Literature DB >> 30489433

Why Do Women Get Cervical Cancer in an Organized Screening Program in Canada?

Rebecca Jackson1, Li Wang2, Nathaniel Jembere2, Joan Murphy3,4,5, Rachel Kupets3,4,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine factors associated with the development of cervical malignancy among women participating in an organized cervical screening program.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study was performed examining the screening histories 2 to 10 years before diagnosis of invasive cancer in Ontario women between 2011 and 2014.
RESULTS: A total of 2,002 cases of cervical cancer were identified; 1,358 (68%) were squamous cell carcinomas and 644 (32%) were adenocarcinomas. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 50.3 years. More than 60% of the cohort had at least 1 cytology test within 2 to 10 years of their diagnosis. Of the women having a cytology result 24 to 36 months before diagnosis, 69% had a normal cytology whereas only 7% had a high-grade cytology result. Stage of cancer was most advanced in women who did not have cytology in the 2 to 10 years before their diagnosis. On multivariate regression, those with cervical cancer who were less likely to have undergone screening include older age, advanced stage, lower income, not having a family physician, and those diagnosed with adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Although nonparticipation in screening is the greatest factor associated with cervical cancer diagnosis, failure of cervical cytology to detect cytologic abnormalities in women 2 to 3 and 3 to 5 years before diagnosis is of concern. Efforts must be directed to recruitment of women for screening as well as improving the sensitivity of screening tests to detect existing abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30489433     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  3 in total

1.  To what extent do age, stage and treatment influence survival after invasive cervical cancer: a French population-based study.

Authors:  Zoéwendtalé Cyrille Compaoré; Elisabeth Monnet; Aurélie Gérazime; Florence Molinié; Anne-Valérie Guizard; Patricia Delafosse; Tienhan Sandrine Dabakuyo-Yonli; Gaëlle Coureau; Karima Hammas; Sandrine Plouvier; Simona Bara; Gautier Défossez; Bénédicte Lapôtre-Ledoux; Laetitia Daubisse-Marliac; Tania d'Almeida; Guy Launoy; Laura Mansi; Brigitte Trétarre; Anne-Sophie Woronoff
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Highlighting strengths and resources that increase ownership of cervical cancer screening for Indigenous communities in Northern British Columbia: Community-driven approaches.

Authors:  Alexanne Dick; Travis Holyk; Darlene Taylor; Charlotte Wenninger; Judith Sandford; Laurie Smith; Gina Ogilvie; Alexandra Thomlinson; Sheona Mitchell-Foster
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 4.447

3.  Building on existing tools to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in public health: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  A K Lofters; M A O'Brien; R Sutradhar; A D Pinto; N N Baxter; P Donnelly; R Elliott; R H Glazier; J Huizinga; R Kyle; D M Manca; M A Pietrusiak; L Rabeneck; B Riordan; P Selby; K Sivayoganathan; C Snider; N Sopcak; K Thorpe; J Tinmouth; B Wall; F Zuo; E Grunfeld; L Paszat
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.