Qiuxiang Zhang1, Heng Zhao1, Yaning Zheng2. 1. Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China. 2. Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China. iamyaning@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in breast cancer patients. METHODS: A systematic search of Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO database, Web of science, Medline, EMBASE, CNKI, and CBM database was carried out from February to May 2018, with no language restrictions. Trials examining the effects of MBSR versus control group on symptom variables and health-related quality of life were included. Data concerning studies, patient characteristics, and outcomes were extracted. Methodological quality of each included randomized controlled trials were assessed individually by two reviewers independently using criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0. Meanwhile, Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate methodological quality of non-randomized studies. RESULTS: In all, 14 studies involving 1505 participants were included. Due to the effect of MBSR, statistically significant results were found on physiological function (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI [0.07, 0.049], P = 0.008), cognitive function (SMD = 1.48, 95% CI [0.34, 2.61], P = 0.01), fatigue (SMD = - 0.66, 95% CI [- 1.11, - 0.20], P = 0.004), emotional wellbeing (SMD = 1.01, 95% CI [0.35, 1.67], P = 0.003), anxiety (SMD = - 0.54, 95% CI [- 1.01, - 0.07], P = 0.02), depression (SMD = - 0.61, 95% CI [- 1.11, - 0.11], P = 0.02), stress (SMD = - 0.48, 95% CI [- 0.81, - 0.15], P = 0.004), distress (SMD = - 0.56, 95% CI [- 0.85, - 0.26], P = 0.0002) and mindfulness (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI [0.10, 1.79], P = 0.03). Although the effects on pain, sleep quality, and global QoL were in the expected direction, they were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) based on insufficient evidence. CONCLUSIONS: MBSR is worthy of being recommended to breast cancer patients as a complementary treatment or adjunctive therapy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) in breast cancerpatients. METHODS: A systematic search of Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO database, Web of science, Medline, EMBASE, CNKI, and CBM database was carried out from February to May 2018, with no language restrictions. Trials examining the effects of MBSR versus control group on symptom variables and health-related quality of life were included. Data concerning studies, patient characteristics, and outcomes were extracted. Methodological quality of each included randomized controlled trials were assessed individually by two reviewers independently using criteria recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0. Meanwhile, Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate methodological quality of non-randomized studies. RESULTS: In all, 14 studies involving 1505 participants were included. Due to the effect of MBSR, statistically significant results were found on physiological function (SMD = 0.28, 95% CI [0.07, 0.049], P = 0.008), cognitive function (SMD = 1.48, 95% CI [0.34, 2.61], P = 0.01), fatigue (SMD = - 0.66, 95% CI [- 1.11, - 0.20], P = 0.004), emotional wellbeing (SMD = 1.01, 95% CI [0.35, 1.67], P = 0.003), anxiety (SMD = - 0.54, 95% CI [- 1.01, - 0.07], P = 0.02), depression (SMD = - 0.61, 95% CI [- 1.11, - 0.11], P = 0.02), stress (SMD = - 0.48, 95% CI [- 0.81, - 0.15], P = 0.004), distress (SMD = - 0.56, 95% CI [- 0.85, - 0.26], P = 0.0002) and mindfulness (SMD = 0.94, 95% CI [0.10, 1.79], P = 0.03). Although the effects on pain, sleep quality, and global QoL were in the expected direction, they were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) based on insufficient evidence. CONCLUSIONS: MBSR is worthy of being recommended to breast cancerpatients as a complementary treatment or adjunctive therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Health-related quality of life; Meta-analysis; Mindfulness-based stress reduction
Authors: Kelly Chinh; Ekin Secinti; Shelley A Johns; Adam T Hirsh; Kathy D Miller; Bryan Schneider; Anna Maria Storniolo; Lida Mina; Erin V Newton; Victoria L Champion; Catherine E Mosher Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2020-11-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Gwen Wyatt; Rebecca Lehto; Pratim Guha-Niyogi; Sarah Brewer; David Victorson; Thaddeus Pace; Terry Badger; Alla Sikorskii Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Kelly Chinh; Catherine E Mosher; Linda F Brown; Kathleen A Beck-Coon; Kurt Kroenke; Shelley A Johns Journal: Mindfulness (N Y) Date: 2020-01-14
Authors: Shelley A Johns; Will L Tarver; Ekin Secinti; Catherine E Mosher; Patrick V Stutz; Jennifer L Carnahan; Tasneem L Talib; Mackenzie L Shanahan; Micah T Faidley; Kelley M Kidwell; Kevin L Rand Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: William R Nardi; Eric B Loucks; Stacey Springs; Don Operario; Ian M Kronish; Brandon A Gaudiano; Shufang Sun Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 4.620