OBJECTIVE: The Resident Activity Tracker Evaluation (RATE) is a prospective observational study evaluating the impact of work hours, sleep and physical activity on resident well-being, burnout and job satisfaction. BACKGROUND: Physician burnout is common and its incidence is increasing. The impact of work hours and sleep on resident well-being and burnout remains elusive. Activity trackers are an innovative tool for measuring sleep and physical activity. METHODS: Residents were recruited from (i) general surgery and orthopaedics (SURG), (ii) internal medicine and neurology (MED) and (iii) anaesthesia and radiology (RCD). Groups 1 and 2 do not enforce restrictions on the duration of being on-call, and group 3 had restricted the duration of being on-call to 12 hours. Participants wore FitBit trackers for 14 days. Total hours worked, daily sleep, sleep on-call and daily steps were recorded. Participants completed validated surveys assessing self-reported well-being (Short-Form Health Survey), burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory), and satisfaction with medicine. RESULTS: Surgical residents worked the most hours per week, followed by medical and RCD residents (SURG, 84.3 hours, 95% CI, 80.2-88.5; MED, 69.2 hours, 95% CI, 65.3-73.2; RCD, 52.2 hours, 95% CI, 48.2-56.1; p < 0.001). Surgical residents obtained fewer hours of sleep per day (SURG, 5.9 hours, 95% CI, 5.5-6.3; MED, 6.9 hours, 95% CI, 6.5-7.3; RCD, 6.8 hours, 95% CI, 5.6-7.2; p < 0.001). Nearly two-thirds of participants (61%) scored high burnout on the Maslach depersonalisation subscore. Total steps per day and well-being, burnout and job satisfaction were comparable between groups. Total hours worked, daily sleep and steps per day did not predict burnout or well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Work hours and average daily sleep did not affect burnout. Physical activity did not prevent burnout. Work hour restrictions may lead to increased sleep but may not affect resident burnout or well-being.
OBJECTIVE: The Resident Activity Tracker Evaluation (RATE) is a prospective observational study evaluating the impact of work hours, sleep and physical activity on resident well-being, burnout and job satisfaction. BACKGROUND: Physician burnout is common and its incidence is increasing. The impact of work hours and sleep on resident well-being and burnout remains elusive. Activity trackers are an innovative tool for measuring sleep and physical activity. METHODS: Residents were recruited from (i) general surgery and orthopaedics (SURG), (ii) internal medicine and neurology (MED) and (iii) anaesthesia and radiology (RCD). Groups 1 and 2 do not enforce restrictions on the duration of being on-call, and group 3 had restricted the duration of being on-call to 12 hours. Participants wore FitBit trackers for 14 days. Total hours worked, daily sleep, sleep on-call and daily steps were recorded. Participants completed validated surveys assessing self-reported well-being (Short-Form Health Survey), burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory), and satisfaction with medicine. RESULTS: Surgical residents worked the most hours per week, followed by medical and RCD residents (SURG, 84.3 hours, 95% CI, 80.2-88.5; MED, 69.2 hours, 95% CI, 65.3-73.2; RCD, 52.2 hours, 95% CI, 48.2-56.1; p < 0.001). Surgical residents obtained fewer hours of sleep per day (SURG, 5.9 hours, 95% CI, 5.5-6.3; MED, 6.9 hours, 95% CI, 6.5-7.3; RCD, 6.8 hours, 95% CI, 5.6-7.2; p < 0.001). Nearly two-thirds of participants (61%) scored high burnout on the Maslach depersonalisation subscore. Total steps per day and well-being, burnout and job satisfaction were comparable between groups. Total hours worked, daily sleep and steps per day did not predict burnout or well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Work hours and average daily sleep did not affect burnout. Physical activity did not prevent burnout. Work hour restrictions may lead to increased sleep but may not affect resident burnout or well-being.
Authors: Binal S Kancherla; Raghu Upender; Jacob F Collen; Muhammad Adeel Rishi; Shannon S Sullivan; Omer Ahmed; Michael Berneking; Erin E Flynn-Evans; Brandon R Peters; Fariha Abbasi-Feinberg; R Nisha Aurora; Kelly A Carden; Douglas B Kirsch; David A Kristo; Raman K Malhotra; Jennifer L Martin; Eric J Olson; Kannan Ramar; Carol L Rosen; James A Rowley; Anita V Shelgikar; Indira Gurubhagavatula Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-02-28 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Jeffrey T Sakamoto; Justin Lee; Dave W Lu; Vandana Sundaram; Steven B Bird; Andra L Blomkalns; Al'ai Alvarez Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: Danny T Y Wu; Catherine Xu; Abraham Kim; Shwetha Bindhu; Kenneth E Mah; Mark H Eckman Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Geneviève Chartrand; Mikael Soucisse; Pierre Dubé; Jean-Sébastien Trépanier; Pierre Drolet; Lucas Sideris Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Shoham Choshen-Hillel; Ahmad Ishqer; Fadi Mahameed; Joel Reiter; David Gozal; Alex Gileles-Hillel; Itai Berger Journal: Med Educ Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 6.251