| Literature DB >> 30479902 |
Lewis J Campbell1,2,3, Trenton W J Garner2, Giulia Tessa4, Benjamin C Scheele5, Amber G F Griffiths6, Lena Wilfert7,8, Xavier A Harrison2.
Abstract
Infectious diseases can alter the demography of their host populations, reducing their viability even in the absence of mass mortality. Amphibians are the most threatened group of vertebrates globally, and emerging infectious diseases play a large role in their continued population declines. Viruses belonging to the genus Ranavirus are responsible for one of the deadliest and most widespread of these diseases. To date, no work has used individual level data to investigate how ranaviruses affect population demographic structure. We used skeletochronology and morphology to evaluate the impact of ranaviruses on the age structure of populations of the European common frog (Rana temporaria) in the UK. We compared ecologically similar populations that differed most notably in their historical presence or absence of ranavirosis (the acute syndrome caused by ranavirus infection). Our results suggest that ranavirosis may truncate the age structure of R. temporaria populations. One potential explanation for such a shift might be increased adult mortality and subsequent shifts in the life history of younger age classes that increase reproductive output earlier in life. Additionally, we constructed population projection models which indicated that such increased adult mortality could heighten the vulnerability of frog populations to stochastic environmental challenges.Entities:
Keywords: Amphibians; Demography; Disease; Environmental stochasticity; Ranavirus
Year: 2018 PMID: 30479902 PMCID: PMC6241393 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5949
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Map of sampled R. temporaria populations.
Map of the locations of sampled populations within the southern UK. Fieldsites were drawn from the Frog Mortality Project database of populations known to have experienced mass mortality events due to ranavirosis and a complimentary database of populations known to have been ranavirosis-free since disease emergence in the 1990s. Populations = 1. Oxford; 2. Witham; 3. Palmer’s Green; 4. Folkington Corner; 5. Ealing; 6. Chessington; 7. Mitcham; 8. Tadworth; 9. Southampton; 10. Poole.
Summary of statistical model simplification procedure and results.
| Fixed effects structure | Removed fixed effect | Est | d | Chi2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male body size | |||||
| svl∼age * status | 6 | ||||
| svl∼age + status | Age * status | 5 | 0.059 | 0.81 | |
| svl∼age | Status | 4 | 0.21 | 0.65 | |
| svl∼1 | Age | 3.51 | 3 | 186.38 | <0.001 |
| Female body size | |||||
| svl∼age * status | 6 | ||||
| svl∼age + status | Age * status | 5 | 0.94 | 0.33 | |
| svl∼age | Status | 4 | 2.43 | 0.12 | |
| svl∼1 | Age | 3.21 | 3 | 47.16 | <0.001 |
| Male age at maturity | |||||
| agemat ∼ status | 4 | ||||
| agemat ∼ 1 | Status | −0.12 | 3 | 0.99 | 0.32 |
| Female age at maturity | |||||
| agemat ∼ status | 4 | ||||
| agemat ∼ 1 | Status | −0.12 | 3 | 0.29 | 0.59 |
Notes:
Model summaries of model simplification procedure to evaluate the effect of ranavirosis history on the body size and age at maturity of R. temporaria populations. All models contained only population of origin as a random effect applied to model intercepts.
The p-values presented here represent the significance of the parameter removed from the preceding model as calculated by a likelihood ratio test between models (ANOVA in R).
svl, snout to vent length; agemat, age at sexual maturity; df, degrees of freedom of the model; Est, effect size estimates of the final fixed effect removed from each model. All comparisons use disease-free populations as the reference level.
Figure 2Observed age structure across disease-free and ranavirosis-positive R. temporaria populations.
(A) Histogram of raw counts of numbers of individuals observed per age class per disease history status type. (B) Proportional stacked bar chart of the proportion of individuals found in populations of each disease history that was a given age, broken down by sex. Breeding populations with a positive history of ranavirosis are dominated by animals 5 years of age and younger. Disease-free populations are majorly comprised of animals 6 years of age and older. D-f = Disease free, R-p = Ranavirosis-positive.
Figure 3Differences in posterior probabilities of belonging to a given age class between population groups of varying disease history.
The mean difference in the posterior probabilities of belonging to a given age class by population ranavirosis history. Values >0 indicate that an age class is more likely to be observed in a ranavirosis-positive population and <0 a disease-free population. An age with 95% (2.5–97.5%) credible intervals that do not span zero suggests that influence of disease history on that age class is significantly supported by our model. This is the case for all classes other than age 6 which although found to be observed more often in disease-free populations has credible intervals spanning 0.
Figure 4Frequency plot of the number of model iterations in which each modelled population reached a given population size under stochastic environmental conditions.
Frequency polygon of iterations in which the projected population hit a given size in stochastic projection modelling. The same starting population vector based on summed observed disease-free populations was used in all models. D-f = Simulated disease-free population under a 10% annual chance of complete reproductive failure. R-p A = Simulated ranavirosis-positive population under a 10% annual chance of complete reproductive failure. R-p B = Simulated ranavirosis-positive population under a 10% annual chance of reproductive failure AND a 10% annual chance of a recurrent adult mass mortality event in exclusive years. R-p C = Simulated ranavirosis-positive population under identical conditions to R-p B = with addition of a 5% annual chance of complete recruitment failure and adult mass mortality in the same year.
Summary of the number of projection model iterations in which a population reached a given size under stochastic environmental conditions.
| Model | Extinct | <50 | 50–100 | 100–150 | 150–199 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disease-free | 12 | 525 | 177 | 734 | 1,319 | 2,233 |
| Ranavirosis-positive A | 429 | 4,062 | 443 | 48 | 15 | 3 |
| Ranavirosis-postiive B | 611 | 4,300 | 87 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Ranavirosis-positive C | 2,918 | 2,081 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Note:
The number of iterations per 5,000 that each stochastic projection model reached a given population size. Disease-Free = Simulated disease-free population under a 10% annual chance of complete reproductive failure. Ranavirosis-positive A = Simulated ranavirosis-positive population under a 10% annual chance of complete reproductive failure. Ranavirosis-postiive B = Simulated ranavirosis population under a 10% annual chance of reproductive failure and a 10% annual chance of a recurrent adult mass mortality event in exclusive years. Ranavirosis-positive C = Simulated ranavirosis-positive population under identical conditions to Ranavirosis-positive B with addition of a 5% annual chance of complete recruitment failure and adult mass mortality in the same year. K = Imposed population carrying capacity of 200.