| Literature DB >> 30479778 |
Tobias Kammerer1,2,3, Valentina Faihs1, Nikolai Hulde3, Andreas Bayer1, Max Hübner1,2, Florian Brettner1,2, Walter Karlen4, Julia Maria Kröpfl5, Markus Rehm1, Christina Spengler5, Simon Thomas Schäfer1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Normobaric (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) are associated with acute mountain sickness (AMS) and cognitive dysfunction. Only few variables, like heart-rate-variability, are correlated with AMS. However, prediction of AMS remains difficult. We therefore designed an expedition-study with healthy volunteers in NH/HH to investigate additional non-invasive hemodynamic variables associated with AMS.Entities:
Keywords: Acute mountain sickness; Cerebral oxygenation; Cognitive dysfunction; Hypobaric hypoxia; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Normobaric hypoxia
Year: 2018 PMID: 30479778 PMCID: PMC6245893 DOI: 10.1186/s40557-018-0276-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Occup Environ Med ISSN: 2052-4374
Fig. 1Experimental protocol for ascent and exercise in normobaric (hypoxic chamber) and hypobaric (Little Matterhorn summit) hypoxia
Fig. 2Peripheral and cerebral oxygen saturation and Lake Louise Score in normobaric (hypoxic chamber; n = 7) and hypobaric (Little Matterhorn summit; n = 11) hypoxia. a Changes in pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2: %). b Changes in regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2 % mean values of right and left hemisphere). Statistical analysis for A and B using one-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction, followed by multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. c Changes in Lake Louise Score (LLS: median and interquartile-range) for evaluation of Acute Mountain Sickness. Subjects completed a self-reported questionnaire on a tablet. Statistical analysis using Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests. d Comparison of regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2: %; mean values of right and left hemisphere) between the four subjects with lowest LLS and the four subjects with highest LLS after 24 h in hypobaric hypoxia. Statistical analysis using t-test with Bonferroni-Sidak correction, difference between groups after exercise * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. baseline in Munich at 520 m; ° p < 0.05, °° p < 0.01, °°° p < 0.001 vs. prior time point
Fig. 3Hemodynamic variables in normobaric (hypoxic chamber; n = 7) and hypobaric (Little Matterhorn summit; n = 11) hypoxia. Statistical analysis using one-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction, followed by multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. a Changes in heart rate (HR; min− 1). b Changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP; mmHg). c Changes in left ventricular ejection time (LVET; ms). d Changes in cardiac index (CI; l/min/m2). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 vs. baseline in Munich at 520 m; ° p < 0.05, °° p < 0.01, °°° p < 0.001 vs. prior time point; x p < 0.05 between corresponding time points in hypobaric and normobaric hypoxia (n = 7)
Parameters measured with noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring using Electrical Cardiometry
| Normobaric hypoxia (hypoxic chamber) | Hypobaric hypoxia (Little Matterhorn summit) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Munich 520 m | Ascent to simulated 3883 m | Exercise at simulated 3883 m | Munich 520 m | Ascent to 3883 m | Exercise at 3883 m | 3883 m after 24 h | 3883 m after 24 h and O2 | |
| Cardiac index (l/min/m2) | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.3 | 3.6 ± 0.50 | 2.7 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 3.6 ± 0.8** | 3.1 ± 0.7 | 2.8 ± 0.6 |
| Cardiac output (l/min) | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 5.6 ± 0.5 | 6.8 ± 0.8 | 5.0 ± 1.5 | 5.8 ± 1.6 | 6.9 ± 1.5 | 5.8 ± 1.4 | 5.3 ± 1.2 |
| Stroke volume (ml) | 84.3 ± 7.8 | 85.3 ± 7.6 | 76.5 ± 8.4 | 81.4 ± 14.0 | 74.1 ± 14.0 | 68.0 ± 10.7* | 67.6 ± 13.5* | 69.6 ± 13.6 |
| Left ventricular ejection time (ms) | 303 ± 27 | 304 ± 11 | 267 ± 13 | 313 ± 12 | 281 ± 12*** | 240 ± 16*** | 264 ± 20*** | 282 ± 19** |
| Index of contractility | 68.8 ± 20.1 | 68.2 ± 8.0 | 53.1 ± 13.8 | 64.8 ± 22.6 | 50.0 ± 17.5 | 45.2 ± 17.1** | 44.0 ± 15.2** | 45.9 ± 13.6* |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis with one-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser correction, followed by multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 vs. baseline in Munich at 520 m