Literature DB >> 7366635

The threshold approach to clinical decision making.

S G Pauker, J P Kassirer.   

Abstract

The physician's estimate of the probability that a patient has a particular disease is a principal factor in the determination of whether to withhold treatment, obtain more data by testing, or treat without subjecting the patient to the risks of further diagnostic tests. Using the concepts of decision analysis, we have derived expressions for two threshold probabilities involved in this choice: a "testing" threshold and a "test-treatment" threshold. Values can be assigned to these thresholds from data on the reliability and potential risks of the diagnostic test and the benefits and risks of a specific treatment. Treatment should be withheld if the probability of disease is smaller than the testing threshold, and treatment should be given without further testing if the probability of disease is greater than the test-treatment threshold. The test should be performed (with treatment depending on the test outcome) only if the probability of disease is between the two thresholds. The method exposes important principles of decision making and helps the clinician develop a rational, quantitative approach to the use of diagnostic tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7366635     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198005153022003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  221 in total

1.  Acknowledgment of uncertainty: a fundamental means to ensure scientific and ethical validity in clinical research.

Authors:  B Djulbegovic
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Assessing diagnostic and screening tests: Part 1. Concepts.

Authors:  R Gilbert; S Logan; V A Moyer; E J Elliott
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-06

Review 3.  Determination of the clinical importance of study results.

Authors:  Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Andreas Laupacis; Keith O'Rourke; Frank J Molnar; Jeffery Mahon; Karen B Y Chan; George Wells
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  A readers' guide to the interpretation of diagnostic test properties: clinical example of sepsis.

Authors:  Joachim E Fischer; Lucas M Bachmann; Roman Jaeschke
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  The standard gamble between cataract extraction and AMD.

Authors:  Paulus T V M de Jong; Jacobus Lubsen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Criteria for decision-making--what makes sense?

Authors:  Bernd Richter
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2003-10-30       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Expert testimony based on decision analysis: a malpractice case report.

Authors:  S S Weir; P Curtis; R A McNutt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Sensitivity analysis in health economic and pharmacoeconomic studies. An appraisal of the literature.

Authors:  K E Agro; C A Bradley; N Mittmann; M Iskedjian; A L Ilersich; T R Einarson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Could our pretest probabilities become evidence based? A prospective survey of hospital practice.

Authors:  W Scott Richardson; Walter A Polashenski; Brett W Robbins
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Physician Bayesian updating from personal beliefs about the base rate and likelihood ratio.

Authors:  Benjamin Margolin Rottman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.