Literature DB >> 30478662

How accurate is the accuracy?

Sergey V Nesterov1, Juhani Knuuti2.   

Abstract

Year:  2018        PMID： 30478662     DOI： 10.1007/s12350-018-01537-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN： 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of PET-derived myocardial blood flow parameters: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Geon Cho; Soo Jin Lee; Myung Hwan Na; Yun Young Choi; Henry Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.952
  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  82Rb-PET MPQ: Do normal values exist?

Authors:  Sergey V Nesterov; Juhani M Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Myocardial perfusion quantification with Rb-82 PET: good interobserver agreement of Carimas software on global, regional, and segmental levels.

Authors:  Sergey V Nesterov; Emmanuel Deshayes; Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco; Robert A deKemp; Roberto Sciagrà; Simona Malaspina; Leonardo Settimo; Chunlei Han; Darja V Ryzhkova; Irina S Kostina; Kilem L Gwet; John O Prior; Juhani M Knuuti
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.258

3.  One-tissue compartment model for myocardial perfusion quantification with N-13 ammonia PET provides matching results: A cross-comparison between Carimas, FlowQuant, and PMOD.

Authors:  Sergey V Nesterov; Roberto Sciagrà; Luis Eduardo Juarez Orozco; John O Prior; Leonardo Settimo; Chunlei Han; Emmanuel Deshayes; Robert A deKemp; Darja V Ryzhkova; Kilem L Gwet; Juhani M Knuuti
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.872
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.