Nadine Matti1, Minh-Nha R Nguyen1, Cassandra Mosel1, Luke E Grzeskowiak2. 1. SA Pharmacy, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia. 2. Adelaide Medical School, The Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Level 6, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medication errors are common in neonatal care and can lead to significant harm. We sought to explore utilization of various medication error prevention strategies across Australian and New Zealand neonatal units (NNUs) through a clinical practice survey. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed in October 2016 to relevant staff at each of the 29 level III NNUs identified as members of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN). The survey contained questions relating to a range of medication error prevention strategies identified from a previous systematic review on the topic. The evaluated interventions targeted different aspects of the medication-use process including prescribing, evaluation/checking of orders by clinical pharmacists, transmission, preparation and dispensing of orders, storage of medications, and medication administration. RESULTS: From the 20 respondents, the evidence-based strategies most commonly utilized were use of smart pumps (n = 18; 90%), and ward-based clinical pharmacists (n = 17; 85%). Interventions least commonly utilized included barcode scanning with medication administration (n = 0; 0%), electronic prescribing and clinical decision support (n = 1; 5%), and dedicated medication administration nurse (n = 2; 10%). The total number of evidence-based medication error prevention strategies utilized in each NNU ranged from 2 to 10 (median = 7), 10 of 16 strategies were utilized by less than 50% of NNUs. CONCLUSION: While evidence supports utilization of a number of medication error prevention strategies, these appear inconsistently utilized across current practice settings.
BACKGROUND: Medication errors are common in neonatal care and can lead to significant harm. We sought to explore utilization of various medication error prevention strategies across Australian and New Zealand neonatal units (NNUs) through a clinical practice survey. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed in October 2016 to relevant staff at each of the 29 level III NNUs identified as members of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN). The survey contained questions relating to a range of medication error prevention strategies identified from a previous systematic review on the topic. The evaluated interventions targeted different aspects of the medication-use process including prescribing, evaluation/checking of orders by clinical pharmacists, transmission, preparation and dispensing of orders, storage of medications, and medication administration. RESULTS: From the 20 respondents, the evidence-based strategies most commonly utilized were use of smart pumps (n = 18; 90%), and ward-based clinical pharmacists (n = 17; 85%). Interventions least commonly utilized included barcode scanning with medication administration (n = 0; 0%), electronic prescribing and clinical decision support (n = 1; 5%), and dedicated medication administration nurse (n = 2; 10%). The total number of evidence-based medication error prevention strategies utilized in each NNU ranged from 2 to 10 (median = 7), 10 of 16 strategies were utilized by less than 50% of NNUs. CONCLUSION: While evidence supports utilization of a number of medication error prevention strategies, these appear inconsistently utilized across current practice settings.
Authors: Rachel G Greenberg; P Brian Smith; Carl Bose; Reese H Clark; C Michael Cotten; Chris DeRienzo Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Johanna I Westbrook; Ling Li; Elin C Lehnbom; Melissa T Baysari; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Rosemary Burke; Chris Conn; Richard O Day Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Laura E Miller; Chris DeRienzo; P Brian Smith; Carl Bose; Reese H Clark; C Michael Cotten; Daniel K Benjamin; Chi D Hornik; Rachel G Greenberg Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2020-10-08 Impact factor: 2.521