Literature DB >> 30498550

A physician-physiotherapist collaborative model in a family medicine teaching clinic.

Simon Deslauriers1,2,3, Marie-Eve Toutant2,3, Caroline Laberge2,3, Annie St-Pierre2,3, François Desmeules4,5, Kadija Perreault1,2.   

Abstract

Persons with musculoskeletal disorders frequently seek care in family medicine clinics. However, musculoskeletal education provided in medical schools is often considered insufficient. The implementation of a collaborative model that integrates physiotherapists into teaching clinics may benefit the musculoskeletal training of medical residents. This paper describes a model developed in a family medicine teaching clinic by examining the interprofessional educational and collaborative activities implemented in this model. The model allowed to provide physiotherapy services, involve the physiotherapist in the training of family medicine residents and enhance interprofessional collaboration, particularly for the management of persons with musculoskeletal disorders.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30498550      PMCID: PMC6260508     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Med Educ J


Introduction

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are one of the most frequent reasons for primary care consultations in Canada.[1,2] Despite the predominance of MSDs in primary care settings, physicians and medical students reportedly have a low level of knowledge and clinical confidence in the management of MSDs.[3-5] This could be partially explained by the insufficient musculoskeletal education in the curriculum of medical schools.[5-8] Physiotherapists may help improve the musculoskeletal training of medical residents, as they are frequently involved in the management of MSDs and have extensive knowledge and competency in this field.[9] This paper describes a collaborative model in which physiotherapists are integrated into a primary care team in a family medicine teaching clinic. We examined interprofessional educational and collaborative activities implemented in this model using clinical and administrative data. The ethics review board of the CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale approved this study as program evaluation.

A collaborative initiative

In 2009, a physiotherapist was hired to join a primary care team in a university-affiliated Family Medicine Group (U-FMG) located in Québec City, Canada. The primary care team included approximately twenty-eight medical residents, seventeen family physicians, one physiotherapist as well as nurses, social workers, and nutritionists. This initiative aimed to 1) provide physiotherapy services, 2) involve the physiotherapist in the training of family medicine residents, and 3) enhance interprofessional collaboration.

Interprofessional collaborative activities

Collaboration between physiotherapists and family medicine residents/physicians first took the form of medical referral to physiotherapy. A total of 1,321 referrals were made between 2009 and 2015, for an average of 220.2 ± 44.0 (mean ± standard deviation) per year (Figure 1). Moreover, on-site physiotherapists were able to provide prompt answers to oral requests made by family medicine residents/physicians. For example, they offered clinical advice or conducted joint assessments of particular patients with the residents/physicians. From 2013 to 2016, 468 patient-related informal discussions occurred between the physiotherapists and the residents and 452 between the physiotherapists and the family physicians, for a total average of 306.7 ± 73.1 discussions per year.
Figure 1

Number of physiotherapy referrals per reason of referral, per year.

Number of physiotherapy referrals per reason of referral, per year.

Interprofessional educational activities

Physiotherapists contributed to the training of residents by providing 8.9 ± 4.5 planned teaching lessons (e.g., lectures and practice sessions on the musculoskeletal physical exam) and 36.0 ± 17.0 observation sessions per year. These observation sessions allowed residents to spend a few hours with the physiotherapist to gain insight into their clinical practices. Physiotherapists also took part in a weekly formal interprofessional meeting, during which a resident discussed a specific patient’s case with an interprofessional group.

Conclusion

This innovative collaborative model in which physiotherapists are integrated in a family medicine teaching clinic encompasses a variety of interprofessional activities. Based on our experience, such an innovative model has the potential to enhance the musculoskeletal training of medical residents and the management of patients with MSDs in primary care. Consequently, we believe that this model has implications for researchers, decision makers and clinicians. Identifying barriers and enablers to the implementation of this model and assessing its efficacy could serve as suggestions for future research.
  9 in total

1.  Educating medical students about musculoskeletal problems. Are community needs reflected in the curricula of Canadian medical schools?

Authors:  S J Pinney; W D Regan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Musculoskeletal Medicine Is Underrepresented in the American Medical School Clinical Curriculum.

Authors:  Benedict F DiGiovanni; Leigh T Sundem; Richard D Southgate; David R Lambert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The current state of musculoskeletal clinical skills teaching for preclerkship medical students.

Authors:  Anna E Oswald; Mary J Bell; Linda Snell; Jeffrey Wiseman
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Health care utilization for musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Crystal MacKay; Mayilee Canizares; Aileen M Davis; Elizabeth M Badley
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Medical student musculoskeletal education: an institutional survey.

Authors:  Nathan W Skelley; Miho J Tanaka; Logan M Skelley; Dawn M LaPorte
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  [Chronic musculoskeletal conditions and comorbidities in primary care settings].

Authors:  Catherine Hudon; Martin Fortin; Hassan Soubhi
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Musculoskeletal education: a curriculum evaluation at one university.

Authors:  Marcia L Clark; Carol R Hutchison; Jocelyn M Lockyer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  A description of physical therapists' knowledge in managing musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  John D Childs; Julie M Whitman; Phillip S Sizer; Maria L Pugia; Timothy W Flynn; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Musculoskeletal education: an assessment of the clinical confidence of medical students.

Authors:  Jeremy Truntzer; Alison Lynch; David Kruse; Michael Prislin
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2014-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.