| Literature DB >> 30479650 |
Zainab Taha1, Malin Garemo1, Joy Nanda2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the ongoing efforts to improve infant feeding practices, low rates of breastfeeding and early introduction of complementary feeding have been reported in many countries. Systematic documentation of breastfeeding practices in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is needed in order to directing successful strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate breastfeeding practices among mothers in Abu Dhabi, UAE, using the World Health Organization (WHO) infant and young child feeding indicators.Entities:
Keywords: Abu Dhabi; Complementary feeding; Exclusive breastfeeding; Infant nutrition; Toddler; United Arab Emirates
Year: 2018 PMID: 30479650 PMCID: PMC6240248 DOI: 10.1186/s13006-018-0192-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Breastfeed J ISSN: 1746-4358 Impact factor: 3.461
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the overall recruitment of study participants
Family demographic and health characteristics
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Mother’s age (years) | |
| 17–19 | 20 (1.1) |
| 20–24 | 247 (13.6) |
| 25–34 | 1152 (63.2) |
| 35–51 | 403 (22.1) |
| Mother’s nationality | |
| Emirati | 596 (32.7) |
| Non Emirati-Arab | 611 (33.5) |
| Non Emirati-Non Arab | 615 (33.8) |
| Marital status | |
| Married | 1787 (98.1) |
| Unmarried | 35 (1.9) |
| Mother’s educationa | |
| Below high school | 80 (4.4) |
| High school | 339 (18.8) |
| University | 1382 (76.7) |
| Father’s educationb | |
| Below high school | 39 (2.1) |
| High school | 205 (11.3) |
| University | 1570 (86.5) |
| Mother’s employment status | |
| Employed | 722 (39.6) |
| Not employed | 1100 (60.4) |
| Family financial wellbeing | |
| Excellent/Very good | 1211 (66.5) |
| Good | 487 (26.7) |
| Fair | 106 (5.8) |
| Poor/Very poor | 18 (1.0) |
a21 missing data, b8 missing data
Child characteristics (n = 1822)
| Child characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Child’s age at interview (months) | |
| < 1 | 20 (1.1) |
| 1–3 | 395 (21.7) |
| 4–6 | 403 (22.1) |
| 7–12 | 495 (27.2) |
| 13–18 | 296 (16.2) |
| 19–24 | 213 (11.7) |
| Gendera | |
| Female | 932 (51.5) |
| Male | 879 (48.5) |
| Delivery Typeb | |
| Vaginal | 1252 (68.9) |
| Cesarean Section | 566 (31.1) |
| Delivery hospital | |
| Baby Friendly accreditedc | 755 (41.4) |
| Non Baby Friendly accredited | 1067 (58.6) |
| Gestational Aged | |
| < 37 weeks | 128 (7.1) |
| ≥38 weeks | 1681 (92.9) |
| Birth Weight (grams) | |
| < 37 weeks (mean ± SD) | 2351 ± 727 |
| ≥38 weeks (mean ± SD) | 3127 ± 424 |
a11 missing data
b4 missing data
cBaby Friendly accreditation according to the WHO and UNICEF standard
d13 missing data
Fig. 2The survival analysis test curve reflecting the cumulative, exclusive breastfeeding experience among all children who had initiated breastfeeding in this study (n = 1741)
Fig. 3The overall feeding pattern of children < 6 months at the time of the interview (n = 818). AF Formula feeding, EBF Exclusive Breastfeeding, BF Breastfeeding, CF Complementary Feeding
Fig. 4The overall feeding pattern of children ≥6 months at the time of the interview (n = 1004). AF Formula feeding, EBF Exclusive Breastfeeding, BF Breast Feeding, CF Complementary Feeding, CF<6m/≥6m indicate age (months) of child when CF was introduced
Study findings compared to the WHO infant and young child feeding indicators
| Practices defined by WHOa | Study findings % ( | WHO ratingb(Range for this rating in %) |
|---|---|---|
| Initiation of breastfeeding (% of babies breastfed within 1 h of birth). | 59.8 (1089/1822) | Good (50–89) |
| Exclusive breastfeeding (% of babies 0 – < 6 months of age exclusively breastfed in the last 24 h). | 44.3 (362/818) | Fair (12–49) |
| Duration of breastfeeding (median duration in months of breastfeeding of children under 3 years of age).c | 12 (1741) | Poor (0-17) |
| Complementary feeding (% of breastfed babies 6 – < 10 or 7 – < 10 months of age who received complementary foods in the last 24 h). | 79.9 (311/389) | Good (80–94) |
aWorld Health Organization. Infant and young child feeding a tool for assessing national practices, policies and programmes. WHO. Geneva 2003
bThe rating options are poor/fair/good/very good for all variables but the percentage varies depending on practise
cThe children in this study were ≤ 2 years of age