| Literature DB >> 30480061 |
Diana Cabrera1, Frances M Wolber2, Keren Dittmer3, Chris Rogers3, Anne Ridler3, Danielle Aberdein3, Tim Parkinson3, Paul Chambers3, Karl Fraser4,5,6, Nicole C Roy4,5,6, Marlena Kruger1,4.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to validate the combination of ovariectomy and glucocorticoid treatment in sheep as a large animal model for osteoporosis by measuring the concentration of specific biomarkers in the blood of the sheep and measuring bone loss over five months. Aged Merino ewes were randomly allocated into four groups: control, ovariectomy (OVX), and two OVX groups receiving glucocorticoids-one group once-monthly for five months (OVXG), and the other for two months followed by no treatment for three months (OVXG2). Parameters measured were biochemical markers of bone turnover, areal bone mineral density, volumetric bone mineral density, and total and trabecular bone parameters. Ovariectomy increased the concentrations of bone resorption marker C-terminal telopeptides of type 1 collagen (CTx-1) and bone turnover marker serum osteocalcin (OC) concentrations in the OVX group compared to control sheep. The combination of ovariectomy and glucocorticoid treatment increased the concentrations of CTx-1 and decreased serum OC concentrations in the OVXG group compared to OVXG2. Femur and lumbar spine bone density were lower in experimentally treated groups when compared with the control group. Total and trabecular vBMD in the proximal tibia were significantly lower in the treatment groups when compared with the control group. A significant negative correlation between femoral bone density and CTx-1 was found. The results of this study suggest that the combination of OVX and glucocorticoids induces bone loss in a short period of time in sheep.Entities:
Keywords: Bone mineral density; Bone turnover markers; Glucocorticoids; Osteoporosis; Ovariectomy; Sheep
Year: 2018 PMID: 30480061 PMCID: PMC6249392 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2018.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Rep ISSN: 2352-1872
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the experimental study. Merino ewes were randomly divided into groups, 10 underwent no treatment (control group), 12 ewes underwent ovariectomy (OVX), and the remaining 6 ewes underwent OVX and received an injectable suspension of 400 mg methylprednisolone (OVXG group). Half of the ewes in the OVXG group received the methylprednisolone treatment for five months, while the other half received this treatment for only two months (OVXG2 group). Blood samples were collected monthly. BMD measurements were done at baseline (month zero) by pQCT, and at post-cull (month two or month five) by pQCT and DXA. Half of the sheep in the control group and OVX group were euthanised after two months, and the remaining sheep for each group were euthanised after five months. All the sheep in the OVXG group and OVXG2 were euthanised after five months.
Fig. 2The concentrations of OC and CTx-1 in the serum of the OVX sheep. Percentage change in the bone turnover marker serum OC (A) and percentage change in the bone resorption marker CTx-1 (B) compared with the pretreatment baseline from Merino ewes that were either ovariectomised (OVX), ovariectomised and given five doses of glucocorticoid at monthly intervals (OVXG), ovariectomised and given two doses glucocorticoid at monthly intervals (OVXG2), or received no treatments (Control). OC and CTx-1 were measured at two months and five months after initiation of the treatments. The results are presented as serum OC and CTx-1 mean percent change from baseline. *p-value <0.05. Error bars denote standard error of mean.
Changes of OC and CTx-1 over five months in the OVX sheep.
| Time (Month) | OC (ng/mL) | CTx-1 (ng/mL) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | OVX | OVXG | Control | OVX | OVXG | |||||
| 0 | 12.19 (4.97) | 15.07 (4.86) | 15.86 (6.66) | 0.107 | 0.96 (0.78) | 0.71 (0.36) | 0.74 (0.18) | 0.87 | ||
| 2 | 13.17 (4.17) | 19.33 (6.72) | 10.78 (7.48) | 0.013 | 0.61 (1.13) | 0.93 (0.56) | 0.87 (0.36) | 0.005 | ||
| 5 | 16.25 (7.24) | 18.38 (8.87) | 12.71 | 16.95 | 0.77 | 0.28 (0.04) | 0.95 (0.58) | 0.66 | 0.4 | 0.01 |
Data are presented as serum OC and CTx-1 mean (SD). The resulting p-values obtained by Kruskal–Wallis are given. p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Half of the ewes in the OVXG group received the methylprednisolone treatment for five months (OVXG group).
Half of the ewes in the OVXG group received the methylprednisolone treatment for only two months (OVXG2 group).
Fig. 3Bone parameters of lumbar spine and femur at month two and month five measured by DXA. (A) lumbar spine aBMD, (B) lumbar spine BMC, (C) femoral aBMD and (D) femoral BMC are shown for half of the ewes euthanised at month two in the control group and OVX group, and for the remaining ewes at month five for each group. Data is presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 4Bone variables at the proximal metaphysis of the tibia at month two and month five measured by pQCT. Total and trabecular tibial vBMD, area and BMC (A), (C) and (E), respectively, at month two. Total and trabecular tibial vBMD, area and BMC (B), (D) and (F), respectively, at month five are shown for half of the ewes euthanised at month two in the control group and OVX group; and the remaining ewes at month five for each group. Data is presented as mean and 95% confidence intervals. *p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Correlation between biochemical markers and BMD of lumbar spine, femur and tibia in OVX sheep at month two and month five of the study.
| OC | CTx-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman's correlation | Spearman's correlation | |||
| Month 2 | ||||
| Lumbar spine aBMD | −0.636 | 0.048 | −0.345 | 0.298 |
| Femur aBMD | −0.261 | 0.466 | 0.346 | 0.297 |
| Tibia | ||||
| vBMD | −0.418 | 0.229 | −0.336 | 0.312 |
| Trabecular vBMD | −0.479 | 0.162 | −0.409 | 0.212 |
| Month 5 | ||||
| Lumbar spine aBMD | 0.262 | 0.309 | −0.212 | 0.414 |
| Femur aBMD | 0.140 | 0.593 | −0.505 | 0.039 |
| Tibia | ||||
| vBMD | 0.130 | 0.619 | −0.284 | 0.269 |
| Trabecular vBMD | 0.184 | 0.480 | −0.404 | 0.107 |
p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.