Literature DB >> 30483374

Prevalence of dengue and leptospirosis co-infection in a tertiary care hospital in south India.

Arun Sachu1, Anitha Madhavan1, Anu Vasudevan2, Jayalakshmi Vasudevapanicker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dengue and Leptospirosis were often discussed separately with rash being more common in dengue and jaundice in leptospirosis. But with increasing reports of co-infection, the situation has become worse. The main objective of this study was to look for the presence of both Dengue and Leptospira IgM antibodies in serum samples of patients, presenting with acute febrile illness. Medical records of the co-infected patients were examined to analyse the clinical features and laboratory findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum samples of patients presenting with acute febrile illness were screened for the presence of Dengue IgM antibodies and Leptospira antibodies. Clinical features and laboratory parameters of patients with co-infection were compared with patients having dengue alone. Rainfall data was obtained to look for an association between rainfall and Dengue, leptospirosis and co-infected cases.
RESULTS: Co-infection was seen in 33 (3.4%) samples. There was a statistically significant association between clinical features like rashes, bleeding gums and co-infection. There was a statistically significant association between various laboratory parameters like thrombocytopenia and co-infection. There was positive correlation between rainfall and development of dengue, leptospirosis, and co-infection but it was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of co-infection was 3.4%. This study re-emphasizes the fact that dengue and leptospirosis are widely prevalent in south India and clinicians should be aware that co-infection with dengue and leptospirosis is not uncommon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-infection; Dengue; Leptospirosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30483374      PMCID: PMC6243148     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Microbiol        ISSN: 2008-3289


INTRODUCTION

Dengue fever is one of the most prevalent arboviral disease in the world and can be caused by any of the four serotypes of the virus (1). The virus is widespread in the tropical and subtropical areas. The 1st epidemic of dengue in India was reported from Kolkata (1963–1964) and since then the epidemiology of the virus has been changing. Leptospirosis is a zoonosis caused by pathogenic Leptospira species (2). The annual incidence of leptospirosis ranges from 0.1–1.0 per 100,000 in temperate regions to 10–100/100,000 in humid regions (WHO, Human leptospirosis, 2003). Dengue is the 10th leading cause of death worldwide with approximately 40% of the world population living in areas at risk for developing dengue. The incidence of both diseases is seen to peak in the monsoon and post monsoon periods. Both the diseases can present as mild febrile illness. While leptospirosis can present in a severe form (Weils disease) with jaundice and organ dysfunction, Dengue can lead to Dengue Haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and Dengue shock syndrome (DSS) (3). Both of these diseases were often discussed separately with rash being more common in dengue and jaundice being predominant in leptospirosis. But with increasing reports of co-infection, the situation has become worse. The vast overlapping spectrum of signs and symptoms of dengue and leptospirosis makes the clinical diagnosis challenging for treating physicians when the co-infection presents in acute form. It is important to differentiate these two diseases because early antibiotic therapy is crucial in leptospirosis, whereas dengue is treated symptomatically. Increased awareness about the presence of co-infection is necessary, so that a high index of suspicion is maintained and for early diagnosis. The most common method used for the diagnosis of Dengue in most laboratories is a Dengue IgM ELISA and also an Immunochromatograhic assay for the detection of NS1 antigen. RT-PCR, although an excellent method, is not available in most laboratories (4). The Gold standard method for the diagnosis of leptospirosis is a Microscopic Agglutination test (MAT) but it is time consuming and requires the use of live leptospira species cultures. IgM ELISA is used in most laboratories for the diagnosis of leptospirosis (5). The main objective of the study was to look for the presence of both Dengue and Leptospira IgM antibodies in serum samples of patients, presenting with acute febrile illness. Medical records of the co-infected patients were examined to find the clinical features and laboratory findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective hospital based study conducted between January 2016 and December 2016. The target population consisted of patients among all age groups reporting with acute febrile illness (AFI) at Government TD medical college, Alleppey. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Institute. Serum samples of patients presenting with acute febrile illness were screened for the presence of Dengue IgM antibodies by using the Panbio IgM antibody capture ELISA (MAC ELISA) and Leptospira antibodies by using the SD Elisa Kit in the Microbiology department of Government TD medical college, Alleppey. Exclusion criteria included samples negative for dengue and leptospira IgM and those with equivocal results. Co-infection was defined as patients whose serum samples were positive for both dengue and leptospira IgM. One-hundred age and sex matched patients with isolated dengue fever were analysed. Clinical features and laboratory parameters were determined and compared with patients having co-infection. Rainfall data from January 2016 to December 2016 were obtained from the Indian Meteorological department to look for an association between rainfall and dengue, leptospirosis and co-infected cases over the study period.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS 20. (SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA). For all the continuous variables, the results are either given in Mean ± SD, and for categorical variables as percentage. To obtain the association of categorical variables, chi square test was applied. To obtain the relationship between two variables, Pearsons correlation was applied. A P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A Total of 1280 and 1116 samples were tested for dengue and leptopsira ELISA respectively during the study period. A Total of 974 samples were tested for co-infection. Leptospira IgM was positive in 193 (17.3%) samples and Dengue IgM was positive in 350 (27.3%) samples. As per the definition, co-infection was seen in 33 (3.4%) samples.

