Literature DB >> 30501560

Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.

Sarah Risse1, Stefan Seelig1.   

Abstract

Using gaze-contingent display changes in the boundary paradigm during sentence reading, it has recently been shown that parafoveal word-processing difficulties affect fixations on words to the right of the boundary. Current interpretations of this post-boundary preview difficulty effect range from delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects in parallel word-processing models to forced fixations in serial word-processing models. However, these findings are based on an experimental design that, while allowing to isolate preview difficulty effects, might have established a bias with respect to asymmetries in parafoveal preview benefit for high-frequent and low-frequent target words. Here, we present a revision of this paradigm varying the preview's lexical frequency and keeping the target word constant. We found substantial effects of the preview difficulty in fixation durations after the boundary confirming that preview processing affects the oculomotor decisions not only via trans-saccadic integration of preview and target word information. An additional time-course analysis showed that the preview difficulty effect was significant across the full fixation duration distribution on the target word without any evidence on the pretarget word before the boundary. We discuss implications of the accumulating evidence of post-boundary preview difficulty effects for models of eye movement control during reading.

Keywords:  Eye tracking; delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects; forced fixations; parafoveal preview benefit; reading

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30501560     DOI: 10.1177/1747021818819990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  3 in total

Review 1.  Preview frequency effects in reading: evidence from Chinese.

Authors:  Jinger Pan; Ming Yan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-27

2.  Do Readers Integrate Phonological Codes Across Saccades? A Bayesian Meta-Analysis and a Survey of the Unpublished Literature.

Authors:  Martin R Vasilev; Mark Yates; Timothy J Slattery
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2019-10-04

3.  Predictive modeling of parafoveal information processing during reading.

Authors:  Stefan Seelig; Sarah Risse; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.