Literature DB >> 30484128

Associations between mandibular symphysis form and craniofacial structures.

Yolanda Gómez1, Verónica García-Sanz2, Natalia Zamora1, Beatriz Tarazona1, Carlos Bellot-Arcís1, Erik Langsjoen3, Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) analyze the relationships between mandibular symphysis characteristics (height, prominence, inclination, concavity, and convexity) and facial pattern, skeletal class, lower incisor position, and sex, and (2) determine the associations between the symphysis soft tissue dimensions and the underlying osseous structures.
METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were selected for 385 patients (206 women and 179 men). The patients were classified according to their skeletal class and vertical pattern. The lower incisor inclination (IMPA) was recorded. Twelve measurements were taken for each mandibular symphysis using Invivo5 software (Anatomage, San Jose, CA, USA).
RESULTS: Symphyseal measurements were larger in males than in females. Skeletal Class II and III hyperdivergent patients showed the highest symphysis height values. Hypodivergent individuals showed lower symphysis convexity angles. Concavity of the symphysis was greater for Class II hyperdivergent patients. Lower incisor inclination showed a positive correlation with symphysis concavity and inclination. Moderate and weak correlations were found between hard tissue and soft tissue parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Only a few characteristics of symphysis morphology depend on sex, incisor position, skeletal class, and vertical pattern. More significant relationships are found when the vertical pattern and skeletal class are analyzed in combination. The shape of the symphysis soft tissue is not directly correlated with the underlying skeletal structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chin; Hard tissue; Mandibular symphysis; Soft tissue; facial profile

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 30484128     DOI: 10.1007/s11282-017-0292-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Radiol        ISSN: 0911-6028            Impact factor:   1.852


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults.

Authors:  Yan Gu; James A McNamara; Lauren M Sigler; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations.

Authors:  Liangyan Sun; Lina Zhang; Guofang Shen; Bo Wang; Bing Fang
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  Chiaki Yamada; Noriyuki Kitai; Naoya Kakimoto; Shumei Murakami; Souhei Furukawa; Kenji Takada
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile.

Authors:  R S Nanda; H Meng; S Kapila; J Goorhuis
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning.

Authors:  M Tsunori; M Mashita; K Kasai
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.

Authors:  Leslie Talbert; Chung How Kau; Terpsithea Christou; Christos Vlachos; Nada Souccar
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2014-03

7.  Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.

Authors:  Denise Swasty; Janice Lee; John C Huang; Koutaro Maki; Stuart A Gansky; David Hatcher; Arthur J Miller
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Sliding osteotomy genioplasty for facial aesthetic balance: 10 years of experience.

Authors:  Johannes Franz Hoenig
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.

Authors:  Anthony Tannous Macari; Antoine Elias Hanna
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships.

Authors:  Susan N Al-Khateeb; Emad F Al Maaitah; Elham S Abu Alhaija; Serene A Badran
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  4 in total

1.  Which one closes extraction spaces faster: en masse retraction or two-step retraction? A randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Patricia Pigato Schneider; Ki Beom Kim; André da Costa Monini; Ary Dos Santos-Pinto; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Symphysis morphology and mandibular alveolar bone thickness in patients with β-thalassemia major and different growth patterns.

Authors:  Leila Khojastepour; Atefe Naderi; Fatemeh Akbarizadeh; Najmeh Movahhedian; Farzaneh Ahrari
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Mandibular symphysis dimensions in different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships.

Authors:  Amal I Linjawi; Ahmed R Afify; Hosam A Baeshen; Dowen Birkhed; Khalid H Zawawi
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Comparison of mandibular cross-sectional morphology between Class I and Class II subjects with different vertical patterns: based on CBCT images and statistical shape analysis.

Authors:  Haotian Chen; Zijin Liu; Xinnong Hu; Ben Wu; Yan Gu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.