birks; Shona Kirtley; Pradeep S Virdee; Peter J Watkinson; Gary S Collins Journal: BMJ Date: 2020-05-20
Authors: Daniel D Im; Eugene Laksana; David R Ledbetter; Melissa D Aczon; Robinder G Khemani; Randall C Wetzel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Deepshikha Charan Ashana; George L Anesi; Vincent X Liu; Gabriel J Escobar; Christopher Chesley; Nwamaka D Eneanya; Gary E Weissman; William Dwight Miller; Michael O Harhay; Scott D Halpern Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Sherif Gonem; Adam Taylor; Grazziela Figueredo; Sarah Forster; Philip Quinlan; Jonathan M Garibaldi; Tricia M McKeever; Dominick Shaw Journal: Respir Res Date: 2022-08-11