Literature DB >> 21123763

Effect of repeated normobaric hypoxia exposures during sleep on acute mountain sickness, exercise performance, and sleep during exposure to terrestrial altitude.

Charles S Fulco1, Stephen R Muza, Beth A Beidleman, Robby Demes, Janet E Staab, Juli E Jones, Allen Cymerman.   

Abstract

There is an expectation that repeated daily exposures to normobaric hypoxia (NH) will induce ventilatory acclimatization and lessen acute mountain sickness (AMS) and the exercise performance decrement during subsequent hypobaric hypoxia (HH) exposure. However, this notion has not been tested objectively. Healthy, unacclimatized sea-level (SL) residents slept for 7.5 h each night for 7 consecutive nights in hypoxia rooms under NH [n = 14, 24 ± 5 (SD) yr] or "sham" (n = 9, 25 ± 6 yr) conditions. The ambient percent O(2) for the NH group was progressively reduced by 0.3% [150 m equivalent (equiv)] each night from 16.2% (2,200 m equiv) on night 1 to 14.4% (3,100 m equiv) on night 7, while that for the ventilatory- and exercise-matched sham group remained at 20.9%. Beginning at 25 h after sham or NH treatment, all subjects ascended and lived for 5 days at HH (4,300 m). End-tidal Pco(2), O(2) saturation (Sa(O(2))), AMS, and heart rate were measured repeatedly during daytime rest, sleep, or exercise (11.3-km treadmill time trial). From pre- to posttreatment at SL, resting end-tidal Pco(2) decreased (P < 0.01) for the NH (from 39 ± 3 to 35 ± 3 mmHg), but not for the sham (from 39 ± 2 to 38 ± 3 mmHg), group. Throughout HH, only sleep Sa(O(2)) was higher (80 ± 1 vs. 76 ± 1%, P < 0.05) and only AMS upon awakening was lower (0.34 ± 0.12 vs. 0.83 ± 0.14, P < 0.02) in the NH than the sham group; no other between-group rest, sleep, or exercise differences were observed at HH. These results indicate that the ventilatory acclimatization induced by NH sleep was primarily expressed during HH sleep. Under HH conditions, the higher sleep Sa(O(2)) may have contributed to a lessening of AMS upon awakening but had no impact on AMS or exercise performance for the remainder of each day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21123763     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00633.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  21 in total

1.  Hypoxic conditions and exercise-to-rest ratio are likely paramount.

Authors:  Grégoire P Millet; Raphael Faiss
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Physiological Employment Standards III: physiological challenges and consequences encountered during international military deployments.

Authors:  Bradley C Nindl; John W Castellani; Bradley J Warr; Marilyn A Sharp; Paul C Henning; Barry A Spiering; Dennis E Scofield
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Endurance test selection optimized via sample size predictions.

Authors:  Roy M Salgado; Aaron R Caldwell; Kirsten E Coffman; Samuel N Cheuvront; Robert W Kenefick
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-07-30

Review 4.  Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 1. Commonly-used classes of drugs.

Authors:  Víctor H Nieto Estrada; Daniel Molano Franco; Roger David Medina; Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-06-27

5.  Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 3. Miscellaneous and non-pharmacological interventions.

Authors:  Daniel Molano Franco; Víctor H Nieto Estrada; Alejandro G Gonzalez Garay; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-23

Review 6.  Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 2. Less commonly-used drugs.

Authors:  Alejandro Gonzalez Garay; Daniel Molano Franco; Víctor H Nieto Estrada; Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-12

7.  Comparison of "Live High-Train Low" in normobaric versus hypobaric hypoxia.

Authors:  Jonas J Saugy; Laurent Schmitt; Roberto Cejuela; Raphael Faiss; Anna Hauser; Jon P Wehrlin; Benjamin Rudaz; Audric Delessert; Neil Robinson; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cycling performance decrement is greater in hypobaric versus normobaric hypoxia.

Authors:  Beth A Beidleman; Charles S Fulco; Janet E Staab; Sean P Andrew; Stephen R Muza
Journal:  Extrem Physiol Med       Date:  2014-04-28

9.  Same Performance Changes after Live High-Train Low in Normobaric vs. Hypobaric Hypoxia.

Authors:  Jonas J Saugy; Laurent Schmitt; Anna Hauser; Guillaume Constantin; Roberto Cejuela; Raphael Faiss; Jon P Wehrlin; Jérémie Rosset; Neil Robinson; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Evidence for cerebral edema, cerebral perfusion, and intracranial pressure elevations in acute mountain sickness.

Authors:  Dana M DiPasquale; Stephen R Muza; Andrea M Gunn; Zhi Li; Quan Zhang; N Stuart Harris; Gary E Strangman
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.