| Literature DB >> 30498883 |
Vít Herynek1,2, Marie Martinisková3, Yulia Bobrova4, Andrea Gálisová5, Jan Kotek3, Petr Hermann3, Filip Koucký3, Daniel Jirák5, Milan Hájek5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: 19F MRI requires biocompatible and non-toxic soluble contrast agents with high fluorine content and with suitable 19F relaxation times. Probes based on a DOTP chelate with 12 magnetically equivalent fluorine atoms (DOTP-tfe) and a lanthanide(III) ion shortening the relaxation times were prepared and tested.Entities:
Keywords: Fluorine-19 magnetic resonance imaging; Lanthanide series elements; Macrocyclic ligand complexes; Molecular probes; Phosphinic acid complexes; Relaxation times
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30498883 PMCID: PMC6514088 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-018-0721-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: MAGMA ISSN: 0968-5243 Impact factor: 2.310
Fig. 1Structure of the Ln3+–DOTP-tfe complexes (a). Ln3+ = La, Ce, Dy, Ho, Tm, and Yb. Visualization of their NMR spectra showing chemical shift and line broadening caused by the complexed lanthanide(III) ions (b)
The 19F relaxation times of the empty ligand and trivalent cerium (Ce), dysprosium (Dy), holmium (Ho), thulium (Tm), and ytterbium (Yb) complexes with DOTP-tfe
| Complex | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Empty ligand DOTP-tfe | 1103 ± 49 | 363 ± 23 | 5.10 ± 0.20 |
| La–DOTP-tfe | 835 ± 26 | 53.8 ± 2.6 | 3.72 ± 0.13 |
| Ce–DOTP-tfe | 287 ± 46 | 124.4 ± 0.9 | 3.13 ± 0.16 |
| Dy–DOTP-tfe | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 1.14 ± 0.06 |
| Ho–DOTP-tfe | 9.8 ± 0.3 | 8.2 ± 0.3 | 1.10 ± 0.06 |
| Tm–DOTP-tfe | 6.5 ± 0.4 | 4.9 ± 1.0 | 1.36 ± 0.07 |
| Yb–DOTP-tfe | 76 ± 9 | 72.1 ± 1.0 | 1.44 ± 0.07 |
Fig. 219F MRI of phantoms containing different concentrations of two selected complexes. a Arrangement of the test tubes with various concentrations of the complexes. b Ce–DOTP-tfe complex measured by a turbo spin echo sequence. c Dy–DOTP-tfe complex measured by a gradient echo sequence. Concentrations of the complexes down to 1.25 mM (corresponding to 15 mM of 19F) were detectable within a 15–20 min acquisition time in both cases
Signal-to-noise ratios of phantoms containing trivalent cerium (Ce), dysprosium (Dy), holmium (Ho), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb), and lanthanum (La) complexes of DOTP-tfe in vitro
| Probe | Probe concentration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.625 mM | 1.25 mM | 2.5 mM | 5 mM | |
| Empty ligand | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 9.4 ± 0.6 |
| La–DOTP-tfe | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 5.2 ± 0.4 | 11.9 ± 0.8 |
| Ce–DOTP-tfe | 2.1 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.8 | 7.1 ± 1.8 | 13.6 ± 3.4 |
| Dy–DOTP-tfe | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 9.3 ± 1.8 | 14.7 ± 2.9 |
| Ho–DOTP-tfe | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 7.4 ± 0.6 | 14.3 ± 1.1 |
| Tm–DOTP-tfe | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 9.5 ± 1.1 | 16.5 ± 2.0 |
| Yb–DOTP-tfe | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 7.3 ± 2.0 | 15.3 ± 4.2 |
The empty ligand is added for comparison. The MRI data were acquired with optimized imaging sequences with 15–20 min scanning time
Fig. 3MR images of two different probes injected into the muscle of a healthy rat. a Yb–DOTP-tfe complex (0.5 mL, concentration 2.7 mM). b Ce–DOTP-tfe complex (0.5 mL, concentration 2.7 mM). First row—anatomical T2-weighted 1H MRI images (gray scale); second row—19F MRI (red color) extrapolated to the same matrix; third row—overlay of the 1H and 19F MR images. Note the hypointense signal on the 1H MRI images caused by the probe. Small displacement of the 19F signal in the case of Ce–DOTP-tfe in b may be caused by the extrapolation of the low image matrix of 19F MRI or by probe diffusion during the scanning