Literature DB >> 14622683

Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain.

Mark P Jensen1, Connie Chen, Andrew M Brugger.   

Abstract

The visual analog scale (VAS) is one of the most commonly used measures of pain intensity in pain research. However, there remain important unanswered questions concerning interpretation of specific VAS ratings and change scores. To address these questions, we performed a reanalysis of data from 2 randomized controlled trials of postoperative pain (N = 123 and N = 125) to determine the meaning of VAS pain intensity ratings and change scores. The findings suggested that 100-mm VAS ratings of 0 to 4 mm can be considered no pain; 5 to 44 mm, mild pain; 45 to 74 mm, moderate pain; and 75 to 100 mm, severe pain. As predicted, in assessment of the amount of change corresponding to differing levels of pain relief, percentage change in a patient's VAS score was less biased by pretreatment pain than was absolute change score. The findings also suggested that a 33% decrease in pain represents a reasonable standard for determining that a change in pain is meaningful from the patient's perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14622683     DOI: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  242 in total

1.  Determining clinically important differences in health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy or surgery.

Authors:  C Quinten; C Kenis; L Decoster; P R Debruyne; I De Groof; C Focan; F Cornelis; V Verschaeve; C Bachmann; D Bron; S Luce; G Debugne; H Van den Bulck; J C Goeminne; A Baitar; K Geboers; B Petit; C Langenaeken; R Van Rijswijk; P Specenier; G Jerusalem; J P Praet; K Vandenborre; M Lycke; J Flamaing; K Milisen; J P Lobelle; H Wildiers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Postoperative pain profile in 10-15-year-olds after bilateral extraction of maxillary premolars.

Authors:  H Berlin; T List; K Ridell; T Davidson; D Toft; G Klingberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-04-08

3.  Preliminary evidence of altered biomechanics in adolescents with juvenile fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Soumitri Sil; Staci Thomas; Christopher DiCesare; Daniel Strotman; Tracy V Ting; Gregory Myer; Susmita Kashikar-Zuck
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Association of electromyographic activation patterns with pain and functional disability in people with chronic neck pain.

Authors:  Sharon M H Tsang; Grace P Y Szeto; Y F Xie; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Prognostic value of age for chronic postoperative inguinal pain.

Authors:  H R Langeveld; P Klitsie; H Smedinga; H Eker; M Van't Riet; W Weidema; Y Vergouwe; H J Bonjer; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Trajectories of fatigue in family caregivers of patients undergoing radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Barbara A Swore Fletcher; Karen L Schumacher; Marylin Dodd; Steven M Paul; Bruce A Cooper; Kathryn Lee; Claudia West; Bradley E Aouizerat; Patrick S Swift; William Wara; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.228

7.  Predictive Factors for Pain After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Tumors.

Authors:  Seung Young Kim; Sung Woo Jung; Jung Wan Choe; Jong Jin Hyun; Young Kul Jung; Ja Seol Koo; Hyung Joon Yim; Sang Woo Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria Alba
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring tolerability and blood pressure status in adolescents: the SHIP AHOY study.

Authors:  Gilad Hamdani; Joseph T Flynn; Stephen Daniels; Bonita Falkner; Coral Hanevold; Julie Ingelfinger; Marc B Lande; Lisa J Martin; Kevin E Meyers; Mark Mitsnefes; Bernard Rosner; Joshua Samuels; Elaine M Urbina
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.444

10.  Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with an ultrasound scalpel or laser: is there a difference?

Authors:  Perttu Reijo Juhani Halme; J Antila; H Antila; H Aho; O Polo; H Salminiitty; E Toskala
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.