BACKGROUND: There is large cross-national variation in the characteristics of small, domestic-style care settings which emphasize normalized living. However, a systematic overview of existing types is lacking. This study provides an international comparison of the care concepts which have adopted a homelike philosophy in a small-scale context. Insight into their characteristics is vital for theory, planning and implementation of such dementia care settings. METHOD: A literature search was performed using various electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, CINAHL and PsycINFO. In addition, "gray" literature was identified on the internet. Concepts were analyzed according to five main characteristics: physical setting, number of residents, residents' characteristics, domestic characteristics and care concept. RESULTS: 75 papers were included covering 11 different concept types in various countries. Similarities among concepts reflected a focus on meaningful activities centered around the daily household. Staff have integrated tasks and are part of the household, and archetypical home-style features, such as kitchens, are incorporated in the buildings. Differences among concepts were found mainly in the physical settings, numbers of residents and residents' characteristics. Some concepts have become regular dementia care settings, while others are smaller initiatives. CONCLUSION: The care concepts are implemented in various ways with a changing staff role. However, many aspects of these small, homelike facilities remain unclear. Future research is needed, focusing on residents' characteristics, family, staff and costs.
BACKGROUND: There is large cross-national variation in the characteristics of small, domestic-style care settings which emphasize normalized living. However, a systematic overview of existing types is lacking. This study provides an international comparison of the care concepts which have adopted a homelike philosophy in a small-scale context. Insight into their characteristics is vital for theory, planning and implementation of such dementia care settings. METHOD: A literature search was performed using various electronic databases, including PubMed, Medline, CINAHL and PsycINFO. In addition, "gray" literature was identified on the internet. Concepts were analyzed according to five main characteristics: physical setting, number of residents, residents' characteristics, domestic characteristics and care concept. RESULTS: 75 papers were included covering 11 different concept types in various countries. Similarities among concepts reflected a focus on meaningful activities centered around the daily household. Staff have integrated tasks and are part of the household, and archetypical home-style features, such as kitchens, are incorporated in the buildings. Differences among concepts were found mainly in the physical settings, numbers of residents and residents' characteristics. Some concepts have become regular dementia care settings, while others are smaller initiatives. CONCLUSION: The care concepts are implemented in various ways with a changing staff role. However, many aspects of these small, homelike facilities remain unclear. Future research is needed, focusing on residents' characteristics, family, staff and costs.
Authors: Sheryl Zimmerman; Barbara J Bowers; Lauren W Cohen; David C Grabowski; Susan D Horn; Peter Kemper Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Susan M McCurry; David M LaFazia; Kenneth C Pike; Rebecca G Logsdon; Linda Teri Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Hilde Verbeek; Sandra M G Zwakhalen; Erik van Rossum; Ton Ambergen; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Jan P H Hamers Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-01-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Karla T Washington; George Demiris; Debra Parker Oliver; Gemille Purnell; Paul Tatum Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2017-09-30 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Johannes Gräske; Hilde Verbeek; Paul Gellert; Thomas Fischer; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Karin Wolf-Ostermann Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Hilde Verbeek; Erik van Rossum; Sandra M G Zwakhalen; Ton Ambergen; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Jan P H Hamers Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 3.921