Literature DB >> 30478035

Ipsilateral-Dominant Control of Limb Movements in Rodent Posterior Parietal Cortex.

Shogo Soma1,2,3, Junichi Yoshida4,3, Shigeki Kato5, Yukari Takahashi6, Satoshi Nonomura4,2, Yae K Sugimura6, Alain Ríos7, Masanori Kawabata7, Kazuto Kobayashi5, Fusao Kato6, Yutaka Sakai4,7,2, Yoshikazu Isomura4,7,2.   

Abstract

It is well known that the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and frontal motor cortices in primates preferentially control voluntary movements of contralateral limbs. The PPC of rats has been defined based on patterns of thalamic and cortical connectivity. The anatomical characteristics of this area suggest that it may be homologous to the PPC of primates. However, its functional roles in voluntary forelimb movements have not been well understood, particularly in the lateralization of motor limb representation; that is, the limb-specific activity representations for right and left forelimb movements. We examined functional spike activity of the PPC and two motor cortices, the primary motor cortex (M1) and the secondary motor cortex (M2), when head-fixed male rats performed right or left unilateral movements. Unlike primates, PPC neurons in rodents were found to preferentially represent ipsilateral forelimb movements, in contrast to the contralateral preference of M1 and M2 neurons. Consistent with these observations, optogenetic activation of PPC and motor cortices, respectively, evoked ipsilaterally and contralaterally biased forelimb movements. Finally, we examined the effects of optogenetic manipulation on task performance. PPC or M1 inhibition by optogenetic GABA release shifted the behavioral limb preference contralaterally or ipsilaterally, respectively. In addition, weak optogenetic PPC activation, which was insufficient to evoke motor responses by itself, shifted the preference ipsilaterally; although similar M1 activation showed no effects on task performance. These paradoxical observations suggest that the PPC plays evolutionarily different roles in forelimb control between primates and rodents.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In rodents, the primary and secondary motor cortices (M1 and M2, respectively) are involved in voluntary movements with contralateral preference. However, it remains unclear whether and how the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) participates in controlling multiple limb movements. We recorded functional activity from these areas using a behavioral task to monitor movements of the right and left forelimbs separately. PPC neurons preferentially represented ipsilateral forelimb movements and optogenetic PPC activation evoked ipsilaterally biased forelimb movements. Optogenetic PPC inhibition via GABA release shifted the behavioral limb preference contralaterally during task performance, whereas weak optogenetic PPC activation, which was insufficient to evoke motor responses by itself, shifted the preference ipsilaterally. Our findings suggest rodent PPC contributes to ipsilaterally biased motor response and/or planning.
Copyright © 2019 the authors 0270-6474/19/390485-18$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  association cortex; channelrhodopsin; limb specificity; optogenetic activation; optogenetic inhibition; transgenic rat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30478035      PMCID: PMC6335753          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1584-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  79 in total

1.  Integration of target and body-part information in the premotor cortex when planning action.

Authors:  E Hoshi; J Tanji
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The representations of reach endpoints in posterior parietal cortex depend on which hand does the reaching.

Authors:  Steve W C Chang; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Distinct cortical circuit mechanisms for complex forelimb movement and motor map topography.

Authors:  Thomas C Harrison; Oliver G S Ayling; Timothy H Murphy
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Microstimulation reveals specialized subregions for different complex movements in posterior parietal cortex of prosimian galagos.

Authors:  Iwona Stepniewska; Pei-Chun Fang; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Movement intention is better predicted than attention in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Rodrigo Quian Quiroga; Lawrence H Snyder; Aaron P Batista; He Cui; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Klusters, NeuroScope, NDManager: a free software suite for neurophysiological data processing and visualization.

Authors:  Lynn Hazan; Michaël Zugaro; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Limb-specific representation for reaching in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Steve W C Chang; Anthony R Dickinson; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Conditional selection of contra- and ipsilateral forelimb movements by the dorsal premotor cortex in monkeys.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Kurata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Relation of neurons in the nonprimary motor cortex to bilateral hand movement.

Authors:  J Tanji; K Okano; K C Sato
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jun 18-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The motor cortex of the rat: cytoarchitecture and microstimulation mapping.

Authors:  J P Donoghue; S P Wise
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1982-11-20       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cortical activation in generalized seizures.

Authors:  Li Ding; Sanjana Satish; Chengwen Zhou; Martin J Gallagher
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.864

2.  Distributed and Localized Dynamics Emerge in the Mouse Neocortex during Reach-to-Grasp Behavior.

Authors:  Eros Quarta; Alessandro Scaglione; Jessica Lucchesi; Leonardo Sacconi; Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro; Francesco Saverio Pavone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  Active role of the central amygdala in widespread mechanical sensitization in rats with facial inflammatory pain.

Authors:  Mariko Sugimoto; Yukari Takahashi; Yae K Sugimura; Ryota Tokunaga; Manami Yajima; Fusao Kato
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  Primary Role of the Amygdala in Spontaneous Inflammatory Pain- Associated Activation of Pain Networks - A Chemogenetic Manganese-Enhanced MRI Approach.

Authors:  Daigo Arimura; Kei Shinohara; Yukari Takahashi; Yae K Sugimura; Mariko Sugimoto; Tomokazu Tsurugizawa; Keishi Marumo; Fusao Kato
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.492

5.  Noradrenaline modulates neuronal and perceptual visual detectability via β-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  Keisuke Tsunoda; Akinori Y Sato; Ryo Mizuyama; Satoshi Shimegi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Neurostimulation and Reach-to-Grasp Function Recovery Following Acquired Brain Injury: Insight From Pre-clinical Rodent Models and Human Applications.

Authors:  Charles-Francois V Latchoumane; Deborah A Barany; Lohitash Karumbaiah; Tarkeshwar Singh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Action representation in the mouse parieto-frontal network.

Authors:  Tuce Tombaz; Benjamin A Dunn; Karoline Hovde; Ryan John Cubero; Bartul Mimica; Pranav Mamidanna; Yasser Roudi; Jonathan R Whitlock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.