| Literature DB >> 30481531 |
Patrick S Hosford1, Alexander V Gourine2.
Abstract
The mechanisms of neurovascular coupling contribute to ensuring brain energy supply is sufficient to meet demand. Despite significant research interest, the mechanisms underlying increases in regional blood flow that follow heightened neuronal activity are not completely understood. This article presents a systematic review and analysis of published data reporting the effects of pharmacological or genetic blockade of all hypothesised signalling pathways of neurovascular coupling. Our primary outcome measure was the percent reduction of the neurovascular response assessed using in vivo animal models. Selection criteria were met by 50 primary sources reporting the effects of 79 treatments. Experimental conditions were grouped into categories targeting mechanisms mediated by nitric oxide (NO), prostanoids, purines, potassium, amongst others. Blockade of neuronal NO synthase was found to have the largest effect of inhibiting any individual target, reducing the neurovascular response by 64% (average of 11 studies). Inhibition of multiple targets in combination with nNOS blockade had no further effect. This analysis points to the existence of an unknown signalling mechanism accounting for approximately one third of the neurovascular response.Entities:
Keywords: Brain blood flow; Functional MRI; Functional hyperaemia; Neurovascular coupling; Systematic review
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30481531 PMCID: PMC6331662 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.11.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev ISSN: 0149-7634 Impact factor: 9.052
Fig. 1Hypothesized signalling mechanisms of the neurovascular coupling. Schematic illustration of all hypothesized pathways mediating the neurovascular response suggested by the results of studies summarized in Figures 2 and 3. All pathways are depicted assuming equal weighting. 20-HETE, 20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid; A2A, adenosine receptor 2A; AA, arachidonic acid; ACh, acetylcholine; ADO, adenosine; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; AMPAR, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; cGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate; COX, cyclooxygenase; CYP, cytochrome P450; DAGL, diacylglycerol lipase; EET, epoxyeicosatrienoic acid; ENT, ectonucleotidase; EP4, prostaglandin E2 receptor 4; EPOX, cytochrome P450 epoxygenase; GABAA, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) A receptor; GABAB, γ-aminobutyric acid B receptor; Kxx, potassium channels; mAchR, muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor; mGluR5, metabotropic glutamate receptor 5; NMDAR, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; NO, nitric oxide; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; P2X1, P2X purinoceptor 1; P2Y1, P2Y purinoceptor 1; PG, prostaglandin; PLA2, phospholipase A2; PLD2, phospholipase D2.
Fig. 2The effects of blocking hypothesized signalling mechanisms of neurovascular coupling Summary plot illustrating the percentage means (with 95% confidence intervals) of neurovascular coupling (NVC) responses that remain in conditions of pharmacological or genetic blockade of hypothesized signalling pathways in vivo. Individual data points illustrate the magnitude of the effects of the 79 experimental treatments reported in the publications referenced. *Multiple category includes the results of experimental studies that combined neuronal NOS (nNOS) inhibition with blockade of at least one other target. References: nNOS; (Bonvento et al., 2000; Burke and Buhrle, 2006; Cholet et al., 1997; Iadecola et al., 1993; Kitaura et al., 2007; Lindauer et al., 1999; Offenhauser et al., 2005; Stefanovic et al., 2007; Yang et al., 1999; Yang and Iadecola, 1997; Yang et al., 2003), Multiple; (Dirnagl et al., 1994; Golanov and Reis, 1994; Leithner et al., 2010; Peng et al., 2004; Petzold et al., 2008; Tarantini et al., 2015), ATP; (Mishra et al., 2016; Toth et al., 2015; Wells et al., 2015), NOS; (Adachi et al., 1992; Akgoren et al., 1997; Dirnagl et al., 1993; Golanov and Reis, 1994; Iadecola et al., 1993; Ido et al., 2004; Irikura et al., 1994; Kitaura et al., 2007; Ngai et al., 1995; Peng et al., 2004; Raszkiewicz et al., 1992; Toth et al., 2015; Yang and Iadecola, 1997; Zhang et al., 1995), Epoxygenase; (Lecrux et al., 2011; Peng et al., 2002, 2004), Ach; (Arneric et al., 1987; Biesold et al., 1989; Kocharyan et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 1995), Adenosine; (Dirnagl et al., 1994; Ko et al., 1990; Meno et al., 2005), COX-2; (Bakalova et al., 2002; Lecrux et al., 2011; Niwa et al., 2000), AMPA/NMDA; (Calcinaghi et al., 2011; Lecrux et al., 2011; Petzold et al., 2008; Yang et al., 1999), COX; (Bakalova et al., 2002; Bruhn et al., 2001; Golanov and Reis, 1994; St Lawrence et al., 2003), K+ Channels; (Hosford et al., 2018; Longden et al., 2017, 2011), mGluR; (Calcinaghi et al., 2011; Lecrux et al., 2011; Petzold et al., 2008; Sloan et al., 2010; Zonta et al., 2003), GABA; (Kocharyan et al., 2008; Lecrux et al., 2011), COX-1; (Niwa et al., 2001; Petzold et al., 2008).
Fig. 3The effects of blocking hypothesized signalling mechanisms of neurovascular coupling Summary plot illustrating the percentage means (with 95% confidence intervals) of neurovascular coupling (NVC) responses that remain in conditions of pharmacological or genetic blockade of hypothesized signalling pathways in vitro. Individual data points illustrate the magnitude of the effects of the 36 experimental treatments reported in the publications referenced: K+ Channels; (Filosa et al., 2006; Longden et al., 2014, 2017; Longden et al., 2011; Zaritsky et al., 2000), COX; (Filosa et al., 2006; Gordon et al., 2008; Mishra et al., 2016), NOS; (Mapelli et al., 2017; Mishra et al., 2016; Zonta et al., 2003), ATP; (Mishra et al., 2016), AMPA/NMDA; (Hall et al., 2014; Mapelli et al., 2017; Mishra et al., 2016; Zonta et al., 2003), Epoxygenase; (Hall et al., 2014; Mishra et al., 2016).