| Literature DB >> 35898428 |
Anna Turner1, Geoffrey Heard2, Andrew Hall1, Skye Wassens1.
Abstract
Threatening processes, such as disease, can drive major changes in population demographics of the host. Chytridiomycosis, caused by the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), has led to the decline of at least 500 amphibian species across the globe and has been shown to truncate host age structure by lowering adult survival rates. This results in heavy reliance on annual recruitment and the inability to recover in the event of periodic recruitment failure. We used skeletochronology to determine the age structure, growth, and survival rates of populations of an endangered amphibian, Litoria raniformis, with endemic chytridiomycosis, across two climatically disparate regions in south-eastern Australia: semi-arid and temperate. Contrary to predictions, populations in the semi-arid region (in which chytrid prevalence is substantially lower due to high temperatures) displayed a more truncated age structure than populations in the temperate study regions. Maximum recorded age was only two years in the semi-arid region compared with up to four years in the temperate region. Wetland hydroperiod and average seasonal air temperature were correlated with age, and males had a slightly higher survival rate than females (0.31 for males and 0.27 for females). Despite the previously documented differences in chytrid prevalence between the two climatic regions, water availability and wetland hydroperiods appear the over-riding determinants of the age structure and survival rates of L. raniformis. Targeted management which ensures water availability and improves survival of 1-year-old frogs into their second and third breeding season would reduce the impact of stochastic events on L. raniformis, and this may be true for numerous frog species susceptible to chytridiomycosis.Entities:
Keywords: amphibian declines; conservation; demography; growth curves; life‐history
Year: 2022 PMID: 35898428 PMCID: PMC9309026 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 3.167
FIGURE 1Location and climate classification of the three study regions in South‐Eastern Australia, the semi‐arid (Lowbidgee) and temperate (Melbourne and Gippsland) regions.
FIGURE 2Histological sections of toe‐bones of Litoria raniformis. In each micrograph, thick black arrows indicate the line of metamorphosis (the limit of bone resorption) separating the inner endosteal bone and outer periosteal bone. White arrows indicate lines of arrested growth (LAG). (a) Young of year with SUL of 46.8 mm, caught 24th January 2019 at nap nap, Lowbidgee; (b) one LAG, SUL of 66.5 mm, caught 25th November 2018 at pollen dam, Lowbidgee; (c) two LAGS, male, SUL of 79 mm 4th Feb 2019 Crombe wetland, Gippsland; (d) two LAGs, male, SUL 64.1 mm, caught 4th Feb 2019 Crombe wetland, Gippsland. The scale bar in each micrograph is 100 μm data analysis.
Environmental variables considered potential determinants of age of Litoria raniformis at semi‐arid and temperate sites. Variable selection and expected relationships are based on mechanisms linking them to the prevalence and intensity of Bd identified in Turner, Wassens, and Heard (2021) along survival and growth of Bd in vitro, in vivo (in laboratory experiments) and in situ (in the field) identified in the literature and the possible impact on age of individual frogs (see ‘source’).
| Variable | Relationship/s | Mechanism (s) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lagged temperature variables | |||
|
Proportion of night‐time water/air temperature readings between 17 and 26°C during springs Proportion of night‐time water/air temperature readings between 17 and 26°C during summer Proportion of night‐time water/air temperature readings between 17 and 26°C during frog active season spring–autumn Average night‐time water/air temperature in spring Average night‐time water/air temperature in summer Average night‐time water/air temperature during frog active season | Negative linear | Within the specified season, as the proportion of night‐time temperature, in the optimum growth range for | Longcore et al. ( |
|
| |||
| Emergent vegetation cover (%) |
Positive linear |
As percentage of emergent vegetation increases, waterbodies potentially become more thermally stable within the optimum growth range for | Clemann et al. ( |
|
Negative linear |
However, emergent vegetation provides shelter from predators, calling platforms for breeding, substrate to attach frog spawn, food for tadpoles, diversity for insects, and other species as food source, which could increase survival rates | ||
| Salinity (as electrical conductivity, μS/cm) |
Positive linear |
A negative linear relationship was detected between salinity and chytrid prevalence in Turner, Wassens, and Heard ( | Heard et al. ( |
|
Quadratic effect |
A quadratic effect of salinity could also be possible due to extremely high salinity recordings in the Gippsland sites. Very high levels of salinity are not tolerated by amphibians, leading to a decrease in survivability | ||
| pH | Quadratic | Chytrid is sensitive to pH, displaying markedly higher growth and survival in a narrow band of slightly acidic to neutral conditions (pH of 6–7). We detected a quadratic effect of pH on chytrid prevalence. Infection prevalence and intensity may be higher within this band, decreasing survival and age of individual frogs | Piotrowski et al. ( |
| Hydroperiod | Positive linear |
As However, frogs also need a certain length hydroperiod to complete metamorphosis, an intermittent hydroperiod may mean frogs only breed in certain years, reducing the survival rate | Murphy et al. ( |
Hydroperiod was scored as the frequency of inundation, using the following ordinal scale: ‘Intermittent’ (1), ‘Ephemeral’ (2), ‘Semi‐permanent’ (3) and ‘Permanent’ (4).
