Feng-Ming Spring Kong1, Vitali Moiseenko2, Jing Zhao3, Michael T Milano4, Ling Li5, Andreas Rimner6, Shiva Das7, X Allen Li8, Moyed Miften9, ZhongXing Liao10, Mary Martel10, Soren M Bentzen11, Andrew Jackson6, Jimm Grimm12, Lawrence B Marks7, Ellen Yorke6. 1. University Hospitals/Seidman Cancer Center and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Electronic address: fxk132@case.edu. 2. University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. 3. Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. 4. University of Rochester, Rochester, New York. 5. Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China. 6. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 7. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 8. Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 9. University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado. 10. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 11. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 12. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and is often used for recurrent lung cancer and pulmonary metastases. Radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT), including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, is a major concern for which it is important to understand dosimetric and clinical predictors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was undertaken through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Working Group on Biological Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Data from studies of lung SBRT published through the summer of 2016 that provided detailed information about RILT were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-seven studies were ultimately considered. Definitions of the risk organ and complication endpoints as well as dose-volume information presented varied among studies. The risk of RILT, including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, was reported to be associated with the size and location of the tumor. Patients with interstitial lung disease appear to be especially susceptible to severe RILT. A variety of dosimetric parameters were reported to be associated with RILT. There was no apparent threshold "tolerance dose-volume" level. However, most studies noted safe treatment with a rate of symptomatic RILT of <10% to 15% after lung SBRT with a mean lung dose (MLD) of the combined lungs ≤8 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions and the percent of total lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V20) <10% to 15%. CONCLUSIONS: To allow more rigorous analysis of this complication, future studies should standardize reporting by including standardized endpoint and volume definitions and providing dose-volume information for all patients, with and without RILT.
PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care for inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer and is often used for recurrent lung cancer and pulmonary metastases. Radiation-induced lung toxicity (RILT), including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, is a major concern for which it is important to understand dosimetric and clinical predictors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This study was undertaken through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine's Working Group on Biological Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Data from studies of lung SBRT published through the summer of 2016 that provided detailed information about RILT were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-seven studies were ultimately considered. Definitions of the risk organ and complication endpoints as well as dose-volume information presented varied among studies. The risk of RILT, including radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis, was reported to be associated with the size and location of the tumor. Patients with interstitial lung disease appear to be especially susceptible to severe RILT. A variety of dosimetric parameters were reported to be associated with RILT. There was no apparent threshold "tolerance dose-volume" level. However, most studies noted safe treatment with a rate of symptomatic RILT of <10% to 15% after lung SBRT with a mean lung dose (MLD) of the combined lungs ≤8 Gy in 3 to 5 fractions and the percent of total lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V20) <10% to 15%. CONCLUSIONS: To allow more rigorous analysis of this complication, future studies should standardize reporting by including standardized endpoint and volume definitions and providing dose-volume information for all patients, with and without RILT.
Authors: Hui Liu; Xu Zhang; Yevgeniy Y Vinogradskiy; Stephen G Swisher; Ritsuko Komaki; Joe Y Chang Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Zishan Allibhai; Mojgan Taremi; Andrea Bezjak; Anthony Brade; Andrew J Hope; Alexander Sun; B C John Cho Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Qiao-Qiao Li; Qing-Yong Xu; Pamela K Allen; Neal Rebueno; Daniel R Gomez; Peter Balter; Ritsuko Komaki; Reza Mehran; Stephen G Swisher; Jack A Roth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Joe Y Chang; Hui Liu; Peter Balter; Ritsuko Komaki; Zhongxing Liao; James Welsh; Reza J Mehran; Jack A Roth; Stephen G Swisher Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Vitali Moiseenko; Jimm Grimm; Ellen Yorke; Andrew Jackson; Anthony Yip; Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Anand Mahadevan; Kenneth Forster; Michael T Milano; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Cureus Date: 2020-10-05
Authors: Kim Melanie Kraus; Caroline Bauer; Benedikt Feuerecker; Julius Clemens Fischer; Kai Joachim Borm; Denise Bernhardt; Stephanie Elisabeth Combs Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Vitali Moiseenko; Lawrence B Marks; Jimm Grimm; Andrew Jackson; Michael T Milano; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth; Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Niclas Pettersson; Ellen Yorke; Issam El Naqa Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-12-23 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Daniel R Owen; Yilun Sun; Philip S Boonstra; Matthew McFarlane; Benjamin L Viglianti; James M Balter; Issam El Naqa; Matthew J Schipper; Caitlin A Schonewolf; Randall K Ten Haken; Feng-Ming S Kong; Shruti Jolly; Martha M Matuszak Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-02-07
Authors: Austin J Bartl; Mary Mahoney; Mark W Hennon; Sai Yendamuri; Gregory M M Videtic; Kevin L Stephans; Shankar Siva; Mark K Farrugia; Sung Jun Ma; Anurag K Singh Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Michael T Milano; Jimm Grimm; Andrzej Niemierko; Scott G Soltys; Vitali Moiseenko; Kristin J Redmond; Ellen Yorke; Arjun Sahgal; Jinyu Xue; Anand Mahadevan; Alexander Muacevic; Lawrence B Marks; Lawrence R Kleinberg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Laura Cella; Serena Monti; Maria Thor; Andreas Rimner; Joseph O Deasy; Giuseppe Palma Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-07-25 Impact factor: 6.639