Analysis of co-infection cases.

Among the 33 co-infected cases 18 (54.5%) were males and 15 (45.5%) were females. Mean age of the co-infected cases were 37.4 years. Among the 33 co-infection cases, only one (3%) expired and death was due to multi organ dysfunction. Association between various clinical features and co-infection were analysed and tabulated in Table 1.
Table 1.

Association of clinical parameters with dengue and leptospirosis co-infection

Clinical featuresDengue alone (n=100)Co-infection (n=33)p Value
Arthralgia19 (19)7 (21.2)0.78
Vomiting26 (26)14 (42.4)0.07
Abdominal Pain16 (16)10 (30.3)0.131
Retro-orbital Pain24 (24)3 (9.1)0.061
Bleeding Gums1 (1)5 (15.2)<0.001
Rashes3 (3)6 (18.2)0.002
Hepatitis5 (5)0 (0)0.19
Lethargy14 (14)8 (24.2)0.169

All parameters are presented as numbers (%).

Association of clinical parameters with dengue and leptospirosis co-infection All parameters are presented as numbers (%). We compared the laboratory parameters among patients with co-infection and patients with dengue alone (Table 2).
Table 2.

Association of laboratory parameters with dengue and leptospirosis co-infection

ParametersDengue alone (n=100)Co-infection (n=33)p Value
Leucocytosis (>10,000)4 (4)6 (18.2)<0.001
Thrombocytopenia (<100,000)43 (43)24 (72.7)0.003
Elevated ALP (>126)6 (6)10 (30.3)<0.001
Elevated ESR (>25)5 (5)9 (27.3)<0.001
Elevated Creatinine (>2)1 (1)5 (15.2)<0.001
Albuminuria3 (3)10 (30.3)<0.001
Haematuria2 (2)7 (21.2)<0.001
ElevatedALT (>47)40 (40)20 (60.6)0.039
Elevated AST (>53)53 (53)15 (45.5)0.452

ALP-Alkaline Phosphatase, AST-Aspartate transaminase, ALT-Alanine transaminase, ESR-Erythrocyte sedimentation rate. All parameters are presented as numbers (%).

Association of laboratory parameters with dengue and leptospirosis co-infection ALP-Alkaline Phosphatase, AST-Aspartate transaminase, ALT-Alanine transaminase, ESR-Erythrocyte sedimentation rate. All parameters are presented as numbers (%).

Association between dengue, leptospirosis, co-infection and rainfall.

The distribution of rainfall in Alleppey for the year 2016 is given in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Distribution of rainfall

Distribution of rainfall The rainfall data from January to December 2016 collected from meteorological department show that highest rainfall was recorded from May to October 2016. Maximum number of dengue and co-infection cases were seen from May to October, while cases of leptospirosis were commonly seen from April to October (Fig. 2). There was positive correlation between rainfall and development of dengue, leptospirosis, and co-infection but it was not statistically significant.
Fig. 2.

