Literature DB >> 30482134

Communication with Families Regarding Organ and Tissue Donation after Death in Intensive Care (COMFORT): a multicentre before-and-after study.

Julie E Potter1, Lin Perry2, Rosalind M Elliott3, Anders Aneman4, Jorge L Brieva5, Elena Cavazzoni3, Andrew Th Cheng6, Michael J O'Leary3, Ian M Seppelt7, Robert G Herkes3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To implement a best-practice intervention offering deceased organ donation, testing whether it increased family consent rates.
DESIGN: A multicentre before-and-after study of a prospective cohort compared with pre-intervention controls.
SETTING: Nine Australian intensive care units. PARTICIPANTS: Families and health care professionals caring for donor-eligible patients without registered donation preferences or aged ≤ 16 years. INTERVENTION: A multicomponent intervention including offers of deceased organ donation from specially trained designated requesters using a structured conversation separate to end-of-life discussions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of families consenting to organ donation.
RESULTS: Consent was obtained in 87/164 cases (53%) during the intervention period compared with 14/25 cases (56%) pre-intervention (P = 0.83). The odds ratio (OR) of obtaining consent during the intervention period relative to preintervention was 1.13 (95% CI, 0.48-2.63; P = 0.78). During the intervention period, designated requesters obtained consent in 55/98 cases (56%), compared with 32/66 cases (48%) in which the medical team managing patient care raised donation (P = 0.34). Factors independently associated with increased consent were: family-raised organ donation (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.79-10.52; P = 0.001), presence of an independent designated requester (OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.35- 10.98; P = 0.012), and multiple donation conversations per case (OR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.93-5.81; P < 0.001). Consent decreased when patients were of non-Christian religion (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.91; P = 0.038) and end-of-life and donation meetings were separate (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.89; P = 0.026).
CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multicomponent intervention did not increase consent rates for organ donation, although some components of the intervention exerted significant effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000815763. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01922310.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30482134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Resusc        ISSN: 1441-2772            Impact factor:   2.159


  4 in total

1.  Will the unusual become usual? A new legal change that aims to increase discussions around organ and tissue donation in England.

Authors:  Heena Khiroya; Adnan Sharif; June Jones; Derek Willis
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2021-03

Review 2.  A narrative review of family members' experience of organ donation request after brain death in the critical care setting.

Authors:  Nancy Kentish-Barnes; L A Siminoff; W Walker; M Urbanski; J Charpentier; M Thuong; A Sarti; S D Shemie; E Azoulay
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  [Support of relatives in case of irreversible loss of brain function : Theory does not always correspond to practice].

Authors:  T Deffner; G Michels
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  A Comparison of the Content and Quality of Organ Donation Discussions with African American Families Who Authorize and Refuse Donation.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Gerard P Alolod; Heather M Gardiner; Richard D Hasz; Patricia A Mulvania; Maureen Wilson-Genderson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-06-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.