| Literature DB >> 30480155 |
Maria Luisa Tabing Mason1,2, Baby Lyn Cortez Tabing3, Akihiro Yamamoto4, Yuichi Saeki4.
Abstract
One of the strategies that is commonly used in the Philippines to improve the production of soybean is by inoculation. However, this technique often fails mainly due to the lack of information about the indigenous soybean rhizobia in the Philippines soil. In this study, the diversity of indigenous bradyrhizobia collected from the non-flooded and flooded soil conditions at 11 locations in the country was investigated using a local soybean cultivar as the host plant. The genetic variation among the 424 isolates was detected through Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) treatment and sequence analysis for 16S rRNA gene, 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region and rpoB housekeeping gene. All the isolates were classified under the Bradyrhizobium species namely B. elkanii, B. diazoefficiens, B. japonicum, B. yuanmingense and a considerable proportion of the isolates were clustered under Bradyrhizobium sp. The isolates which were classified under Bradyrhizobium sp. were thought to be endemic to Philippines soil as evidenced by their nucleotide divergence against the known rhizobia and the historical absence of rhizobia inoculation in the collection sites. The major influence on the distribution and diversity of soybean bradyrhizobia is attributed to the difference in the flooding period, followed by soil properties such as pH, soil type, and nutrient content. As determined, it is proposed that the major micro-symbiont of soybean in the Philippines are B. elkanii for non-flooded soils, then B. diazoefficiens and B. japonicum for flooded soils.Entities:
Keywords: Agriculture; Genetics; Microbiology
Year: 2018 PMID: 30480155 PMCID: PMC6240709 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Geographic distribution of the soybean-nodulating bradyrhizobia in the Philippines from the result of Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) and sequence analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA gene ITS region.
Information on the agro-environmental gradients of the Philippines soil used in this study.
| Location | Coordinate | pH | EC (dS/m) | C (%) | N (%) | C/N | Bray P (mg/kg) | K (mg/kg) | Sand (%) | Silt (%) | Clay (%) | Ave. Temp. (°C) | Flooding Period (month) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilagan, Isabela | 17.30°N,122.01°E | 5.90 | 0.08 | 1.34 | 0.13 | 10.3 | 1.86 | 51.80 | 28.0 | 34.5 | 37.5 | 26.9 | 5 |
| Gamu, Isabela | 17.08°N,121.79°E | 5.52 | 0.15 | 1.85 | 0.17 | 10.9 | 2.30 | 58.60 | 28.2 | 33.8 | 38.0 | 27.0 | 10 |
| Baguio, Benguet | 16.40°N,120.60°E | 5.22 | 0.20 | 3.10 | 0.24 | 12.9 | 22.22 | 51.00 | 19.0 | 41.4 | 39.6 | 19.3 | 10 |
| Nueva Ecija1 | 15.74°N,120.93°E | 6.21 | 0.05 | 1.37 | 0.13 | 10.5 | 6.74 | 73.90 | 28.7 | 34.6 | 36.7 | 26.9 | 5 |
| Nueva Ecija2 | 15.74°N,120.93°E | 5.81 | 0.12 | 2.36 | 0.22 | 10.7 | 21.63 | 49.40 | 27.4 | 34.7 | 37.9 | 26.9 | 10 |
| Irosin, Sorsogon | 12.72°N,124.04°E | 5.26 | 0.15 | 1.92 | 0.22 | 8.7 | 2.57 | 55.80 | 28.9 | 33.6 | 37.5 | 27.1 | 10 |
| Abuyog, Leyte | 10.67°N,125.04°E | 5.80 | 0.12 | 1.50 | 0.15 | 10.0 | 6.39 | 174.20 | 29.2 | 32.8 | 38.0 | 27.0 | 10 |
| La Carlota, Negros Occidental | 10.24°N,122.59°E | 5.62 | 0.15 | 0.63 | 0.07 | 9.0 | 20.44 | 74.10 | 28.0 | 34.2 | 37.8 | 27.7 | 5 |
| Ubay, Bohol | 9.99°N,124.45°E | 5.82 | 0.11 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 10.5 | 2.80 | 47.80 | 29.7 | 33.5 | 36.8 | 27.2 | 5 |
| Sultan Kudarat, Maguindanao | 6.51°N,124.42°E | 6.64 | 0.14 | 2.48 | 0.19 | 13.1 | 4.53 | 59.60 | 24.0 | 34.1 | 41.9 | 27.3 | 10 |
| Tupi, South Cotabato | 6.34°N,124.97°E | 5.52 | 0.15 | 1.36 | 0.14 | 9.7 | 31.18 | 47.20 | 19.5 | 42.5 | 38.0 | 25.4 | 10 |
Summary of the genetic variations detected from the 31 representative indigenous soybean-nodulating bradyrhizobia in the Philippines through the Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) treatment and sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene, 16S-23S rRNA ITS region, and rpoB housekeeping gene.
