| Literature DB >> 30496270 |
Pimjai Ananta1,2, Irin Kham-Ngam1,3, Ploenchan Chetchotisakd4, Prajuab Chaimanee2, Wipa Reechaipichitkul4, Wises Namwat1,3, Viraphong Lulitanond1,3, Kiatichai Faksri1,3.
Abstract
Mycobacterium abscessus is an important infectious agent highly associated with drug resistance and treatment failure. We investigated the drug resistance situation of M. abscessus in Northeast Thailand and the possible genetic basis for this. Sixty-eight M. abscessus clinical isolates were obtained from 26 patients at Srinagarind Hospital during 2012-2016. Drug susceptibility tests and sequencing of erm(41), rrl and rrs genes were performed. Mycobacterium abscessus was resistant to 11/15 antibiotics (nearly 100% resistance in each case). Partial susceptibility to four antibiotics was found (amikacin, tigecycline, clarithromycin and linezolid). Non-massiliense subspecies were significantly associated with clarithromycin resistance (p<0.0001) whereas massiliense subspecies were associated with tigecycline resistance (p = 0.028). Inducible clarithromycin resistance was seen in 22/68 (32.35%) isolates: 21 of these isolates (95.45%) belonged to non-massiliense subspecies and resistance was explicable by the T28C mutation in erm(41). Inducible clarithromycin resistance was found in one isolate of the massiliense subspecies. Acquired clarithromycin resistance explicable by the A2271G/C mutation of rrl was seen in only 7/16 (43.75%) of strains. Inducible and acquired resistance mechanisms can be interchangeable during the course of infection. Rrs mutations were not associated with amikacin resistance in our study. Antibiotic resistance in subspecies of M. abscessus was reported from Northeast Thailand. Known resistance-associated mutations cannot explain all of the resistance patterns observed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30496270 PMCID: PMC6264522 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Primers used for gene sequencing of erm(41), rrl and rrs.
| Genes | Primers | Sequences (5’ to 3’) | Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERM_F | 620 | ||
| ERM_R | |||
| RRL_F | 1100 | ||
| RRL_R | |||
| RRS_F | 1600 | ||
| RRS_R |
Drug susceptibility patterns of Mycobacterium abscessus isolates from clinical specimens of patients in Northeast Thailand.
| Drug susceptibility patterns (n/%) | Interpretation criteria | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drugs in the guidelines | S | I | R | S | I | R |
| Amikacin | 7 (10.29%) | 5 (7.35%) | ≤16 | 32 | ≥64 | |
| Cefoxitin | 0 (0%) | 11 (16.18%) | 57 (83.82%) | ≤16 | 32–64 | ≥128 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | ≤1 | 2 | ≥4 |
| Clarithromycin | 6 (8.82%) | 29 (42.64%) | ≤2 | 4 | ≥8 | |
| Doxycycline | 1(1.47%) | 5 (7.35%) | 62 (91.18%) | ≤1 | 2–4 | ≥8 |
| Imipenem | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | ≤4 | 8–16 | ≥32 |
| Linezolid | 16 (23.53%) | 42 (61.76%) | ≤8 | 16 | ≥32 | |
| Moxifloxacin | 0 (0%) | 2(2.94%) | 66 (97.05%) | ≤1 | 2 | ≥4 |
| Tobramycin | 0 (0%) | 1(1.47%) | 67 (98.53%) | ≤2 | 4 | ≥8 |
| SXT | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | ≤2/38 | - | ≥4/76 |
| Drugs out of guidelines | Low | Moderate | High | Low | Moderate | High |
| AMC | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | ≤16 | 32 | ≥64 |
| Cefepime | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | ≤8 | 16 | ≥32 |
| Ceftriaxone | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | ≤16 | 32 | ≥64 |
| Minocycline | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 68 (100%) | ≤2 | 4 | ≥8 |
| Tigecycline | 15 (22.06%) | 19 (27.94%) | ≤1 | 2 | ≥4 | |
CLSI M24-A2 guidelines
b Natural resistance
Antibiotics not described in the M24-A2 guidelines and levels of resistance interpreted here as low, moderate and high. S = Susceptible, I = Intermediate, R = Resistant, Low = Low resistance, Moderate = Moderate resistance, High = High resistance, SXT = Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, AMC = Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid
Comparisons of drug susceptibility pattern in massiliense and non-massiliense subspecies of M. abscessus isolated from clinical specimens.
| Drug susceptibility patterns of | P-values among | S vs combined | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotics in the guidelines | non- | |||||||
| S | I | R | S | I | R | |||
| Amikacin | 2 (5.41%) | 2 (5.41%) | 5 (16.13%) | 3 (9.68%) | 0.251 | 0.106 | ||
| Cefoxitin | 0 (0%) | 4 (10.81%) | 33 (89.19%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (22.58%) | 24 (77.42%) | 0.189 | NA |
| Ciprofloxacin | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 31 (100%) | NA | NA |
| Clarithromycin | 2 (5.41%) | 9 (24.32%) | 7 (22.58%) | 4 (12.90%) | ||||
| Doxycycline | 0 (0%) | 2 (5.41%) | 35 (94.59%) | 1 (3.23%) | 3 (9.68%) | 27 (87.10%) | 0.424 | 0.456 |
| Imipenem | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 31 (100%) | NA | NA |
| Linezolid | 3 (8.11%) | 9 (24.32%) | 7 (22.58%) | 7 (22.58%) | 17 (54.84%) | 0.239 | 0.167 | |
| Moxifloxacin | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (6.45%) | 29 (93.55%) | NA | NA |
| SXT | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 31 (100%) | NA | NA |
| Tobramycin | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.23%) | 30 (96.77%) | NA | NA |
| Antibiotics out of the guidelines | Low | Moderate | High | Low | Moderate | High | Among 3 | S vs combined |
| AMC | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 31 (100%) | NA | NA |
| Cefepime | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 31 (100%) | NA | NA |
| Ceftriaxone | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 31 (100%) | NA | NA |
| Minocycline | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 37 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 31 (100%) | NA | NA |
| Tigecycline | 14 (37.84%) | 20 (64.52%) | 6 (19.35%) | 5 (16.13%) | 0.066 | |||
SXT = Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, AMC = Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid * the massiliense subspecies was defined by characteristic deletions in the erm(41) gene (a 2-bp deletion of nucleotides 64–65 and a 274-bp deletion of nucleotides 159–432). Sequence data for erm(41) were available for 64/68 isolates, enabling classification to subspecies level. The subspecific predictions for the remaining 4 isolates were based on MLST data (Kham-ngam I. et al, unpublished). The interpretation of drug susceptibility patterns is described in .
