| Literature DB >> 30483294 |
Ana Rivera1, Marçal Plans2, Josep Sabaté1,3, Francesc Casañas1, Joan Casals1,3, Aurora Rull1,3, Joan Simó1,3.
Abstract
The Iberian Peninsula is considered as a secondary center of diversity for the common bean, and the Spanish National Plant Genetic Resources Centre's germplasm bank holds more than 3,000 Spanish accessions of Phaseolus vulgaris L. from which a core collection of 202 landraces has been selected. In order to encourage the use of this abundant resource, this study aimed to characterize genetic diversity, by measuring chemical composition in these core collections (in both the seed coat and cotyledon) using previously developed near infrared spectroscopy models. Crucially, these landraces in question all originated under similar agroclimatic conditions, allowing these field trials to be conducted in a single location without significantly altering the agronomic behavior of individual accessions. Using previously reported data, we also explored the correlations between chemical composition and culinary/sensory traits, as well as possible associations between chemical composition and seed coat color or gene pool (Middle American or Andean). The general Mahalanobis distance was >3 in only 11 of 1,950 estimations, confirming the robustness of the regression models previously developed. Variability was greater in seed coat than in cotyledon compounds and ranges for all compounds were wide: ash 34-94 g/kg, Ca 5-31 g/kg, dietary fiber 554-911 g/kg, Mg 2-4.4 g/kg, uronic acid 95-155 g/kg, protein 192-304 g/kg, starch 339-446 g/kg, amylose 208-291 g/kg, amylopectin 333-482 g/kg, and apparent amylose 241-332 g/kg. Accessions with white seed coats tended to be richer in ash, dietary fiber, uronic acid, and Ca, and accessions of the Middle American gene pool had on average 65% more Ca than the Andean gene pool. Strong genetic correlations were not identified between chemical and culinary/sensory traits. This is particularly positive with regards to plant breeding, as it means that synchronic improvement of nutritional composition and sensory traits is possible. The genetic diversity of chemical composition described in the Spanish core collection of beans therefore represents a promising opportunity to develop cultivars with superior nutritional profiles.Entities:
Keywords: Phaseolus vulgaris; common bean; diversity; gene pool; genebanks; nutrient composition; protein concentration; seed color
Year: 2018 PMID: 30483294 PMCID: PMC6243110 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Photograph showing the variety of shapes and colors represented in the Spanish core collection of beans.
Variability for the chemical compounds analyzed in the cotyledon and in the seed coat in the Spanish bean core collection of beans.
| Cotyledon components | Seed coat components | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | Starch | Amylose | Amylopectin | Apparent | Ashes | Ca | Dietary | Mg | Uronic | |
| amylose | fiber | acids | ||||||||
| Mean | 232.48 | 396.05 | 263.01 | 407.26 | 295.71 | 53.08 | 13.02 | 710.06 | 2.64 | 122.53 |
| SD | 25.49 | 21.19 | 22.60 | 35.42 | 18.30 | 11.32 | 5.09 | 72.36 | 0.42 | 10.18 |
| SEM | 1.83 | 1.52 | 1.62 | 2.54 | 1.31 | 0.81 | 0.36 | 5.18 | 0.03 | 0.73 |
| Minimum | 192.38 | 339.64 | 208.00 | 333.67 | 241.33 | 34.26 | 5.15 | 554.49 | 1.97 | 95.43 |
| Maximum | 304.24 | 446.53 | 291.00 | 482.00 | 332.81 | 94.27 | 30.74 | 911.22 | 4.47 | 154.77 |
| CV | 10.97 | 5.35 | 8.59 | 8.70 | 6.19 | 21.33 | 39.07 | 10.19 | 15.99 | 8.31 |
Genotypic correlations (Pearson coefficient with Bonferroni correction) between chemical composition traits measured in the cotyledon and seed coat, and sensory and culinary traits measured in a previous study (Rivera et al., 2016) using the same samples.
