Literature DB >> 30496830

Developing a short-form of the Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale: The Genomics Outcome Scale.

Peter E Grant1, Maria Pampaka2, Katherine Payne3, Angus Clarke4, Marion McAllister5.   

Abstract

The Genetic Counselling Outcome Scale (GCOS-24) is a 24-item patient reported outcome measure for use in evaluations of genetic counselling and testing services. The aim of this study was to develop a short form of GCOS-24. The study comprised three phases. Phase I: Cognitive interviews were used to explore interpretability of GCOS-24 items and which GCOS-24 items were most valued by the target population. Phase II: The Graded Response Model was used to analyse an existing set of GCOS-24 responses (n = 395) to examine item discrimination. Phase III: Item Selection. Three principles guided the approach to item selection (i) Items with poor discriminative properties were not selected; (ii) To avoid redundancy, items capturing a similar outcome were not selected together; item information curves and cognitive interview findings were used to establish superior items. (iii) Rasch analysis was then used to determine the optimal scale. In Phase I, ten cognitive interviews were conducted with individuals affected by or at risk for a genetic condition, recruited from patient support groups. Analysis of interview transcripts identified twelve GCOS-24 items which were highly valued by participants. In Phase II, Graded Response Model item characteristic curves and item information curves were produced. In Phase III, findings from Phases I and II were used to select ten highly-valued items that perform well. Finally, items were iteratively removed and permutated to establish optimal fit statistics under the Rasch model. A six-item questionnaire with a five-point Likert Scale was produced (The Genomics Outcome Scale (GOS)). Correlation between GCOS-24 and GOS scores is high (r = 0.838 at 99% confidence), suggesting that GOS maintains the ability of GCOS-24 to capture empowerment, whilst providing a less burdensome scale for respondents. This study represents the first step in developing a preference-based measure which could be used in the evaluation of technologies and services used in genomic medicine.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GCOS-24; GOS; Genetic counselling; Item response theory; Patient reported outcome measure

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30496830     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Genet        ISSN: 1769-7212            Impact factor:   2.708


  9 in total

1.  The genome empowerment scale: An assessment of parental empowerment in families with undiagnosed disease.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Kelly Schoch; Jennifer Sullivan; Heidi Cope; Rebecca Spillmann; Christina G S Palmer; Loren Pena; Yong-Hui Jiang; Nicole Daniels; Nicole Walley; Khoon G Tan; Stephen R Hooper; Vandana Shashi
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Mixed-methods evaluation of the NHS Genomic Medicine Service for paediatric rare diseases: study protocol [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations].

Authors:  Celine Lewis; James Buchannan; Angus Clarke; Emma Clement; Bettina Friedrich; Jillian Hastings-Ward; Melissa Hill; Ruth Horn; Anneke M Lucassen; Chris Patch; Alexandra Pickard; Lauren Roberts; Saskia C Sanderson; Sarah L Lewell; Cecilia Vindrola-Padros; Monica Lakhanpaul
Journal:  NIHR Open Res       Date:  2021-11-22

Review 3.  Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: a sequential systematic review.

Authors:  Ebony Richardson; Alison McEwen; Toby Newton-John; Ashley Crook; Chris Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.351

Review 4.  Clinical utility of genomic sequencing: a measurement toolkit.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; David Dimmock; David Bick; John W Belmont; Robert C Green; Brendan Lanpher; Vaidehi Jobanputra; Roberto Mendoza; Shashi Kulkarni; Megan E Grove; Stacie L Taylor; Euan Ashley
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 8.617

5.  Genetics Adviser: a protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital platform for genetics service delivery.

Authors:  Salma Shickh; Daena Hirjikaka; Marc Clausen; Rita Kodida; Chloe Mighton; Emma Reble; Jordan Sam; Seema Panchal; Melyssa Aronson; Tracy Graham; Susan Randall Armel; Emily Glogowski; Christine Elser; Andrea Eisen; June C Carroll; Cheryl Shuman; Emily Seto; Nancy N Baxter; Adena Scheer; Serena Shastri-Estrada; Geoff Feldman; Kevin E Thorpe; Kasmintan A Schrader; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Raymond H Kim; Hanna Faghfoury; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  National Society of Genetic Counselors' Board of Directors response to Myers et al. 'A report of the AGCPD task force to evaluate associations between select admissions requirements, demographics, and performance on ABGC certification examination'.

Authors:  Heather Zierhut; Leila Jamal; Sara Riordan; Patrick Wilson; Meghan Carey; Deepti Babu
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.717

Review 7.  Barriers to genetic testing in clinical psychiatry and ways to overcome them: from clinicians' attitudes to sociocultural differences between patients across the globe.

Authors:  Justo Pinzón-Espinosa; Marte van der Horst; Janneke Zinkstok; Jehannine Austin; Cora Aalfs; Albert Batalla; Patrick Sullivan; Jacob Vorstman; Jurjen J Luykx
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 7.989

8.  Adaptation and validation of the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale for autism spectrum disorders and related conditions.

Authors:  Afiqah Yusuf; Iskra Peltekova; Tal Savion-Lemieux; Jennifer Frei; Ridha Joober; Jennifer Howe; Stephen W Scherer; Mayada Elsabbagh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Utility of Genetic Testing from the Perspective of Parents/Caregivers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Stephanie Luca; Daniel Assamad; Ayushi Bhatt; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.