Literature DB >> 3050264

[Principles for evaluating simple, diagnostic tests].

K Richter1, U Abel, R Klar, J Köbberling, H J Trampisch, J Windeler.   

Abstract

The fundamental terms in the evaluation of diagnostic tests are described and the differences to corresponding test parameters in clinical chemistry are emphasized. The derivation of a two-by two contingency table is explained in detail and basic characteristics of diagnostic tests, i.e. sensitivity and specificity as well as their independence of the prevalence (in the sense of a-priori-probability) is pointed out. The importance of the so-called predictive values is shown graphically, also the problem of selecting a cut-off-level (discrimination value) for the evaluation of quantitative data. The various attempts to find a single value for the description of a diagnostic test are discussed and it is stressed that there is no principal necessity to use other terms than those mentioned above. Nevertheless it is possible to give a prevalence-independent measure which has some additional advantages in rating and comparing simple diagnostic tests.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3050264     DOI: 10.1007/BF01726922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0023-2173


  17 in total

1.  Efficacy...what's that??

Authors:  R S Bell
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  [Bases of the planning of diagnostic studies].

Authors:  J Windeler; H J Trampisch; J Köbberling
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1988-02-12       Impact factor: 0.628

4.  Evaluation of receiver operating characteristic curve data in terms of information theory, with applications in radiography.

Authors:  C E Metz; D J Goodenough; K Rossmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Decision analysis.

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making.

Authors:  B J McNeil; E Keller; S J Adelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  [Predictive value of diagnostic procedures].

Authors:  J Köbberling
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1982-04-16       Impact factor: 0.628

8.  The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research.

Authors:  S B Sheps; M T Schechter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The threshold approach to clinical decision making.

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations.

Authors:  T J Vecchio
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Evaluating diagnostic measures].

Authors:  K Richter
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1990-03-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.