| Protein | Starch | Amylose | Amylopectin | Apparent | Ashes | Ca | Dietary | Mg | Uronic | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| amylose | fiber | acids | ||||||||
| Seed coat brightness | –0.08 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.52*** | 0.47*** | 0.43*** | 0.22 | 0.46*** |
| Seed coat roughness | 0.14 | –0.3* | –0.11 | –0.03 | –0.05 | 0.37*** | 0.38*** | 0.22 | 0.2 | 0.25 |
| Seed coat perception | –0.15 | 0.27 | 0.21 | –0.02 | 0.32** | –0.29 | –0.28 | –0.19 | 0.01 | –0.11 |
| Mealiness | –0.06 | 0.2 | 0.09 | –0.11 | 0.09 | –0.62*** | –0.57*** | –0.42*** | –0.15 | –0.47*** |
| Flavor | –0.03 | 0.26 | 0.21 | –0.12 | 0.22 | –0.35** | –0.3* | –0.18 | –0.03 | –0.16 |
| Aroma | –0.07 | 0.37*** | 0.28 | –0.12 | 0.23 | –0.35** | –0.33** | –0.26 | –0.01 | –0.13 |
| Rate of water absorption | 0.04 | –0.11 | –0.07 | 0.06 | –0.09 | 0.39*** | 0.36*** | 0.33** | 0 | 0.3* |
| Water absorption during cooking (%) | 0.21 | –0.11 | –0.02 | –0.12 | –0.03 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.17 |
| Cooking time (min) | 0.33** | –0.14 | –0.09 | –0.13 | –0.04 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0 |
| Whole beans (%) | 0.09 | –0.11 | –0.04 | 0.01 | –0.24 | –0.21 | –0.2 | 0.06 | –0.06 | –0.11 |
| White surface color (%) | 0.05 | –0.03 | –0.02 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.57*** | 0.52*** | 0.47*** | 0.33*** | 0.53*** |
| 100 seed weight (g) | –0.06 | 0.13 | 0.09 | –0.09 | 0.07 | –0.34** | –0.37*** | 0.03 | 0 | 0.01 |
| Protein | –0.6*** | –0.37*** | –0.22 | –0.34** | 0.05 | 0.08 | –0.09 | 0.1 | –0.15 | |
| Starch | 0.5*** | 0.24 | 0.44*** | –0.13 | –0.1 | 0.03 | –0.16 | –0.04 | ||
| Amylose | 0.33* | 0.69*** | –0.08 | –0.02 | –0.06 | –0.03 | –0.13 | |||
| Amylopectin | 0.33** | 0.09 | 0.07 | –0.03 | –0.02 | –0.05 | ||||
| Apparent amylose | –0.01 | 0.06 | –0.21 | 0.02 | ||||||
| Ashes | 0.91*** | 0.27 | 0.09 | 0.35** | ||||||
| Ca | 0.2 | 0 | 0.21 | |||||||
| Dietary fiber | 0.06 | 0.42*** | ||||||||
| Mg | 0.25 |
Analysis of variance to compare the levels of the different chemical components measured in the cotyledon and seed coat according to seed coat color classification proposed in Rivera et al. (2016).
| Cotyledon components | Seed coat components | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | Starch | Amylose | Amylopectin | Apparent | Ashes | Ca | Dietary | Mg | Uronic | |
| amylose | fiber | acids | ||||||||
| Significance | ns | ∗∗ | ns | ns | ns | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| White seeds | 236.10 | 387.87 | 256.50 | 405.90 | 293.10 | 65.71 | 17.84 | 774.51 | 2.82 | 131.30 |
| Colored seeds | 229.80 | 399.46 | 264.60 | 406.48 | 296.63 | 50.61 | 11.91 | 696.47 | 2.59 | 120.34 |
FIGURE 2Principal component analysis based on chemical composition of the seed coat and cotyledon. Accessions with white seeds are represented with green symbols and accessions with colored seeds are represented with red symbols. The dashed lines represent the 95% confidence ellipses.
Analysis of variance comparing the content of the different analytes studied according to the gene pool classification reported by PérezVega et al. (2009).
| Cotyledon components | Seed coat components | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | Starch | Amylose | Amylopectin | Apparent | Ashes | Ca | Dietary | Mg | Uronic | |
| amylose | fiber | acids | ||||||||
| Significance | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ns | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ns | ns | ns |
| Middle American | 242.22 | 384.35 | 253.89 | 407.64 | 289.52 | 65.67 | 18.57 | 710.98 | 2.72 | 123.76 |
| Andean | 227.11 | 401.45 | 266.04 | 406.69 | 298.21 | 49.70 | 11.31 | 711.88 | 2.60 | 122.24 |
FIGURE 3Principal component analysis based on chemical composition of the seed coat and cotyledon, considering the gene pool classification reported by PérezVega et al. (2009). Accessions with Middle American origin are represented by yellow symbols and accessions with Andean classification are represented by gray symbols. The dashed lines represent the 95% confidence ellipses.