Distribution of dengue, leptospirosis and co-infection cases

Distribution of dengue, leptospirosis and co-infection cases

DISCUSSION

Dengue and leptospirosis are both infectious diseases that have a widespread distribution especially in tropical and subtropical regions (6). They occur more commonly in the rainy season. Dengue is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes mainly A. aegypti and A. albopictus (7). Leptospirosis is transmitted mainly by stagnant water containing rodent urine coming into contact with breaks in the skin (8). Detection of leptospira IgM antibody is useful for diagnosis of new infections within 3–5 days of onset of symptoms. Diagnosis of most cases require acute and convalescent testing. Many cases of dengue may be misdiagnosed as a result of inaccurate assessment of disease presentation. Problems of false positivity and false negativity may occur in dengue diagnosis. A positive IgM antibody in late acute or convalescent phase is diagnostic for dengue (9). Alleppey is the smallest district in Kerala with a very high population density. It is a picturesque town with canals and backwaters which makes it a perfect breeding environment for mosquitoes and rodents. Alleppey experiences a long monsoon season with heavy showers from June to November. According to the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme (NVBDCP), Tamil Nadu followed by Kerala has accounted for the maximum cases of dengue in the year 2017. Kerala, in fact has seen an alarming rise in the number of dengue cases in 2017 when compared to 2016. Leptospirosis and dengue are common in regions with poor socio-economic conditions. Vast amount of garbage and overflow of wastewater in Alleppey district, attract mosquitoes and rodents, which can in turn spread infections like dengue and leptospirosis (10, 11). Studies have shown that it is difficult to differentiate leptospirosis from dengue and that leptospirosis is often underdiagnosed in the endemic areas (12). The emergence of co-infection has made the situation even more complicated. This study found serological evidence of co-infection in 3.4% of the samples tested. Studies around the world have reported co-infection ranging from as low as 1.3% to as high as 17.5% (13–16). Kumar et al. reported a mean age of 38 years among the co-infection cases, which is concordant with the findings in our study (14). In this study among the 33 co-infection cases, there was no male predominance. This is discordant with the findings of Suppiah et al. who reported that males are more likely to develop co-infection (17). According to Suppiah et al. there was a statistically significant association between shock and development of co-infection. This was discordant with the findings in our study where there was a statistically significant association between rashes, bleeding gums, leucocytosis, thrombocytopenia, elevated ALT, elevated ALP, elevated ESR, elevated creatinine, albuminuria, haematuria and development of co-infection. Shock was not a significant parameter in our study. Thrombocytopenia which is a predominant finding in dengue fever, was seen in 72.7% of the co-infection cases. Kumar et al. also reported thrombocytopenia among 64.7% of the co-infection cases (14). Deranged hepatic function was seen among the co-infection cases. Despite serological evidence of co-infection, the mortality in our study was very low (3%). Studies have shown conflicting mortality rates among co-infected cases. Sharma et al. reported a high mortality among co-infected cases (12.69%) (3). Ananthi et al. in her study found that all the patients with co-infection survived (18). Pan Bio IgM ELISA, SD ELISA were used for dengue and leptospirosis, which have shown sensitivity of 85.6% and 70% respectively in other studies (19, 20). If antibiotics are used to treat leptospirosis, they should be initiated as soon as the diagnosis despite initial serologic results. All the co-infected cases in our study were treated with intravenous crystalline penicillin and fluid resuscitation. A Cochrane review found insufficient evidence to advocate for or against the use of antibiotics in the therapy for leptospirosis (21). Early treatment has been shown to offer the best clinical outcomes. Severe cases can lead to multiorgan failure. Supportive therapy and careful management of renal, hepatic, hematologic and central nervous system complications are important. Dengue fever is typically a self limited disease with a mortality rate of less than 1% when detected early and with access to proper medical care. When treated, severe form of dengue has a mortality rate of 2–5%, but when left untreated, the mortality rate is as high as 20%. Symptomatic and supportive treatment is usually the basic effective management for patients with dengue (22). In this study we found a positive correlation between rainfall and prevalence of dengue, leptospirosis and co-infection. Similar positive correlation has been found in other studies (23–25). It is important to take into account other factors that affect the transmission of these infections, like relative humidity and temperature, before concluding that rainfall is the reason for the increased transmission of these infections.

CONCLUSION

The overall prevalence of co-infection of dengue and leptospirosis was 3.4%. There was a statistically significant association between clinical features like rashes, bleeding gums and co-infection. There was a statistically significant association between various laboratory parameters like thrombocytopenia and co-infection. There was positive correlation between rainfall and development of dengue, leptospirosis, and co-infection but it was not statistically significant. This study re-emphasizes the fact that dengue and leptospirosis are widely prevalent in south India and clinicians should be aware that co-infection with dengue and leptospirosis is not uncommon.
  18 in total

1.  Mixed infection due to leptospira and dengue.

Authors:  Harjeet Kaur; Mary John
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct

2.  Relation of rainfall pattern and epidemic leptospirosis in the Indian state of Kerala.

Authors:  M J Pappachan; M Sheela; K P Aravindan
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Leptospirosis among patients presenting with dengue-like illness in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Michael G Bruce; E J Sanders; J A D Leake; O Zaidel; S L Bragg; T Aye; K A Shutt; C C Deseda; J G Rigau-Perez; J W Tappero; B A Perkins; R A Spiegel; D A Ashford
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.112

4.  Leptospirosis: experience at a tertiary care hospital in northern India.

Authors:  D Deodhar; M John
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.537

5.  Diagnosis of Leptospirosis: Comparison between Microscopic Agglutination Test, IgM-ELISA and IgM Rapid Immunochromatography Test.

