| Literature DB >> 30486306 |
Bram de Boer1, Hanneke C Beerens2, Melanie A Katterbach3, Martina Viduka4, Bernadette M Willemse5, Hilde Verbeek6.
Abstract
It is well recognized that the physical environment is important for the well-being of people with dementia. This influences developments within the nursing home care sector where there is an increasing interest in supporting person-centered care by using the physical environment. Innovations in nursing home design often focus on small-scale and homelike care environments. This study investigated: (1) the physical environment of different types of nursing homes, comparing traditional nursing homes with small-scale living facilities and green care farms; and (2) how the physical environment was being used in practice in terms of the location, engagement and social interaction of residents. Two observational studies were carried out. Results indicate that the physical environment of small-scale living facilities for people with dementia has the potential to be beneficial for resident's daily life. However, having a potentially beneficial physical environment did not automatically lead to an optimal use of this environment, as some areas of a nursing home (e.g., outdoor areas) were not utilized. This study emphasizes the importance of nursing staff that provides residents with meaningful activities and stimulates residents to be active and use the physical environment to its full extent.Entities:
Keywords: engagement; green care farms; nursing homes; physical environment/space; small-scale living; social interaction
Year: 2018 PMID: 30486306 PMCID: PMC6315793 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare6040137
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Description of the types of nursing homes.
| Type of Nursing Home | Brief Description | Prominent Characteristics of the Physical Environment |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional nursing home ward | ≥20 residents on the ward | Large building, long corridors, shared rooms, hospital-like atmosphere, separate kitchen, facilities such as a restaurant and activity areas are attached to the ward |
| Small-scale living facility on the area of a larger nursing home | Maximum of 8 residents | Homelike situation, single rooms, familiar interior, common living room attached to kitchen, facilities such as a restaurant and activity areas are attached to the ward, outdoor area accessible |
| Stand-alone small-scale living facility | Has the same characteristics as a small scale living facility on the terrain of a larger nursing home, however situated in a neighborhood | Archetype house, single rooms, familiar interior, common living room attached to kitchen, no direct access to facilities provided at a larger nursing home, outdoor area accessible |
| Green care farms | A type of stand-alone small-scale nursing home facility in a rural area Both care and agricultural activities are important. | Homelike situation, archetype house, single rooms, familiar interior, common living room attached to kitchen, freely accessible outdoor areas, stables, gardens, animals |
OAZIS-Dementia categories and example items.
| Category | Item No. | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Privacy and Autonomy | Item 1–7 | Residents have a single room |
| Sensory Stimulation | Item 8–25 | Daylight glare and harsh reflections are prevented or can be individually regulated with blinds |
| View and Nature | Item 26–36 | Residents have views of nature and greenery |
| Facilities | Item 37–45 | The outdoor area is accessible for people using a wheelchair or walker |
| Orientation and Routing | Item 46–52 | The structure of the ward is open |
| Domesticity/Small Scale | Item 53–69 | The ward has its own front door with a doorbell |
| Safety | Item 70–72 | There are devices dedicated to security present at the toilets |
Scoring options during observations.
| Aspects of MEDLO-Tool | Operationalization | Scoring Options |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement in activity | Five category options | Yes, active engagement (participating in activity) |
| Location | Five category options | Communal area on the ward |
| Level of social interaction | Five category options | No social interaction |
| Type of social interaction of environment towards resident | Five category options | Negative restrictive (interaction that oppose or resist resident’s freedom of action without good reason, or ignore resident as a person) |
| Social interaction with whom | Five category options | Staff |
Scores on the OAZIS-Dementia per type of nursing home.
| OAZIS-Dementia Categories | Traditional Nursing Home Ward (n = 4) | Small-Scale Living Facility on the Terrain of a Larger Nursing Home (n = 6) | Stand-Alone Small-Scale Living Facility (n = 3) | Green Care Farm (n = 5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Privacy and autonomy | 2.8 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Sensory stimulation | 3.5 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 4.2 |
| View and Nature | 2.9 | 3.6 | 3.0 | 4.3 |
| Facilities | 3.6 | 4.2 | 3.3 | 3.7 |
| Orientation and routing | 2.5 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.8 |
| Domesticity | 2.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Safety | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Total | 3.0 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.2 |
Scores on the OAZIS-Dementia per nursing home.
| OAZIS-Dementia Categories | Nursing Home 1 | Nursing Home 2 | Nursing Home 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Privacy and autonomy | 4.9 | 4.3 | 5.0 |
| Sensory stimulation | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.2 |
| View and nature | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.8 |
| Facilities | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.3 |
| Orientation and Routing | 3.6 | 3.9 | 3.3 |
| Domesticity | 4.2 | 3.3 | 3.7 |
| Safety | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.7 |
|
| 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.1 |
Percentages on location, engagement and social interaction.
| Category | Nursing Home 1 | Nursing Home 2 | Nursing Home 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Communal area on the ward | 54% | 78% | 40% |
| Own room | 34% | 9% | 57% | |
| Communal area off the ward | 4% | 9% | 3% | |
| Outside | 8% | 4% | - | |
| Engagement in an activity | 92% | 82% | 87% | |
| Social interaction | 54% | 52% | 37% | |
| Social interaction with whom | Staff | 35% | 37% | 49% |
| Other residents | 29% | 15% | 13% | |
| Family and/or friends | 1% | 5% | 1% | |
| Others | 9% | 12% | 11% | |
| Combination of the above | 26% | 32% | 27% | |
| Type of social interaction | Negative restrictive | 1% | - | - |
| Negative protective | 1% | 1% | 2% | |
| Neutral | 8% | 16% | 24% | |
| Positive care | 39% | 25% | 24% | |
| Positive social | 52% | 59% | 50% | |