| Literature DB >> 30479064 |
Daniel A Morgenstern1, Rochelle Bagatell2, Susan L Cohn3, Michael D Hogarty2, John M Maris2, Lucas Moreno4, Julie R Park5, Andrew D Pearson6, Gudrun Schleiermacher7, Dominique Valteau-Couanet8, Wendy B London9, Meredith S Irwin1.
Abstract
Given the biological and clinical heterogeneity of neuroblastoma, risk stratification is vital to determining appropriate treatment. Historically, most patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL) have been treated uniformly without further stratification. Attempts have been made to identify factors that can be used to risk stratify these patients and to characterize an "ultra-high-risk" (UHR) subpopulation with particularly poor outcome. However, among published data, there is a lack of consensus in the definition of the UHR population and heterogeneity in the endpoints and statistical methods used. This review summarizes our current understanding of stratification of HR-NBL and discusses the complex issues in defining UHR neuroblastoma.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; high-risk; neuroblastoma; risk stratification
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30479064 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer ISSN: 1545-5009 Impact factor: 3.167