Literature DB >> 24671286

A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.

Leslie Talbert1, Chung How Kau, Terpsithea Christou, Christos Vlachos, Nada Souccar.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare facial morphologies of an adult African-American population to an adult Caucasian-American population using three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The images were captured using a stereophotogrammetric system (3dMDface(TM) system). Subjects were aged 19-30 years, with normal body mass index and no gross craniofacial anomalies. Images were aligned and combined using RF6 Plus Pack 2 software to produce a male and female facial average for each population. The averages were superimposed and the differences were assessed.
RESULTS: The most distinct differences were in the forehead, alar base and perioricular regions. The average difference between African-American and Caucasian-American females was 1·18±0·98 mm. The African-American females had a broader face, wider alar base and more protrusive lips. The Caucasian-American females had a more prominent chin, malar region and lower forehead. The average difference between African-American and Caucasian-American males was 1·11±1·04 mm. The African-American males had a more prominent upper forehead and periocular region, wider alar base and more protrusive lips. No notable difference occurred between chin points of the two male populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Average faces were created from 3D photographs, and the facial morphological differences between populations and genders were compared. African-American males had a more prominent upper forehead and periocular region, wider alar base and more protrusive lips. Caucasian-American males showed a more prominent nasal tip and malar area. African-American females had broader face, wider alar base and more protrusive lips. Caucasian-American females showed a more prominent chin point, malar region and lower forehead.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D; African-American; Caucasian-American; Facial morphology; orthodontics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24671286     DOI: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN: 1465-3125


  6 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Adult Facial Three-Dimensional Morphology: Application to Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery.

Authors:  Jordan J Bannister; Hailey Juszczak; Jose David Aponte; David C Katz; P Daniel Knott; Seth M Weinberg; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Nils D Forkert; Rahul Seth
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med       Date:  2022-03-29

2.  Associations between mandibular symphysis form and craniofacial structures.

Authors:  Yolanda Gómez; Verónica García-Sanz; Natalia Zamora; Beatriz Tarazona; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; Erik Langsjoen; Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 1.852

3.  A comprehensive clinical and genetic study in 127 patients with ID in Kinshasa, DR Congo.

Authors:  Aimé Lumaka; Valerie Race; Hilde Peeters; Anniek Corveleyn; Zeynep Coban-Akdemir; Shalini N Jhangiani; Xiaofei Song; Gerrye Mubungu; Jennifer Posey; James R Lupski; Joris R Vermeesch; Prosper Lukusa; Koenraad Devriendt
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Facial and body sexual dimorphism are not interconnected in the Maasai.

Authors:  Marina L Butovskaya; Victoria V Rostovtseva; Anna A Mezentseva
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.867

5.  Three-dimensional Analysis of Normal Facial Morphologies of Asians and Whites: A Novel Method of Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Jamie Y Kim; Chung H Kau; Terpsithea Christou; Maja Ovsenik; Young Guk Park
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-09-20

6.  A Cross-Sectional Study to Understand 3D Facial Differences in a Population of African Americans and Caucasians.

Authors:  Chung H Kau; Jue Wang; Matthew Davis
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.