Literature DB >> 30487259

More partners, more ranges: generalist legumes spread more easily around the globe.

Tia L Harrison1, Anna K Simonsen2, John R Stinchcombe3, Megan E Frederickson3.   

Abstract

How does mutualism affect range expansion? On the one hand, mutualists might thrive in new habitats thanks to the resources, stress tolerance or defence provided by their partners. On the other, specialized mutualists might fail to find compatible partners beyond their range margins, limiting further spread. A recent global analysis of legume ranges found that non-symbiotic legumes have been successfully introduced to more ranges than legumes that form symbioses with rhizobia, but there is still abundant unexplained variation in introduction success within symbiotic legumes. We test the hypothesis that generalist legumes have spread to more ranges than specialist legumes. We used published data and rhizobial 16S rRNA sequences from GenBank to quantify the number of rhizobia partners that associate with 159 legume species, spanning the legume phylogeny and the globe. We found that generalist legumes occur in more introduced ranges than specialist legumes, suggesting that among mutualists, specialization hinders range expansions.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Keywords:  generalist; legumes; mutualism; range expansion; rhizobia; specialist

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30487259      PMCID: PMC6283934          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  13 in total

1.  A single ectomycorrhizal fungal species can enable a Pinus invasion.

Authors:  Jeremy Hayward; Thomas R Horton; Aníbal Pauchard; Martin A Nuñnez
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 2.  Soil biota and invasive plants.

Authors:  Kurt O Reinhart; Ragan M Callaway
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities.

Authors:  Patrick D Schloss; Sarah L Westcott; Thomas Ryabin; Justine R Hall; Martin Hartmann; Emily B Hollister; Ryan A Lesniewski; Brian B Oakley; Donovan H Parks; Courtney J Robinson; Jason W Sahl; Blaz Stres; Gerhard G Thallinger; David J Van Horn; Carolyn F Weber
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Defense mutualisms enhance plant diversification.

Authors:  Marjorie G Weber; Anurag A Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Legume-rhizobium symbiotic promiscuity and effectiveness do not affect plant invasiveness.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Keet; Allan G Ellis; Cang Hui; Johannes J Le Roux
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  More partners, more ranges: generalist legumes spread more easily around the globe.

Authors:  Tia L Harrison; Anna K Simonsen; John R Stinchcombe; Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Mutualist-mediated effects on species' range limits across large geographic scales.

Authors:  Michelle E Afkhami; Patrick J McIntyre; Sharon Y Strauss
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments.

Authors:  Amy E Zanne; David C Tank; William K Cornwell; Jonathan M Eastman; Stephen A Smith; Richard G FitzJohn; Daniel J McGlinn; Brian C O'Meara; Angela T Moles; Peter B Reich; Dana L Royer; Douglas E Soltis; Peter F Stevens; Mark Westoby; Ian J Wright; Lonnie Aarssen; Robert I Bertin; Andre Calaminus; Rafaël Govaerts; Frank Hemmings; Michelle R Leishman; Jacek Oleksyn; Pamela S Soltis; Nathan G Swenson; Laura Warman; Jeremy M Beaulieu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Differential plant invasiveness is not always driven by host promiscuity with bacterial symbionts.

Authors:  Metha M Klock; Luke G Barrett; Peter H Thrall; Kyle E Harms
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 3.276

Review 10.  Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses.

Authors:  Mitchell Andrews; Morag E Andrews
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  5 in total

1.  More partners, more ranges: generalist legumes spread more easily around the globe.

Authors:  Tia L Harrison; Anna K Simonsen; John R Stinchcombe; Megan E Frederickson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Comparative genomics reveals high rates of horizontal transfer and strong purifying selection on rhizobial symbiosis genes.

Authors:  Brendan Epstein; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Shared mycorrhizae but distinct communities of other root-associated microbes on co-occurring native and invasive maples.

Authors:  Tonia DeBellis; Steven W Kembel; Jean-Philippe Lessard
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Legume germination is delayed in dry soils and in sterile soils devoid of microbial mutualists: Species-specific implications for upward range expansions.

Authors:  Andrea M Keeler; Nicole E Rafferty
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.167

5.  Host-Associated Rhizobial Fitness: Dependence on Nitrogen, Density, Community Complexity, and Legume Genotype.

Authors:  Liana T Burghardt; Brendan Epstein; Michelle Hoge; Diana I Trujillo; Peter Tiffin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.005

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.