Association between gene sequence and MIC levels for clarithromycin and amikacin.
| Antibiotics | Genes | Increased MIC | Decreased MIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of isolates | Variants | No. of isolates | Variants | ||
| Clarithromycin | 11 | De11A (10) | 11 | T159C, A238G, G255A, G279T, A330C, T336C (n = 3) | |
| 11 | De1954A (11) | 11 | De1954A (11) | ||
| Amikacin | 10 | Ins583T (n = 1) | 11 | Ins926T (n = 1), Ins812G (n = 1) Ins910G (n = 1), Ins891G (n = 1), | |
Note
a These mutations were also found in most susceptible strains (no association with MIC levels).
b no sequence data available in 1 case. Serial isolates exhibiting both increase and decrease of MIC levels at different sampling times were included. The specified variants were relative to the previous isolate. Subspecies genetic markers were not included in the table. All M. abscessus from true infection cases (20 cases, 52 isolates) and colonization cases (6 cases, 16 isolates) were analyzed.
Analysis between erm(41) gene sequence and clarithromycin susceptibility.
| Patterns | n (%) | SNPs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indels | |||
| Acquired resistance | 8 | - C41A, A46G, G85T, C90T, G109A, A123G, A438C, G466A (n = 8) | -De11A (n = 8) |
| Intermediate resistance | 2 | - C41A, A46G, G85T,C90T, G109A, A123G, A438C, G466A (n = 1) | -De11A (n = 2) |
| Susceptible | 24 | - C41A, A46G, G85T, C90T, G109A, A123G, A438C (n = 1) | -De11A (n = 24) |
| Non- | |||
| Inducible resistance | 21 | - T159C, A238G, G255A, A330C (n = 8) | -De11A (n = 19) |
| Acquired resistance | 8 | - A120G (n = 1) | -De11A(n = 7) |
| Any resistance | 29 | - G158A (n = 2) | - De11A (n = 27) |
Note: Sequence data were not available for 2/37 isolates belonging to the massiliense subspecies and 2/31 non-massiliense isolates
a One isolate of the massiliense subspecies (defined based on erm(41) gene sequence) exhibited an inducible resistance pattern (susceptible at day 5 and became resistant at day 14).
b There was 1 isolate that has MIC = 4 μg/ml at day 3 and then became resist at day 5 and day 14 was included as acquired resistant. All 64 isolates had T28 in the erm(41) gene.
Comparison of SNPs of the erm(41) gene and MIC level for clarithromycin.
| SNPs | Variants | n (%) | MIC (mean (SD)) | P-values |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C41A/A46G/G85T/C90T/G109A/A123G/ A438C, De61G De62 and De156-429 | Wt | 29 (45.31) | 9.03 (6.09) | <0.0001 |
| Mut | 35 (54.69) | 4.24 (6.56) | ||
| T159C /A330C | Wt | 37 (57.81) | 4.87 (6.92) | 0.002 |
| Mut | 27 (42.19) | 8.51 (5.99) | ||
| G279T/T336C | Wt | 49 (76.56) | 6.23 (7.14) | 0.114 |
| Mut | 15 (23.44) | 7.00 (5.40) |
* massiliense subspecies marker. Wt: wild type (strains without specified mutations), Mut: mutant (strains with specified mutations).
Association between rrl gene sequence and clarithromycin susceptibility in M. abscessus (n = 64).
| Patterns | N (%) | SNPs | Indels |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resistant | 27 (42.19) | - A2271G (n = 5) | - De1954A (n = 27) |
| Intermediate | 6 (9.40) | - Ins1969C (n = 1) | - De1954A (n = 6) |
| Susceptible | 31 (48.44) | - Ins1969C (n = 1) | - De1954A (n = 31) |
a rrl SNPs conferring acquired resistance to clarithromycin were based on a previous study [6] and were found in 7/16 isolates with acquired resistance. Sequence data were not available for 4 of the 68 M. abscessus isolates. Twenty-seven clarithromycin-resistant isolates (based on results of drug susceptibility tests at day 5) comprised of 16 acquired resistant and 11 inducible resistant strains, 6 isolates with intermediate resistance against clarithromycin comprised of 2 that exhibited continuous intermediate resistance and 4 that exhibited inducible resistance (MIC≥8 μg/ml at day 14), 31 susceptible strains (based on day 5 test results) comprised of 24 susceptible strains and 7 that exhibited inducible resistant at day 14.
Association between SNP of rrl gene and MIC level (μg/ml) for clarithromycin.
| SNP | Variants | n (%) | MIC (mean (SD)) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2271G/C | A (wt) | 57 (89.06) | 5.23 (6.18) | 0.001 |
| G/C | 7 (10.94) | 16.00 (0.00) |