Authors:  Roshan Niloofa; Narmada Fernando; Nipun Lakshitha de Silva; Lilani Karunanayake; Hasith Wickramasinghe; Nandana Dikmadugoda; Gayani Premawansa; Rajitha Wickramasinghe; H Janaka de Silva; Sunil Premawansa; Senaka Rajapakse; Shiroma Handunnetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Natural vertical transmission of dengue virus in Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Kerala, a southern Indian state.

Authors:  Velayutham Thenmozhi; Joghee Gowder Hiriyan; Satish Chandra Tewari; Paulraj Philip Samuel; Rajaiah Paramasivan; Rathinasamy Rajendran; Tiruchengode Ramasamy Mani; Brij Kishore Tyagi
Journal:  Jpn J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.362

Review 7.  Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever: management issues in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sunit Singhi; Niranjan Kissoon; Arun Bansal
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.197

8.  Evaluation of the Standard Diagnostics Leptospira IgM ELISA for diagnosis of acute leptospirosis in Lao PDR.

Authors:  Ampai Tanganuchitcharnchai; Lee Smythe; Michael Dohnt; Rudy Hartskeerl; Manivanh Vongsouvath; Viengmone Davong; Olay Lattana; Paul N Newton; Stuart D Blacksell
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 2.184

9.  Effect of temperature, relative humidity and rainfall on dengue fever and leptospirosis infections in Manila, the Philippines.

Authors:  A Sumi; E F O Telan; H Chagan-Yasutan; M B Piolo; T Hattori; N Kobayashi
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  The prevalence and endemic nature of dengue infections in Guangdong, South China: an epidemiological, serological, and etiological study from 2005-2011.

Authors:  Ru-Ning Guo; Jin-Yan Lin; Lin-Hui Li; Chang-Wen Ke; Jian-Feng He; Hao-Jie Zhong; Hui-Qiong Zhou; Zhi-Qiang Peng; Fen Yang; Wen-Jia Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Leptospirosis in febrile patients with suspected diagnosis of dengue fever.

Authors:  Juana Del Valle-Mendoza; Carlos Palomares-Reyes; Yordi Tarazona-Castro; Hugo Carrillo-Ng; Sungmin Kym; Miguel Angel Aguilar-Luis; Luis J Del Valle; Ronald Aquino-Ortega; Johanna Martins-Luna; Isaac Peña-Tuesta; Eduardo Verne; Wilmer Silva-Caso
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-05-29

Review 2.  Leptospiral Infection, Pathogenesis and Its Diagnosis-A Review.

Authors:  Antony V Samrot; Tan Chuan Sean; Karanam Sai Bhavya; Chamarthy Sai Sahithya; SaiPriya Chan-Drasekaran; Raji Palanisamy; Emilin Renitta Robinson; Suresh Kumar Subbiah; Pooi Ling Mok
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-02-01

3.  Leptospira interrogans  and Leptospira kirschneri are the dominant Leptospira species causing human leptospirosis in Central Malaysia.

Authors:  Noraini Philip; Norliza Bahtiar Affendy; Siti Nur Alia Ramli; Muhamad Arif; Pappitha Raja; Elanngovan Nagandran; Pukunan Renganathan; Niazlin Mohd Taib; Siti Norbaya Masri; Muhamad Yazli Yuhana; Leslie Thian Lung Than; Mithra Seganathirajah; Cyrille Goarant; Marga G A Goris; Zamberi Sekawi; Vasantha Kumari Neela
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-03-23

4.  Usefulness of C-Reactive Protein in Differentiating Acute Leptospirosis and Dengue Fever in French Guiana.

Authors:  Paul Le Turnier; Timothée Bonifay; Emilie Mosnier; Roxane Schaub; Anne Jolivet; Magalie Demar; Pascale Bourhy; Mathieu Nacher; Félix Djossou; Loïc Epelboin
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.835

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.