FIGURE 3Proportion of Litoria raniformis in each age group sampled across the two climatic regions, either based only on ages determined by skeletochronology (a) or including all young‐of‐the‐year captured during surveys (b).
Ranking of the top five models describing environmental correlates of age of Litoria raniformis across the Lowbidgee, Gippsland, and Melbourne regions. All models include ‘site’ as a random effect. The number of parameters (K), the log likelihood (LogLik), Akaike's information criterion (AIC), distance from the most parsimonious model (ΔAIC), and model selection weight (W) are provided.
| Model | Variables |
| LogLik | AIC | ΔAIC |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Hydroperiod + Season air temperature average | 5 | −567.80 | 1145.69 | 0 | 0.9 |
| 18 | Hydroperiod + Season water temperature proportion 17–26°C | 5 | −569.74 | 1149.57 | 3.87 | 0.1 |
| 6 | Hydroperiod | 4 | −574.85 | 1157.75 | 12.05 | <0.01 |
| 3 | pH + pH 2 | 5 | −575.53 | 1161.15 | 15.45 | <0.01 |
| 13 | pH + Season air temperature average | 5 | −575.92 | 1161.93 | 16.23 | <0.01 |
Coefficient estimates for each environmental variable identified in the top three models determining age of Litoria raniformis. Estimates derive from the top model in which they appeared, with the exception of variables with a quadratic effect, in which estimates derive from the top model including the quadratic effect.
| Variable | Estimate | Std. error |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −0.89 | 0.14 | −6.59 | <.01 |
| Hydroperiod | 1.32 | 0.26 | 5.07 | <.01 |
| Season air temperature average | −1.44 | 0.32 | −4.48 | <.01 |
| Season water temperature proportion 17–26°C | −1.13 | 0.29 | −3.81 | <.01 |
FIGURE 4Post metamorphic growth curves for male (a) and female (b) Litoria raniformis across two climatic regions: Temperate and semi‐arid. Curves were derived for each sex by estimating the parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth model. Dots are the underlying size‐at‐age data for frogs from both climatic regions. Dots have been slightly jittered on the x‐axis to improve readability. The black line represents the predicted average growth rates for each region
Estimates of the parameters of the von Bertalanffy growth model for male and female Litoria raniformis in the semi‐arid and temperate regions. Parameters are: α—The asymptotic snout‐vent length (mm); β—The fraction of the asymptotic body size yet to be attained at birth; and λ—The growth constant. The 95% confidence interval (95% CI) is provided for each parameter.
| Sex | Climate |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Semi‐arid | 71.15 (66.05–76.62) | 0.52 (0.48–0.55) | 1.95 (1.15–5.29) |
| Temperate | 66.56 (64.59–68.78) | 0.49 (0.47–0.50) | 1.71 (1.36–2.16) | |
| Female | Semi‐arid | 86.7 (77.37–96.10) | 0.60 (0.56–0.64) | 1.74 (0.61–7.56) |
| Temperate | 85.68 (80.32–88.5) | 0.60 (0.57–0.61) | 0.91 (0.79–1.14) |
Mean survival rates of male and female Litoria raniformis from the null model (sex only) and for each hydroperiod classification (model with hydroperiod).
| Sex | Model | Mean survival rate | SD | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Null | 0.31 | 0.04 | 0.23–0.39 |
| Ephemeral | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.13–0.46 | |
| Semi‐permanent | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.20–0.40 | |
| Permanent | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.22–0.45 | |
| Female | Null | 0.27 | 0.04 | 0.18–0.36 |
| Ephemeral | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.10–0.41 | |
| Semi‐permanent | 0.25 | 0.05 | 0.16–0.36 | |
| Permanent | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.17–0.39 |
Parameter estimates for the effects of sex, hydroperiod, and seasonal average air temperature on adult survival rate of Litoria raniformis.
| Variable | Parameter estimate | SD | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.24 | 0.24 | −0.22–0.72 |
| Hydroperiod | 0.23 | 0.45 | −0.66–1.12 |
| Seasonal average air temperature | −0.09 | 0.64 | −1.35–1.16 |