Literature DB >> 30479637

Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of lesions in the head and neck performed without local anaesthesia - An analysis of pain perception.

Nicholas Drage1, Christopher Greenall2, Damian Jj Farnell3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology is commonly carried out in the head and neck. The aim was to examine the amount of pain experienced by patients undergoing this procedure carried out without the use of local anaesthetic.
METHODS: A questionnaire was given to 109 consecutive patients undergoing ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology containing a visual analogue scale. Patients were asked to mark with a vertical line on the 100 mm horizontal scale amount of pain they experienced during the biopsy. The pain was subsequently categorised as 'no pain', 'mild pain', 'moderate pain' or 'severe pain' based on previous pain studies.
RESULTS: Hundred patients completed the visual analogue scale section of the questionnaire satisfactorily. Twenty-one patients experienced no pain, 62 experienced mild pain and 17 experienced moderate pain. No patients experienced severe pain. Further analysis showed that females had significantly higher visual analogue scale scores (Mann-Whitney test: U = 925.5, z = 2.211, P = 0.027). Patients who were aware that they were going to have a biopsy had significantly lower visual analogue scale scores than those who were not aware (Mann-Whitney test: U = 859.5, z = 2.263, P = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology is generally a well-tolerated procedure with pain scores being higher in females. It is advised that patients are told by the referring clinician the need for biopsy as this reduces the amount of pain experienced.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; pain; ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 30479637      PMCID: PMC6243453          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X18780137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  25 in total

1.  Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Connie Chen; Andrew M Brugger
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.820

2.  Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: a double-blind placebo controlled study.

Authors:  Dan Leibovici; Amnon Zisman; Yoram I Siegel; Avishay Sella; Judy Kleinmann; Arie Lindner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  E J Bartley; R B Fillingim
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Age effects on pain thresholds, temporal summation and spatial summation of heat and pressure pain.

Authors:  Stefan Lautenbacher; Miriam Kunz; Peter Strate; Jesper Nielsen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Frequency and intensity of pain related to thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology.

Authors:  Sophie Leboulleux; Isabelle Borget; Stéphanie Labro; Sophie Bidault; Philippe Vielh; Dana Hartl; Sarah Dauchy; Cécile N Chougnet; Elizabeth Girard; Sandy Azoulay; Haitham Mirghani; Amandine Berdelou; Jean Lumbroso; Désirée Deandreis; Eric Baudin; Martin Schlumberger; Sophie Laurent
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 6.568

Review 6.  Gender differences in pain and its relief.

Authors:  Stefano Pieretti; Amalia Di Giannuario; Rita Di Giovannandrea; Francesca Marzoli; Giovanni Piccaro; Paola Minosi; Anna Maria Aloisi
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.663

7.  Use of a numerical rating scale as an answer modality in ankylosing spondylitis-specific questionnaires.

Authors:  Astrid Van Tubergen; Iris Debats; Liliane Ryser; John Londoño; Ruben Burgos-Vargas; Mario H Cardiel; Robert Landewé; Gerold Stucki; Désirée Van Der Heijde
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-06-15

Review 8.  Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP).

Authors:  Gillian A Hawker; Samra Mian; Tetyana Kendzerska; Melissa French
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 9.  Pain mechanisms: labeled lines versus convergence in central processing.

Authors:  A D Bud Craig
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 12.449

10.  The perception of pain in others: how gender, race, and age influence pain expectations.

Authors:  Laura D Wandner; Cindy D Scipio; Adam T Hirsh; Calia A Torres; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 5.383

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.