| Rep. isolate | Isolate (no.) | Cluster (RFLP) | Cluster (sequence analysis) | ITS- | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16S rRNA | ITS region | 16S rRNA | ITS region | |||||
| IS-2 | 40 | Be | Be76 | Be46 | Be31 | Be46 | Be31-Be46 | |
| GI-4 | 30 | Bj | Bj | Bj | Br | Br | Br-Br | |
| GI-8 | 6 | Be | Be76 | Be46 | nd | Be31 | Be46 | Be31-Be46 |
| BA-24 | 31 | Bj | Bj6 | Bj6 | Bj6’ | Bj6 | Bj6’-Bj6 | |
| BA-41 | 1 | Bj | Bj124 | Bj124 | Bj124’ | Bj124’ | Bj124’-Bj124’ | |
| BA-42 | 1 | Be | Be76 | Be76 | Be31 | Be46 | Be31-Be46 | |
| NE1-6 | 49 | Be | Be76 | Be46 | Be76’ | Be46 | Be76’-Be46 | |
| NE1-34 | 1 | Bj | Bj | Bj | BrNE | BrNE | BrNE-BrNE | |
| NE1-65 | 1 | Bj | Bj | Bj | Bd110 | Br | Bd110-Br | |
| NE2-1 | 3 | Be | Be76 | Be46 | Be76 | Be46 | Be76-Be46 | |
| NE2-3 | 5 | Bj | Br | Br | nd | Br | Br | Br-Br |
| NE2-37 | 26 | Br | Br | Br | Br | Br | Br-Br | |
| NE2-66 | 1 | Bj | Bj | Bj | nd | Br | Bj124’ | Br-Bj124’ |
| SO-1 | 44 | Bj | Bd110 | Bd110 | Bd110 | Bd110 | Bd110-Bd110 | |
| LT-3 | 42 | Bj | Bd110 | Bd110 | Bd110 | Bd110 | Bd110-Bd110 | |
| LT-36 | 1 | Be | Be76 | Be46 | nd | Be76’ | Be46 | Be76’-Be46 |
| NR-1 | 4 | Bj | Bj6 | Bj6 | nd | Bj6 | Bj6 | Bj6-Bj6 |
| NR-2 | 22 | Be | Be76 | Be46 | nd | Be76 | Be46 | Be76-Be46 |
| NR-40 | 3 | Bj | Bj124 | Br | Bj124’ | Bj | Bj124’-Bj | |
| NR-48 | 1 | Bj | Bd110 | Br | Bd110 | Bd110’ | Bd110-Bd110’ | |
| NR-60 | 1 | Br | Be76 | Br | nd | Be76 | Br | Be76-Br |
| BO-4 | 24 | Be | Be76 | Be46 | Be31 | Be46 | Be31-Be46 | |
| BO-15 | 4 | Bj | Bd110 | Bd110 | nd | Bd110 | Bd110 | Bd110-Bd110 |
| BO-52 | 1 | Bj | Bj | Br | nd | Br | Br | Br-Br |
| SK-1 | 4 | Be | Be46 | Be76 | Be46’ | Be130 | Be46’-Be130 | |
| SK-2 | 6 | Be | Be94 | Be94 | Be94’ | Be94 | Be94’-Be94 | |
| SK-5 | 29 | Bj | Bd110 | Bd110 | nd | Bd110 | Bd110 | Bd110-Bd110 |
| SK-12 | 4 | Br | Br | Br | BySK | BySK | BySK-BySK | |
| SC-3 | 31 | Bj | Bj6 | Bj6 | Bj6 | Bj6 | Bj6-Bj6 | |
| SC-49 | 3 | Be | Be76 | Be46 | nd | Be76 | Be46 | Be76-Be46 |
Note: The prime (’) symbol indicates a variation in the sequence identity of at least 1.00% between the isolates and the Bradyrhizobium USDA reference strains. Be – B. elkanii, Bd – B. diazoefficiens, Bj – B. japonicum, By – B. yuanmingense, Br – Bradyrhizobium sp., nd – not determined due to the similarity with the other isolates that possess an identical ITS-rpoB type.
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree based on the sequence analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA gene ITS region. The tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method with the Kimura 2-parameter distance correlation model and 1000 bootstrap replications in MEGA v.7 software. The accession numbers are indicated only for sequences obtained from the BLAST database. The isolates in this study are indicated with letters and number combinations, for example: IS-2 – isolate no. 2 collected from Ilagan, Isabela.
Fig. 3Phylogenetic tree based on the sequence analysis of the rpoB housekeeping gene. The tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method with the Kimura 2-parameter distance correlation model and 1000 bootstrap replications in MEGA v.7 software. The accession numbers are indicated only for sequences obtained from BLAST database. The isolates in this study are indicated with letters and number combinations, for example: IS-2 – isolate no. 2 collected from Ilagan, Isabela.
Population distribution and diversity indices of the indigenous bradyrhizobia in the Philippines. The Shannon's diversity (H′) and equitability (Eh) indices were computed with the formulae (H′ = −∑Pi ln Pi; Eh = H′/ln S).
| Cluster/location | IS | GI | BA | NE1 | NE2 | SO | LT | NR | BO | SK | SC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Be31 | 40 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 0 |
| Be46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Be76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Be94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Bj6 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 31 |
| Bj124 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bd110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 44 | 42 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 0 |
| By | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| 0 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Independent bradyrhizobia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Note: The Pi is the dominance of the isolate, expressed as (ni/N), where N and ni are the total number of isolates tested and the number of isolates belonging to a particular cluster, respectively. S is the total number of clusters, indicating the taxonomic group, at each field site.
Fig. 4Principal Component Analysis (PCA) plot depicting the relationship between the dominance of Bradyrhizobium species in the respective locations and the agro-environmental factors considered in this study. • Blackened circle indicates the agro-environmental factors. ♦ Blackened diamond indicates the location of the soil sampling collection. FP-period of flooding. Dotted straight line indicates the separation between the flooded and non-flooded soil condition.